The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:10, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Giusy Di Martino (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unable to find significant coverage in any reliable sources independent of the subject of this unsourced BLP. Please note that anyone that registers can edit Anime News Network so it should not be considered a reliable source. J04n(talk page) 20:31, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. --J04n(talk page) 20:31, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. —J04n(talk page) 20:31, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. —J04n(talk page) 20:31, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as per nom, wasn't able to find reliable sources providing substantial coverage, but if other folks can, that'd be swell. Note that the Anime and Manga Wikiproject has a really great list providing information about the reliability of related sources. --j⚛e decker^{talk to me} 20:39, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - I want to clarify that Anime News Network's news stories and reviews are written by paid staff members who are overseen by professional editors, and the news stories and reviews there are certainly a reliable source. It is only the encyclopedia portion of Anime News Network that is editable by any registered user and would not qualify as a reliable source. I think only the encylopedia portion of the site has information on this person (and thus the coverage wouldn't be considered reliable), but I didn't want people to be confused by J04n's comment and think that the entire site was unreliable. Calathan (talk) 21:12, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you, I will try to be more precise in the future. J04n(talk page) 21:58, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: CSE hits. I didn't bother doing much cleanup because I don't know Italian and what's what they all seem to be. (I also agree with Calathan's correction. ANN is our single most important RS; so it's also important people - like Bread Ninja (talk · contribs) already has - not get any mistaken ideas.) --Gwern (contribs) 22:14 11 February 2011 (GMT)
• Comment - It of course means nothing per guidelines, but it is indicative that while Giusy di Martino (note proper capitalization) is mentioned 12 times on it.wiki, all for her voice acting, she has no article there. —Quasirandom (talk) 22:37, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Joe's comment.--Milowent • ^talkblp-r 15:53, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - concur with nominator - based on the above {{findsources}} searches, there appears to be a lack of significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject. PhilKnight (talk) 18:19, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.