The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was No consensus. Cbrown1023 22:09, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thorr's Hammer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) - (View log)

Non notable band, attempted CSDA7 and was rejected MECU≈talk 20:25, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See previous nom at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thorr's Hammer. --MECU≈talk 20:27, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. Possible bad faith nomination, as someone clearly has something against Southern Lord Records (see user's other nominations and mass-tagging (almost tag per minute) with {{db-a7}}). From user's reply on my talk page: I was asked by an admin on IRC to go through Southern Lord Records and mark the ones I didn't feel made it. Many of the speedy tags added by this user were ridiculous and might have qualified for abuse of tags. [1] [2] [3] Seems like a case of Wikipedia:Speedy keep. I'll try to reference these articles later, but there are 18 of them so it will take some time. Prolog 20:50, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Keep - dposse 23:20, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment This doesn't fit the pattern; this band was together for only 6 weeks, produced only 1 album (although discography says 2 = internal contradiction) and there is no indication that it really does meet WP:MUSIC.
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletions. -- SkierRMH 06:31, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep as per previous discussion. Meets WP:MUSIC #5 with Stephen O'Malley and Greg Anderson, but the content could probably serve better merged somewhere, but I don't know to which article. Prolog 01:49, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete unless sourced... Addhoc 15:12, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.