Val Valentino (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Merge with Breaking the Magician's Code: Magic's Biggest Secrets Finally Revealed the article in it's current state does not appear to be notable enough for a separate article. A majority of the article about Valentino's role as the Masked Magician on the TV show. This issue was raised at a recent RM. Dr vulpes (Talk) 23:44, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Magic. Dr vulpes (Talk) 23:44, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Merge to Breaking the Magician's Code: Magic's Biggest Secrets Finally Revealed. 162 etc. (talk) 02:45, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television, Brazil, California, and Nevada. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:57, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep – The subject was highly notable in Brazil at the end of the 90s/beginning of the 2000s, and to this day has had some repercussions in the mainstream media (especially on Rede Globo). [1], [2], [3], [4]. Svartner (talk) 14:56, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  These articles talk about his health problems (which are not encyclopedically notable) and his 90s TV show (which already has an article.) 162 etc. (talk) 18:18, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  There are several other things about him, like this article from 1999 [5], or about the return of his show on pay TV channels. [6], [7]. Maybe he hasn't been as successful outside of Brazil, but there's definitely WP:SIGCOV here. Svartner (talk) 05:59, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  How do we feel about merging this article with Breaking the Magician's Code: Magic's Biggest Secrets Finally Revealed? Dr vulpes (Talk) 06:14, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Do we really need the space? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 240F:CA:2CE5:1:9430:B51E:9FD9:F2BF (talk) 04:28, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 03:47, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Opinion is divided between editors arguing to Keep and those anticipating a Merger.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:21, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]