Top edits to an page
All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.
Page | Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Highways (Log · Page History) |
User | Tagishsimon (Edit Counter· Top Edits) |
Total edits | 26 |
Minor edits | 0 (0%) |
(Semi-)automated edits | 0 (0%) |
Reverted edits | 0 (0%) |
atbe1 | 22.3 |
Added (bytes)2 | 30,711 |
Deleted (bytes) | -21 |
Minor edits
·
0 (0%)
Major edits
·
26 (100%)
(Semi-)automated edits
·
0 (0%)
Manual edits
·
26 (100%)
Reverted edits
·
0 (0%)
Unreverted edits
·
26 (100%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
Date | Links | Size | Edit summary |
---|---|---|---|
2012-02-23 00:22 | Diff · History | 696 | →Closure of RfC: clarification: ==The KML map link method, and tagging articles with KML missing== |
2012-02-08 19:42 | Diff · History | 649 | →Closure of RfC: clarification: *The logical inverse to a limit would generally be no limit, which you state in saying "There was no consensus to put a limit'. YMMV, of course. |
2012-01-26 21:57 | Diff · History | 508 | →Discussion of Proposal 9: I hazard the proposition that there are three classes of users w.r.t. maps linked from roads: those with no interest at all; those interested in seeing the whole road a la shapefile; and those interested is a specific p |
2012-01-26 21:21 | Diff · History | 1,181 | →Discussion of Proposal 9: Support as supplement only |
2012-01-20 03:32 | Diff · History | 851 | →Proposal 11: Start & End coords in infoboxes are always welcome: New |
2012-01-20 03:17 | Diff · History | 477 | →Discussion of Proposal 8: * '''Support''': (I'm not sure everyone reads P5 and P 8 as being exactly the same, Andy.) We do not, in my opinion, need rules which prevent us from adding coordinates. To the extent that some highways people such as F |
2012-01-20 03:12 | Diff · History | 313 | →Discussion of Proposal 7: #'''Weak support'' |
2012-01-20 03:09 | Diff · History | 531 | →Discussion of Proposal 6: #'''Support with comments''' |
2012-01-20 03:03 | Diff · History | -21 | →Proposal 5: Status Quo: change format to #'''Comment''' |
2012-01-20 02:58 | Diff · History | 675 | →Discussion of Proposal 5: =====Discussion of Proposal 5===== |
2012-01-20 02:52 | Diff · History | 628 | →Discussion of Proposal 4: #'''Weak Support with caveats''' |
2012-01-20 02:45 | Diff · History | 332 | →Discussion of Proposal 3: #'''Oppose proposal, support start & end in infobox''': Start and end in infobox should not be the only way. Coords in a road junction list yield useful functionality through {{tl|GeoGroup}}. NO good reason to lose that |
2012-01-20 02:43 | Diff · History | 148 | →Discussion of Proposal 2: #'''Oppose''': Arbitrary limit for no good reason. --~~~~ |
2012-01-20 02:39 | Diff · History | 4,076 | →Discussion of Proposal 10: Rs to Rschen in the collapsed section, r to Floydian |
2012-01-20 00:31 | Diff · History | 582 | →Discussion of Proposal 10: What about this use case: |
2012-01-20 00:03 | Diff · History | 10,533 | →Discussion of Proposal 10: r to rschen. you owe me at least a cup ot tea by now. |
2012-01-19 23:18 | Diff · History | 442 | →Discussion of Proposal 10: Mine is a simple request for Rschen to explain what he or she is proposing. |
2012-01-19 22:50 | Diff · History | 539 | →Proposal 10: Coordinate clutter: You do actually need to explain what you're talking about before soliciting comments on it. |
2012-01-19 22:19 | Diff · History | 823 | →Discussion of Proposal 10: The burden is on you |
2012-01-19 22:03 | Diff · History | 265 | →Discussion of Proposal 10: ::::*Bit difficult being anything like a gazetteer absent links to a map. A point you have not grasped, even though I did give you a pointer to the gazetteer page. --~~~~ |
2012-01-19 21:34 | Diff · History | 213 | →Proposal 10: Coordinate clutter: ***Actually, according to Wikipedia:Five Pillars we ''are'' a gazetteer. You remember the five pillars, right? --~~~~ |
2012-01-19 10:49 | Diff · History | 419 | →RFC on coordinates in highway articles: Sometimes, per Wikipedia's recent SOPA blockout, you need to put a rocket up people to get them to pay attention. |
2012-01-17 10:01 | Diff · History | 3,670 | →Discussion of Proposal 1: oppose |
2011-12-27 03:02 | Diff · History | 242 | →Overall discussion: And that's just dandy if you like the officially sanctioned map. Heaven forfend that we would want to give our users a choice in the matter. |
2011-12-27 00:50 | Diff · History | 818 | →Overall discussion: r to scott |
2010-07-23 09:25 | Diff · History | 1,100 | →Geocoding of highways: support |
All times are in UTC.