The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. nomination withdrawn after article improvement - no votes to delete. (non-admin closure) Off2riorob (talk) 00:12, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArcSoft ShowBiz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable software stub. Marked as single-source since 2007, the single source is link dead. Three incoming wikilinks, the software producer (which has the software in a list, with no content), a disambiguation page and a list page. PROD contested in 2009. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:11, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — — alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 12:58, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep PC magazine has one of its editors review it and the bundle it comes with. [1] "On the video-editing front, ArcSoft's ShowBiz has evolved into a competent editor that's generally more usable than Dazzle's MovieStar program, providing more configuration controls, better preview features, and a much greater range of fun effects. Integration with MyDVD is simple: When you're ready to render your project, you select Create / My DVD Project and ShowBiz outputs a file that's automatically inserted into MyDVD." I'm going to add that to the article and then look through the hordes of other sources a simple Google news archive search shows. Dream Focus 05:40, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I added a link to a New York Times article stating it "it was one of the three most dominant bundled titles" and reviews from two reliable sources. Dream Focus 06:02, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• withdraw nomination Based on recent edits and references, withdraw the nomination, it now looks notable to me. Stuartyeates (talk) 06:48, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.