Speedway

user talk:pauliesnug



Women in Red February 2024

Women in Red | February 2024, Volume 10, Issue 2, Numbers 293, 294, 297, 298


Online events:

Announcement

  • Please let other wikiprojects know about our February Black women event.

Tip of the month:

  • AllAfrica can now be searched on the ProQuest tab at the WP Library.

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk 20:10, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red March 2024

Women in Red | March 2024, Volume 10, Issue 3, Numbers 293, 294, 299, 300, 301


Online events:

Announcements

Tip of the month:

  • When creating a new article, check various spellings, including birth name, married names
    and pseudonyms, to be sure an article doesn't already exist.

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk 20:23, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red April 2024

Women in Red | April 2024, Volume 10, Issue 4, Numbers 293, 294, 302, 303, 304


Online events:

Announcements

  • The second round of "One biography a week" begins in April as part of #1day1woman.

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk 19:43, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Freya Holmér (July 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 19:48, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Pauliesnug! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 19:48, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-33

MediaWiki message delivery 23:19, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-34

MediaWiki message delivery 00:50, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-35

MediaWiki message delivery 20:29, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-36

MediaWiki message delivery 01:04, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-37

MediaWiki message delivery 18:49, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-38

MediaWiki message delivery 23:59, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Freya Holmér (September 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 08:57, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Freya Holmér has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Freya Holmér. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 18:32, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
thank you so much! pauliesnug (message / contribs) 22:55, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

National Archives EOs

Hi Paulinesnug.

can you please confirm that you actually retrieved the executive orders for the second Trump administration in 2025 from the National Archives? their website states that they stopped hosting executive orders in 2017. Perhaps you are referring to the Federal Register, operated by the Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration? however they have not yet published any of the orders you have listed.

thank you. Geordannik (talk) 03:51, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, currently the records are from https://www.whitehouse.gov/, and they will be updated with EO publications from the Federal Record once they are published. pauliesnug (message / contribs) 13:20, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Quelle: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Pauliesnug