Hello, MrVC25, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Best practices for editors with close associations
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Simplified Manual of Style
• The Teahouse, our help forum for new editors

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, visit the Teahouse, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Moxy🍁 04:32, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Brother, I need help I made a unblock request and I don't think the dudes gonna respond MrVC25 (talk) 07:19, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. Moxy🍁 10:07, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What page? MrVC25 (talk) 04:34, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing and personal attacks. Next edit that is anything other than constructive will see you blocked. Over to you. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:31, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MrVC25. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template), including links or details of reliable sources that support your suggestions;
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:32, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Antonio Riano Borges, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Antonio Riano Borges and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Antonio Riano Borges during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Moxy🍁 21:30, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Brother it is draft im still working on it can you guys leave me alone? MrVC25 (talk) 04:45, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you disagree with the wp:proposed deletion (prod), just remove the whole template. Anyone should be able to do so. See WP:DEPROD. The next step for the nominator would be wp:AfD which can be a use of time. Removing just the reason would be confusing to other readers. You could add more content to the article which could help. If it's not notable, please don't remove it. Did you read the reasons for it being prod-ed in the first place? Thank you Adakiko (talk) 04:42, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Brother I mistakes and only delete half MrVC25 (talk) 04:48, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not post to my talk page again. Meters (talk) 06:07, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Stop posting on my user page MrVC25 (talk) 06:07, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for continued disruptive editing and belligerence beyond final warning.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:57, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can you read my unban request? MrVC25 (talk) 07:17, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MrVC25 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I think I should be unblocked because the reason I got blocked doesn't make any sense because when they gave me my final warning I made a legit edit to with a reference and sources and they still said it was disruptive and I feel like this was unwarranted and a personal attack as I stopped at my final warning and did a correct addition with sources and got blocked all the other edits were me explaining myself and stopping a page from being deleted while following full procedure this feels more like a personal attack and Indefinite? really at least it could've been temporary also please unblock me asap I need to add more information to a page so it doesn't get deletedMrVC25 (talk) 05:11, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

See WP:NOTTHEM. This does not address the concerns about your actions or poor attitude. 331dot (talk) 10:47, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MrVC25 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

The previous reason my unblock request was denied was because I didn't address the concerns about my poor attitude as for what I have to say about that I was being stupid I acted like a little bitch when I should've just looked for references I know I was a Jackass but I still think the indefinite block was too far also I got blocked for making a legit edit and I became more disruptive by meters telling me to stop talking on his page and I did MrVC25 (talk) 06:49, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I cannot get past the statement you think the block was too far. As far as I can see, it was entirely reasonable. I am declining your request. PhilKnight (talk) 08:20, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

MrVC25 (talk) 06:49, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]