The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:32, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Donal Greene (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD contested by Special:Contributions/SENTRY ROBOVAC5000. Initial concern was: Poorly referenced BLP. Despite being of start-class length, there is no explanation of why the individual meets the GNG. Despite de-PRODding, no explanation has been given. —WFC— 10:28, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:28, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:28, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 18:20, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG. GiantSnowman 18:21, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - having only played in semi-professional league fails NFOOTBALL, does not appear to have done anything to be noteworthy outside of that, no indepth coverage.--ClubOranje^T 10:55, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Non-notable footballer. Fails WP:NFOOTBALL and nothing has been found to pass WP:GNG. Argyle 4 Life^talk 03:18, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.