Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dawn (demo)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 00:53, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
- Dawn (demo) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) It is unsourced and has no in-depth sources in any major search product. I would entertain a redirect to GeForce, where it might be a useful search term, but there isn't enough to substantiate its own, independent article. If someone finds more (non-English and offline) sources, please {{ping}} me. czar 17:45, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
- Delete demos almost never gain notability unless they lead to a best-selling game (and even then, who cares about the demo?). Can't find any indication that this was anything other than a small project. Primefac (talk) 18:03, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
- Not delete was important milestone (note the editwar, PrimeFac just wants to punish me for not agreeing with him) - please disregard that vote should there be a tie) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.196.204.46 (talk) 19:18, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Searches turned up nothing to show that this meets notability criteria as per WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 20:09, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:23, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:23, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:23, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
- Delete as I'm not seeing better improvement here. SwisterTwister talk 07:02, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.