Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/La dama de Chez Maxim's
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep in light of improvements and no support for deletion beyond nominator. (non-admin closure) Dclemens1971 (talk) 21:24, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- La dama de Chez Maxim's (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Tagged for sourcing since 2019. Unreferenced other than IMDb. Not clear this passes WP:GNG or WP:NFILM.4meter4 (talk) 19:46, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. 4meter4 (talk) 19:46, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:53, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
- Keep: Added things. Seems to meet the requirements for notability. -Mushy Yank. 21:52, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
- @Cavarrone Hello, any thoughts? (Pinging a competent user), -Mushy Yank. 21:52, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. -Mushy Yank. 21:52, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. -Mushy Yank. 05:46, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
- Keep. Notable director, actors. Good recent additions. I'd imagine there was a lot of contemporary coverage. Lord Cornwallis (talk) 22:51, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
- Comment - Subject lacks substantial independent coverage. Maxcreator (talk) 10:35, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
- Keep in view of the numerous reliable book sources added to the article since nomination so that deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 00:02, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.