Archives

Archive 1 (May 2014–June 2015) Archive 2 (July–December 2015) Archive 3 (January–June 2016) Archive 4 (July–December 2016) Archive 5 (January–June 2017) Archive 6 (July–December 2017) Archive 7 (January–June 2018) Archive 8 (July–December 2018) Archive 9 (January–June 2019) Archive 10 (July–December 2019) Archive 11 (January–June 2020) Archive 12 (July–December 2020) Archive 13 (January–June 2021) Archive 14 (July–December 2021) Archive 15 (January–June 2022) Archive 16 (July–December 2022) Archive 17 (January–June 2023) Archive 18 (July–December 2023) Archive 19 (January–June 2024) Archive 20 (July–December 2024)

		The New Page Reviewer's Iron Award
		This award is given in recognition to GTrang for conducting 486 article reviews in 2024. Thank you so much for all your excellent work. Keep it up! Hey man im josh (talk) 18:13, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Hey man im josh: I have actually made 576 article reviews (and 8 redirect reviews) in 2024. But thanks for the award anyway. GTrang (talk) 04:24, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@GTrang: My understanding is the query used counts the current state of the articles marked as reviewed, some of which, based on your log, are red links or were turned into redirects. Hey man im josh (talk) 23:57, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I noticed you marked FAIRR Initiative as reviewed (it's temporarily on my watchlist from tagging), but didn't remove the notability tag. If you determined that the organization cleared the appropriate notability guideline, would you mind removing the maintenance tag when you mark it as reviewed? Thanks! Dclemens1971 (talk) 04:15, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Dclemens1971: I have nominated FAIRR Initiative for deletion. Note that the article had already been removed from Special:NewPagesFeed, so I had to re-add it to the feed before using the page curation toolbar to nominate it at AfD. GTrang (talk) 04:21, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a bit confused. On the one hand, you've marked Draft:2030 under review, presumably with the intention of accepting it, but you have reverted the article existence to restore the redirect. If there is an article that could be there, it should be kept and (if necessary) expanded with material from the draft. On that note, though, I am not seeing any copy/paste pagemove from the article to the draft; the lead sentence is a stock sentence that every year has (along with the sidebar) so I do not think that really counts as a "copy/paste". I'm also not seeing a ton of similar content between 4 Nov of the article and 17 Dec of the draft. I guess I'm just looking for some clarity. Primefac (talk) 08:17, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		The New Page Patroller's Barnstar
		This award is given in recognition to GTrang for accumulating at least 100 points during the January 2025 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions helped play a part in the 16,000+ articles and 14,000+ redirects reviewed (for a total of 19,791.2 points) completed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Hey man im josh (talk) 19:31, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		Rack and pinion Award
		This award is given in recognition to GTrang for accumulating at least 15 points during each week of the January 2025 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions played a part in the 16,000+ articles and 14,000+ redirects reviewed (for a total of 19,791.2 points) during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Hey man im josh (talk) 19:47, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]