The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was promoted 02:59, 11 September 2007.

previous FAC

(self nom) This article has gone a long way since it's last FA nomination and an even longer way since it was rewritten. This article meets all of the criteria to be a featured article and I believe it should be a featured article. Wikidudeman ^(talk) 18:50, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Support: This article has come a long way and has been improved greatly. --Nealparr ^{(talk to me)} 19:01, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Support: It's an excellent, well-balanced article. --Malleus Fatuarum 00:41, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Support Clearly meets the FA criteria. VanTucky ^(talk) 00:48, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - prose is clear and good (well done), as well as comprehensive. Article does a good job of being neutral. cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 10:53, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Support: A pleasure to read. DSachan 19:10, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.