Thanks for your contributions to Sam Holland (recording and mixing engineer). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CycloneYoris ^talk! 22:34, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Zdrada, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• How to avoid a conflict of interest

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! CycloneYoris ^talk! 22:35, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Zdrada. Thank you for your work on Donald R. Hamann. Another editor, Ldm1954, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Please expand, for instance with an info ox scientist.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ldm1954}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Ldm1954 (talk) 11:19, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Zdrada. Thank you for your work on Masaki Takata. Another editor, Ldm1954, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

he is nitab.e, but the page needs a little work. Please add sources which are more independent. Currently they are all too closely associated with him. Also, please try and find a way to cite his publication record better as it is strong. I will also suggest adding a picture of him to the infobox.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ldm1954}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Ldm1954 (talk) 12:05, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Zdrada. Thank you for your work on Masaki Takata. Another editor, Ldm1954, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

You have added sources that do not validate the states. That is highly inappropriate.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ldm1954}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Ldm1954 (talk) 18:45, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Costas Stoumpos. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ... discospinster _talk 03:16, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Henry I. Smith. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ... discospinster _talk 03:17, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Zdrada. Thank you for your work on Dan W. Urry. Another editor, Ldm1954, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Please add sources for his awards, that is very important.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ldm1954}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Ldm1954 (talk) 13:18, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Masaki Takata. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ldm1954 (talk) 09:19, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Zdrada. Thank you for your work on Nicoleta Nedelcu. Another editor, Ldm1954, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

@Zdrada, you have created enough BKPs of notable scientists that you should know that she is far from meeting any of the WP:NPROF criteria. WP:TOOSOON by many years.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ldm1954}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Ldm1954 (talk) 04:54, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comment. Yes as you may have noticed I am interested in such topics and I thought that the National Academy of Sciences prize gives an opportunity to match WP:NACADEMIC.

I'll try to do some more googling and rewrite the article. Zdrada (talk) 09:19, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Nicoleta Nedelcu. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it is not close to meeting academic notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ldm1954 (talk) 04:56, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Henry I. Smith, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ldm1954 (talk) 22:47, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Nicoleta Nedelcu. Thanks! Ldm1954 (talk) 17:47, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Zdrada. Thank you for your work on Veljko Radeka. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for adding this page for Radeka, with notability established through the set of awards and regonition through professional socities, including the IEEE Marie Sklodowska-Curie Award. When recreating articles, remember that you can re-use references by naming them; linking through Wikidata can also help to link the page to other resources (like Scopus).

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 17:54, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]