Speedway

Top edits to an page All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.

Page Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Highways (Log · Page History)
User Tagishsimon (Edit Counter· Top Edits)
Total edits 26
Minor edits 0 (0%)
(Semi-)automated edits 0 (0%)
Reverted edits 0 (0%)
atbe1 22.3
Added (bytes)2 30,711
Deleted (bytes) -21
Minor edits · 0 (0%)
Major edits · 26 (100%)
(Semi-)automated edits · 0 (0%)
Manual edits · 26 (100%)
Reverted edits · 0 (0%)
Unreverted edits · 26 (100%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
Date Links Size Edit summary
Diff · History 696 Closure of RfC: clarification: ==The KML map link method, and tagging articles with KML missing==
Diff · History 649 Closure of RfC: clarification: *The logical inverse to a limit would generally be no limit, which you state in saying "There was no consensus to put a limit'. YMMV, of course.
Diff · History 508 Discussion of Proposal 9: I hazard the proposition that there are three classes of users w.r.t. maps linked from roads: those with no interest at all; those interested in seeing the whole road a la shapefile; and those interested is a specific p
Diff · History 1,181 Discussion of Proposal 9: Support as supplement only
Diff · History 851 Proposal 11: Start & End coords in infoboxes are always welcome: New
Diff · History 477 Discussion of Proposal 8: * '''Support''': (I'm not sure everyone reads P5 and P 8 as being exactly the same, Andy.) We do not, in my opinion, need rules which prevent us from adding coordinates. To the extent that some highways people such as F
Diff · History 313 Discussion of Proposal 7: #'''Weak support''
Diff · History 531 Discussion of Proposal 6: #'''Support with comments'''
Diff · History -21 Proposal 5: Status Quo: change format to #'''Comment'''
Diff · History 675 Discussion of Proposal 5: =====Discussion of Proposal 5=====
Diff · History 628 Discussion of Proposal 4: #'''Weak Support with caveats'''
Diff · History 332 Discussion of Proposal 3: #'''Oppose proposal, support start & end in infobox''': Start and end in infobox should not be the only way. Coords in a road junction list yield useful functionality through {{tl|GeoGroup}}. NO good reason to lose that
Diff · History 148 Discussion of Proposal 2: #'''Oppose''': Arbitrary limit for no good reason. --~~~~
Diff · History 4,076 Discussion of Proposal 10: Rs to Rschen in the collapsed section, r to Floydian
Diff · History 582 Discussion of Proposal 10: What about this use case:
Diff · History 10,533 Discussion of Proposal 10: r to rschen. you owe me at least a cup ot tea by now.
Diff · History 442 Discussion of Proposal 10: Mine is a simple request for Rschen to explain what he or she is proposing.
Diff · History 539 Proposal 10: Coordinate clutter: You do actually need to explain what you're talking about before soliciting comments on it.
Diff · History 823 Discussion of Proposal 10: The burden is on you
Diff · History 265 Discussion of Proposal 10: ::::*Bit difficult being anything like a gazetteer absent links to a map. A point you have not grasped, even though I did give you a pointer to the gazetteer page. --~~~~
Diff · History 213 Proposal 10: Coordinate clutter: ***Actually, according to Wikipedia:Five Pillars we ''are'' a gazetteer. You remember the five pillars, right? --~~~~
Diff · History 419 RFC on coordinates in highway articles: Sometimes, per Wikipedia's recent SOPA blockout, you need to put a rocket up people to get them to pay attention.
Diff · History 3,670 Discussion of Proposal 1: oppose
Diff · History 242 Overall discussion: And that's just dandy if you like the officially sanctioned map. Heaven forfend that we would want to give our users a choice in the matter.
Diff · History 818 Overall discussion: r to scott
Diff · History 1,100 Geocoding of highways: support
All times are in UTC.