The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to Michigan Tech Huskies football, 1920–1942. Yes, aware it's a redlink. However creation doesn't require continuing this discussion, which has stalled. Star Mississippi 02:29, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

1924 Michigan Mines football team (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. This was a less-than-average season (three games played, zero wins), unsupported by WP:SIGCOV, and sourced solely to the school's web site. At best per WP:NSEASONS, this might be suitable for grouping as part of a "decade" article on the Michigan Mines football program in the 1920s. Cbl62 (talk) 17:19, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related page because it relates to an equally less-than-average season is is also unsupported by SIGCOV.

1926 Michigan Mines football team (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

• @TheDiamoneMinor: For examples of season articles on the Michigan Mines/Tech football program that can and should be created, please see 1974 Michigan Tech Huskies football team (undefeated championship season). Season articles need to be supported by WP:SIGCOV in reliable, independent sources. Cbl62 (talk) 17:32, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• @Cbl62: Perhaps a merger of all these early Michigan Mines/Tech football articles into something like Michigan Tech Huskies football, 1920–1942, a la Temple Owls football, 1900–1909, would be a better option than deletion? Jweiss11 (talk) 18:13, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am not opposed to some reasonable alternative to deletion, but keeping these as stand-alone articles does not appear to be viable. Cbl62 (talk) 18:22, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: American football and Michigan. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:18, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:42, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:24, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. More opinions are welcome.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Timothytyy (talk) 04:45, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• I'd support a merger to Michigan Tech Huskies football, 1920–1942 like Jweiss suggested. BeanieFan11 (talk) 22:41, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Also the last game wasn't played on November 7, 1924 because the result is already in a newspaper on sunday November 2, 1924 and also on monday November 3, 1924 with that exact result. Themanwithnowifi (talk) 09:10, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Reply re "merge" proposal. @Jweiss11: @BeanieFan11: @TheDiamoneMinor: @Themanwithnowifi: As noted above, I am not opposed to an alternative to deletion, but the proposed merger target doesn't exist. Does someone want to create and source Michigan Tech Huskies football, 1920–1942? Absent that, how is a closer supposed to agree to the "merge" proposal? Cbl62 (talk) 10:30, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.