Hi Vitorperrut555! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! --Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 18:02, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks but i experienced user in Wikipedia in portugueses and i starting to edit in english now since 2023. Vitorperrut555 (talk) 18:38, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Vitorperrut555! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 14:10, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

The file File:Legiao Urbana Angras dos Reis.jpeg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-free music video screenshot bing used in a WP:DECORATIVE manner in Angra dos Reis (song)#Music video which fails WP:NFCC#8. Non-free screenshots can sometimes be used when they are themselves the subject of sourced critical commentary due to some technique or other reason related to the video's production, but they're not really allowed just to "show" a scene from the video or support a plot summary of the video as is being done in this case.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:18, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Marchjuly: This is a fair use.

I'm a Brazilian editor in PT wiki who understand the PT rules, but not the En Wiki (here).

So, how this will be deleted if i used the YouTube's video source. Vitorperrut555 (talk) 14:39, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what PT Wikipedia's policy is regrding the use of non-free content, but Wikipedia's non-free content use policy is quite strict by design and is not exactly the same as fair use. In addition, the YouTube source you're citing for the video seems like a problem per WP:YOUTUBE and WP:COPYLINK since it doesn't appear the YouTube channel hosting the music videois under the control of the original copyright holder of the music video. So, this could be an additional problem with the file related to non-free content use criterion #4 (see also WP:NFC#Meeting the previous publication criterion for details). Given that there are multiple non-free content use policy related issues with this file, each of them is going to need to be addressed before the file is allowed to be kept.

Since the file has only been proposed for deletion, you can WP:DEPROD you like. I wouldn't, however, suggest you do that unless you're absolutely convinced that the way the file is being used complies with Wikipedia's non-free content use policy and are quite sure you'll be able to establish a WP:CONSENSUS among other Wikipedians at WP:FFD, which is where the file will end up being discussed.

For what it's worth, I don't propose non-free files for deletion unless I'm quite sure their use is a clear violation of relevant Wikipedia policy. If you feel I'm mistaken and the file's use should be discussed further for strong policy-based reasons, then that's OK and you can deprod the file in good faith. If, on the other hand, you simply deprod the file as a last ditch attempt to save the file from deletion regardless of relevant policy (i.e. WP:LIKEIMAGINE type of reasons), it will likely only prolonged the inevitable deletion of the file and could possibly make others question your understanding of Wikipedia's non-free content policy. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:09, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

THX Vitorperrut555 (talk) 01:16, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Howdy!
Thanks for taking the time to translate my user script into Portuguese! I want to agree with you on a release schedule for when you'll update the Portuguese translation. I have some ideas:

1. Every release (very unlikely and might take a lot of time): you would update the translated version on every release.
2. Every feature update (most likely the best idea): you would update every feature update (so e.g. 0.1.0 -> 0.2.0 or 0.9.0 -> 1.0.0 but not 0.1.0 -> 0.1.1) These version numbers may never exist, I'm just using them as examples.

When an update is made upstream, you wouldn't have to update the translated version immediately (I'm not that picky). It's fine if it takes a little extra time (e.g. few days to a week or a week and a half) I would also like to standardize with you how you would translate new versions so I can know what to tell future translators. I have devised a few methods:

1. Use a translation system: I might create the enwiki version with placeholders for strings, and it could fill in from files for different languages in my userspace (e.g. one for EN and one for PT). Then the one hosted on PTwiki could become a redirect or one-code import from the one on ENWiki. Possibly users could see different languages per the wiki they are browsing (unlikely unless I can find a way to do that) or have them select a language when they first use the userscript and save that in a global config file of some sort (so it would work across wikis)
2. Copy and paste code, but change variable names and strings
3. Copy and paste code, but change only strings (leave variables intact)

Either way, please watch the page at User:TheTechie/UserTools/changelog so you know when I release a new version.
Please let me know which method for both you prefer! If you reply here, please ping me. Thanks, TheTechie@enwiki (she/they | talk) 04:36, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@TheTechie Watched! Thanks. Vitorperrut555 (talk) 14:54, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a preference for each method? TheTechie@enwiki (she/they | talk) 16:58, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@TheTechie I will try some methods Vitorperrut555 (talk) 21:05, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Which? Please let me know so I can plan accordingly. TheTechie@enwiki (she/they | talk) 22:29, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@TheTechie I can't use the translation system because i got partial block for creating bad articles. So i will the 2 or 3. Vitorperrut555 (talk) 20:05, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	I love the designs on your userpage! Loadmarble (talk) 01:55, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article King Air F90 prefix PS-FEM plane crash in 2025 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lack of WP:Notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:31, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@DatBot How? The crash has notability Vitorperrut555 (talk) 00:40, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]