Suspected sockpuppets

• Dafranca77 (talk ·  · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

User names are an obvious give away and perfect match on editing habits. Talk^Woe90i 17:26, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User Dafranca and Dafranca77 are the same. I had problems conecting to Dafranca account so I created the Dafranca77 account. I didn't know the rules, I am new to wikipedia. The Dafranca77 was not used for influence decisions. Sorry for the inconvenience! Dafranca (talk) 17:45, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

I don't see a reason to run a checkuser here- it's pretty clear this is the same person. They need to pick one account and stick to it. Have you asked them how they ended up with two accounts? TNXMan 17:38, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(ec) This is just a harmless case of accidental creation of two parallel accounts by a newcomer, who otherwise seems to be a constructive and well-intentioned contributor. This happens often. The very obviousness of the identity proves that there has been no intent of deception here. No disruptive intent = no illicit sockpuppetry. There is no need to report such cases here; somebody should simply go to the editor and politely explain to them that it would be better to stick to just a single account. Fut.Perf. ☼ 17:42, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]