Welcome!

Hello, Belissarius, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  -- Longhair 02:35, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Belissarius! Thank you for your contributions related to Poland. You may be interested in visiting Portal:Poland/Poland-related Wikipedia notice board, joining our discussions and sharing your creations with us.

-- _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk}  05:15, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just found the article Tadeusz Chyliński and I saw that you had begun the work. It would also require a finish. Care to do it? --MoRsE 20:04, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Panie Belissarius, napisalem ten artykul jako czesc serii o zabytkowych kosciolach zalozone jako 'polskie' parafie w Chicago w anglojezycznej wikipedii. Jest to wazne z tegoz wlasnie powodu ze sa one czesto pod niebezbieczenstwem zamkniecia lub nawet czasem i zburzenia. Dzieje sie to z przyczyn przemieszczenia sie polskojezycznej ludnosci na inne czesci aglomeracji miejskiej, wysoki koszt ich utrzymania i wtapiania potomkow ich zalozycieli w ogolnym amerykanskim spoleczenstwie. Zachecam do przejrzenia artykulu pt. "Polish Cathedral" ktorym jest cala seria moich artykulow na ten temat----Orestek 17:53, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Czesc Belissarius, z tej strony klania sie Orestek. Jeste czlonkiem zarzadu towarzystwa historycznego Jefferson Park, i organizujemy wyklad Polsko-Amerykanskiego Profesora Dominika Pacygi. Napisal sporo ciekaych ksiazek, z ktorych najwybitniejsza jest o polskich robotnikach na poludniu miasta, a takze wykladal przez semestr na uniwersytecie w Oksfordzie. Choc wyklad bedzie w jezyku angielskim, chcielismy wypromowac spotkanie takze wsrod polonii. Napisalem pare emaili do Dziennika Zwiazkowego oraz Kuriera Codziennego, ale bez odpowiedzi. Ponownie wyslalem je dzisiaj na twoja skrzynke oraz redakji Dziennika.

Dzieki za pomoc!--Orestek (talk) 18:08, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dzien Dobry Bellissarius, Z tej strony znow klania sie Orestek. Mam nadzieje ze pan sie nieco wyzdrowial po tragicznym wypadku w zeszlym roku. Zwracam sie do ciebie Bellisarius bo pisze historie dla serii wydawniczej "Images of America" nt. ulicy Milwaukee w Chicago w jez. Angielskim. Sa to ksiazki ktore historie sa opowiadane poprzez starych czarno-bialych zdjec dobrej jakosci. Pare lat temu pani Victoria Granacka napisala ksiazka z tej serii pt "Chicago's Polish Downtown", a moja pierwsza ksiazka z tej serii o dzielnicy Portage Park wyjdzie pod koniec czerwca. Chcialbym w tej historii o ulicy Milwaukee pokazac o polskosci tejze ulicy ale wymagania serii sa takie ze potrzebne sa do tego stare zdjecia. Czy jest mozliwosc skorzystania z archiwow Dziennika Zwiazkowego lub pracownikow gazety? Na przyklad w ksiazce pana Bialasiewicza pt "W kregu chicagowskiej Polonii" na stronie 592 jest przepiekne zdjecie restauracji pana Lenarda przy 1166 N. Milwaukee przy takim zdjeciu moge napisac troche o historii panstwa Lenardow jako dzialaczy polonijnych. Wymagania wydawcy na jakosc zdjec do tej serii jest surowa, ale za to jest bardzo popularna na rynku amerykanskim. Dziekuje za wszelka pomoc w tej sprawie--Orestek (talk) 20:40, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Belissarius, I am working on the Pope John Paul II article in order to improve it and raise it to ‘Good Article’ and hopefully ‘Featured Article’ status. The article is currently at Peer Review So, I though I would invite you to take a look. Any help to improve the article would be much appreciated. Best Regards Marek.69 ^talk 03:44, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the quick response. No hurry with this, whenever you have some time will be great. :-) Marek.69 ^talk 04:25, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Belissarius, I've left a response to your message on my talkpage. -- Marek.69 ^talk 22:57, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Again, I've left a you response on my talkpage. -- Marek.69 ^talk 17:09, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

We are now dividing our members into active, semi-active (have not edited a Poland-related article in more then three months) and inactive (have not edited at all for three months or more). You have not been active on Wikipedia in the past month and I see you've not edited any Poland-related articles in in several months; we are moving you to semi-active members category. Please consider participating in our project activities again in the future, we would love to work more closely with you again! --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 18:26, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Super. Jak bedziesz mial chwilke, dodaj cos o swojej specjalizacji/zainteresowaniach przy liscie uczestnikow projektu - bedziemy wiedzieli o czym cie informowac/w czym prosic o pomoc :) --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 00:02, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ja tez niekiedy pisze cos na pl wiki, ale wydaje mi sie, ze pisanie na en wiki jest pozyteczniejsze - raz, bo edukuje sie swiat o Polsce, dwa, bo en wiki lepiej pokorywa nie-polskie tematy, i mozna wspolpracowac z nie-polskimi edytorami... :) Wiec od czasu do czasu bede staral sie ciebie zrekrutwac na en wiki, zwlaszcza ze jest wielu edytorow piszacych o Polsce po polsku, ale niewielu potrafi dobrze pisac po angielsku - dlatego mamy tak malo edytorow na en wiki... --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 00:05, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nie takie głupie bo na en wiki nie jest to uzywane z prawego gornego rogu. Po prostu tworzysz go sobie sam i linkujesz skad chcesz, ja mam moj w User:Piotrus/Sandbox. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 04:39, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Powinno dzialac jak na pl wiki. Prosze: User:Belissarius/Brudnopis. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 05:15, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Osobiscie nie jestem zwolennikiem brudnopisow do pisania artykulow (ja uzywam mojego jako notatnika). Za czesto zdarza sie, ze edytorzy nie skoncza pracy i na pol gotowy artykul jest zapomniany dopoki ktos go nie odkryje i nie przeniesie do mainspace, gdzie czesto trzeba go polaczayc z tym co juz ktos inny napisal. Ja wole pisac w mainspace, w koncu wedlug definicji projekty wszystkie artykulu to szkice "w trakcie". --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 05:26, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rzuc mi linkiem, ale szczerze mowiac, wolalbym patrzyc na to co sie pisze w mainie, a nie w brudnopisach - ja na prawde mam z nimi zle doswiadczenia... --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 18:43, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wyglada dobrze, dalej sugeruje prace w mainie, a nie w brudnopisie :) --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 23:17, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Czytam :) Co sugeruje: 1) zglosic artykul do T:TDYK (latwo sie to robi, na pl wiki nie moglem wyczaic jak sie to robi, ale na en prosto :D). 2) zglosic do WP:MILCON. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 01:02, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dokladnie. MILCON to ranking edytorow piszacych o historii wojskowosci; WP:MILHIST to chyba najwiekszy i najaktywniejszy wikiprojekt na en wiki. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 01:16, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dzien dobry i witam Pana w Angielskiej Wiki. Mam mala prosbe i moze Pan by mogl mi w tym pomoc. Probuje zrobic cos pozadnego z artykulem o Ekonomicznym traktacie Kopernika Monetae cudendae ratio i nie moge nic znalezc jako ten tytul pracy przetlumaczyc dokladnie z Laciny na Polski a wlasciwie na Angielski. Z tego co znalazlem to zazwyczaj to sie tlumaczy na "O Monecia" albo cos w tym rodzaju ale to nie jest zbyt dokladne (podobnie tlumaczenia na Angielski tez sa wymyslone z nikad). W slownikach Lacinsko-Polskich albo Lacinsko-Angielski nie moge znalezc slowa "cudendae" ale to wyglada na cos w rodzaju "Jak Bic Monete" itp. Zauwazylem, ze Pan ma znaczek "la-2" wiec pomyslalem, ze moze Pan by mogl mi w tym pomoc. Jak to wlasciwie przetlumaczyc na Polski albo Angielski? Dziekuje z gory.radek (talk) 07:42, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dziekuje!radek (talk) 21:31, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Don't forget to nominate it to DYK and MILCON! --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 03:19, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure what the best hook be - you wrote the article, I am certain you can find an interesting fact from it to mention! --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 02:55, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem and I'll try to help out if there are any concerns mentioned with TDYK.radek (talk) 04:44, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'll hold off and let you do it because my knowledge of the subject is pretty superficial. There's some more grammar changes that need to be done and I'll do it later.radek (talk) 01:54, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Przetlumaczylem Konopke z Polskiej Wiki i dodalem to i owo ze znalazionego w sieci. Poprawki, dodatki, uzupelnienia itp. mile widziane. Takze, nie wiem czy zajscie pod Slonimem w ktorym Konopka byl wziety do niewoli to "Bitwa" albo "Potyczka" ale w tej ksiazce Nawrota - [1] - jest dosc szczegolowy opis wiec moze by warto zrobic z tego artykul.radek (talk) 04:14, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes! I saw some of that - his capture seemed strange even to the Russian general that got him, and then before that there is the mess up at Battle of Yevenes you wrote about which looks very much like what happened at Slonim. Nawrot goes into that in the footnotes to some extent ( for example pg. 632, footnote 26). It seems Konopka claimed he was betrayed while Czaplic ... the online version cuts off but I'm guessing it says "Czaplic posadzal generala chyba... o pijanstwo" or something like that. Please take your time.radek (talk) 05:23, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment has a nice table. What's practical to know is this: FA and GA articles need to go through a review; other classes are usually assigned by any interested editor, however the most active projects have their own teams which make B-class assessments as well. WP:MILHIST for example is one of those projects; unfortunately WP:POLAND is not - I've proposed creating our own B-class review section twice, and never got a single reply :( Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment may offer you more advice, feel free to ask questions on their talk page too. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 18:23, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Polish 1st Light Cavalry Regiment of the Imperial Guard at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Shubinator (talk) 06:09, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I can't find the hook fact for your Battles of Medieval Poland nomination at DYK. If the fact's already there, can you show me where it is? Otherwise, please add it in to the article with an inline citation. Thanks, Shubinator (talk) 02:52, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nie znam go wiec nie wiem (chodz duzo tego wsadzil). Some editors are really strict on everything having citations, much more so than on Polish wiki. I think the guideline is different too - on Polish wiki it's just a "suggestion", here it's more or less required for any B class and above article. It's probably a way of being helpful. I'll try to find some online sources too (those tend to be more gladly seen because they can be easily verified).radek (talk) 04:55, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On April 24, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Polish 1st Light Cavalry Regiment of the Imperial Guard, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Shubinator (talk) 21:48, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, looks like one of your others has already been verified. Keep up the good work! Shubinator (talk) 00:50, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On April 30, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Battle of Yevenes, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Royalbroil 11:55, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The April 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:29, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't really understand what made you unhappy? If you resubmit Polish 1st Light Cavalry Regiment of the Imperial Guard, it should be rated as B-class easily, and GA/A-class likely. Battles of Medieval Poland is probably good enough for B-class, may need a few more refs for GA/A-class. Overall, I think you are doing an excellent job, but I will stress the importance of inline citations - the fact that other encyclopedias don't have them simply means that they are less useful, and this is one of the reasons Wikipedia is in the process of replacing them. And certainly, your articles and contributions are much welcome here. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 06:33, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I actually don't know the details since I never tried to get any of mine up to GA. Piotrus is probably the expert here. But I think you would nominate it over at GA/History: [2] (I'm not sure if Military History does this separately). Then a bunch of people will complain about lots of things that you'll think they shouldn't be complaining about. Then it will be a bit more work. Then more complaining. Then more work again. And then hopefully it will make it. It actually doesn't seem that different than publishing in journals. In terms of the criteria for this particular article the two potential problems I anticipate is that in some places the English prose can still be improved - though this would be just one more over all copy edit or so - and maybe more concern about the citations. In particular the fact that lots of them come from the same, offline, Polish source - Brandys, Kozietulski (for below GA class reviewers will often take this on good faith but it's a big jump from B-class to GA). It'll probably be necessary to look for at least some English language sources (online would be better) that can back up some of the B&K, even it's just for some of the mundane stuff. I'll keep an eye on it and do some more copy edits and look for sources after the weekend.radek (talk) 09:07, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The May 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:12, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The June 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:24, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The July 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:52, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 12 September!
Many thanks,  Roger Davies ^talk 04:24, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The August 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:10, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Voting in the Military history WikiProject coordinator election has now started. The aim is to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of sixteen candidates. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on 26 September!
For the coordinators,  Roger Davies ^talk 22:09, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The September 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:26, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As a member of the Military history WikiProject or World War I task force, you may be interested in competing in the Henry Allingham International Contest! The contest aims to improve article quality and member participation within the World War I task force. It will also be a step in preparing for Operation Great War Centennial, the project's commemorative effort for the World War I centenary.

If you would like to participate, please sign up by 11 November 2009, 00:00, when the first round is scheduled to begin! You can sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 17:47, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The October 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 17:47, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The November 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:52, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The December 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:36, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The January 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:58, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 8 March 2010! More information on coordinatorship may be found on the coordinator academy course and in the responsibilities section on the coordinator page.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:04, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The February 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:58, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for the Military history WikiProject coordinator elections has opened; all users are encouraged to participate in the elections. Voting will conclude 23:59 (UTC) on 28 March 2010.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:24, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The March 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:20, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The review has not yet started. Anybody is can review the article and leave comments. You are on the right track leaving comments about what needs to be improved, I'd suggest expanding them with other things you mentioned on my talk page and being active in the discussion. When a Good Article Reviewer appears, he should review the discussion, and if he doesn't, and there are still unresolved issues, you should point them out to him. PS. Your articles have never qualified for Good Article because nobody has ever nominated them (usually it is the creator who does that, the instructions are at WP:GAC - let me know if they are not clear). Two of your articles (this and this) have passed MILHIST B-class review and could be good GA candidates. This article failed criterion one, you may want to ask the reviewer why (I don't see anything particularly wrong with the references). --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 18:19, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I notice that at WP:GAN, you have tagged this article as being on hold. Yet at Talk:Second Northern War the review has not started. Are you actually reviewing this? –– Jezhotwells (talk) 20:26, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reading the above comment, I see that you were just leaving comments, which is fine, so I will remove the on hold tag and someone will review the article shortly. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 20:27, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The April 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:04, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The May 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 17:22, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. You are cordially invited to help pick fourteen new coordinators from a pool of twenty candidates. This time round, the term has increased from six to twelve months so it is doubly important that you have your say! Please cast your vote here no later than 23:59 (UTC) on Tuesday, 28 September 2010.

With many thanks in advance for your participation from the coordinator team,  Roger Davies ^talk 21:21, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello
I notice you've edited this page a bit; I've made some tweaks. I realize this incident is a sore point; I hope the article as it stands explains things satisfactorily. Xyl 54 (talk) 00:04, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

PS: I put the ISBN note for Schofields book back in; it lets readers know there isn't one, rather than someone didn't bother to add it...Xyl 54 (talk)

Delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 21:16, 25 April 2011 (UTC) [reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Carthage and Australia in Palestine Op-ed: Remembering 9/11

Ciezko poprawiac bez zrodel, nawet nie jestem pewien jakie jest jego pelne imie... takich marnych artykulow jest wiele. Poprawiamy je powoli, jak wszystko na wiki :) --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me} 02:13, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews: Nick-D and Ian Rose look at Australian air power Op-ed: Buggie111 ruminates about WikiLife and WikiDeath

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D analyzes three books from Osprey Publishing Review essay: Nick-D reviews the new Bundeswehr Military History Museum

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors – MHotY coming; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at the Congolese Wars Review essay: Ian Rose goes to El Alamein Op-ed: DCI's call to revitalize WikiProject History

Nominations for the "Military Historian of the Year" for 2011 are now open. If you would like to nominate an editor for this award, please do so here. Voting will open on 22 January and run for seven days. Thanks! On behalf of the coordinators, Nick-D (talk) and Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 22:42, 15 January 2012 (UTC) You were sent this message because you are a listed as a member of the Military history WikiProject.[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D Nick-D looks into two recent Milhist books Review essay: Kirill Lokshin, the first coordinator Op-ed: Hchc's English Castles

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks into two recent Milhist books Op-ed: Ian Rose discusses article assessments

Takie rzeczy warto zglaszac na WT:POLAND. Pozdr, --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me} 15:30, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks into two recent Milhist books Op-ed: Hawkeye on Wikipedia collaborating with the AWM

I see you were a major contributor to this article. I am afraid currently it should be delisted as B-class (see rationale at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_history/Assessment/Requests#Requests_for_assessment], primary issue is insufficient referencing), but perhaps you'd like to make some edits to address those issues? --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me} 15:48, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Same for Battles of Medieval Poland, recently moved to a better title. It is really close to B, even GA class, if you could only add more refs. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me} 17:40, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Good job with the Warfare article. There are still a few citations missing, I'll go ahead and add req cite tags. When they are added, I'll support the article for B-class, and I'd recommend you go for a WP:GA status through WP:GAN. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me} 21:01, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent, I've upgraded Warfare in Medieval Poland to B-class. After you write a proper lead, I think you can nominate it at WP:GAN! --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me} 15:50, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Bomzibar on Subhas Chandra Bose; Hawkeye on corps commanders; Nick-D on American special forces Op-ed: The Land on commemorating World War I

Jesli mozesz: zapodaj na wikiprojekt, zlinkuj dyskusje na pl wiki, i zdefiniuj "cos zrobic". Pomysli sie :) --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me} 07:20, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think this article could be nominated for GA. See Talk:1er_régiment_de_chevau-légers_lanciers_polonais_de_la_Garde_impériale#GA.3F for the one "to do" thing. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me} 21:10, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Bomzibar on Chiang Kai-shek; Nick-D on the Falklands War Interview: Article writers discuss biographies Op-ed: Nick-D examines using news articles as sources

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D on the Chaco War and the Bougainville Campaign Op-ed: Remembering conflict

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors: Wikimania 2012; special projects note Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D on the Australian 25th Battalion Interview: Article writers discuss buildings and fortifications Op-ed: Hawkeye7 reports on a weekend workshop

See [[3]]. --Orestek (talk) 17:39, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D on the legacy of World War II Op-ed: Bomzibar on German military history

The Military history WikiProject has started its 2012 project coordinator election process, where we will select a team of coordinators to organize the project over the coming year. If you would like to be considered as a candidate, please submit your nomination by 14 September. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact one of the current coordinators on their talk page. This message was delivered here because you are a member of the Military history WikiProject. – Military history coordinators (about the project • what coordinators do) 08:40, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: AustralianRupert on artillery in South Australia, and Nick-D on Venice's empire Op-ed: Nick-D on the "Kokoda: Beyond the Legend" conference

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; milestone for the Fortifications task force; contest results Articles: The month's new Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/News/October 2012/Hawkeye7 on mission command Op-ed: The ed17 on how The Bugle could be improved

I had contemplated planning a WP:WLL event at the Pritzker Military Library on Saturday November 10 (the day before Veteran's Day). To my surprise, WP:MILHIST has no interest in such an event and WP:CHICAGO has shown apathy to WP:WLL events in the past. Mareklug (talk · contribs) and Pharos (talk · contribs) have suggested that you might be interested in such an event. I am not sure what topic would be good, but if we are going to do this event I need you and Mareklug (talk · contribs) to support it. Are you interested?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 06:18, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please sign up at Wikipedia:Meetup/Chicago/Wikipedia Loves Libraries 2012.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 15:13, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: The month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Sturmvogel_66, AustralianRupert, and Nick-D look at ships, soldiers, and railways Op-ed: Nick-D on navigating the FA and A-Class review processes

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: The month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Simon Harley on British battleships and Nick-D on the French Resistance Interview: Five editors discuss some less-represented areas of military history Op-ed: Ian Rose looks back on 2012

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: The month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Mongol naval power Op-ed: Crisco 1492 on war films

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at US Army leadership since World War II

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at refugees during the Battle of France Interview: Editors discuss writing articles about the former Yugoslavia Op-ed: Prioryman on German V-weapon sites and the historian's responsibility

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Sturmvogel 66 and Hawkeye7 look at aspects of the Pacific War Op-ed: ErrantX considers the rabbit hole of research

Hello, to resolve an ongoing neutrality dispute on the Blue Army (Poland) page, I'm requesting any assistance possible from experienced Wikipedia editors to look at the 'Controversies' section of the Blue Army page, and review the text for possible bias. I'm not an seasoned Wikipedia contributor myself, in fact I don't really edit much at all. But, when I came across the Blue Army page, I was taken aback by the blunt and inaccurate way in which the subject matter was portrayed! The list of possible neutrality violations is extensive, and due to my novice editor status all my past attempts to modify the text have been dismissed as being disruptive, and subsequently reversed:

Possible neutrality issues found on the Blue Army (Poland) 'Controversies' section: Neutrality Tag is constantly being taken down without reaching a final consensus on the subject matter. Weasel word are used to create an overall exaggerated impression of the events in question, and others are used to cast doubt on anything reported by the Polish side as being legitimate. POV and the use of questionable secondary source references, which contradict primary source accounts of the events. In this case the investigation conducted by the United States envoy to Poland Hugh S. Gibson and his subsequent State Department report on the issue. The American envoy found that: many of the newspaper reports alleging antisemitism were planted by the German and Soviet governments, and had been inflated or even based on hearsay and confabulation. Also, the envoy reported that many of the "pogroms" were in fact food riots, where an even larger number of Christian shops were ransacked. Undue Weight specific events are taken out of context, such as: abuse of civilians during the military campaign by the Blue Army troops is automatically labeled as antisemitic. Thus, taken out of context, when in fact looting was not only restricted to jewish households.

In the end, I understand that this is a difficult subject matter, and that some of the troops did engage in open antisemitism. But, by breaking the above listed neutrality rules, the editor (Faustian) who wrote much of the section, is creating a false picture of the Blue Army, in which the reader comes away with the bias impression that "Pogroming" is the only thing the Blue Army did.

Again, for a quick snapshot of the primary source's account of the events, please see the United States envoy Hugh S. Gibson Wikipedia page. And, thank you for any assistance in this matter. --68.191.79.36 (talk) 22:17, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Dumelow on the French Foreign Legion and Nick-D on New Zealand military history Op-ed: Nick-D on military history tourism

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Works on the RNZAF, World War I in the Baltic, and British battleship construction Op-ed: Anchors Aweigh for the Majestic Titans

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Australia's frontier wars Interview: What Wikimedia chapters can offer military history editors

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at the death of Osama bin Laden Op-ed: Sturmvogel_66 presents his secrets of prolific contribution

Szanowny Belissariusie,

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Meetup/Chicago_8

Otóż dowiedziałem się właśnie przed chwilą prywatnie od użytkownika Pharaosa, że niebawem, 26 października, odbędzie się spotkanie amatorów historii wojskowej i militariów w bibliotece Pritzker, w dzielnicy Loop. Sam nie wiem czy się stawię, ale ośmioro amerykańskich wikipedystów (nie znam pośród nich nikogo), w tym użytkownik Kirill podróżujący w tym celu z Dystryktu Kolumbii, już się zapisali. Wiem, jak bardzo Cię interesuje historia wojska polskiego, toteż pozwalam sobie na tę notkę. Serdecznie pozdrawiam, --Mareklug ^talk 05:36, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Kirill ^[talk] 18:01, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at the American Civil War

You have declared "User en-5" in Polish Wiki and en-4 here. Was it intentional? Double standard? How about en-5 here? Would it sound too serious? ;-) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.193.225.174 (talk) 23:43, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks Austro-Hungarian battleships of World War I Op-ed: Advice on reviewing Featured and A-Class articles

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Hawkeye7 looks at US industry in World War II Op-ed: AustralianRupert offers a soldier's perspective on editing Wikipedia

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Carcharoth and Hawkeye7 look at World War I cemeteries and the British Army in World War II Interview: Less-represented areas of military history – part 2 Op-ed: TomStar81 and Nick-D look back on 2013 and ahead to 2014

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D, Zawed and Hawkeye7 look at recent releases

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kaszanka, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hungarian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Rabaul in World War II and Australia in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Hawkeye7 on military command and Nick-D on F-111s in combat

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Hawkeye7 looks at Britain's War Machine Interview: Article writers discuss German military history

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at The Lost Boys of Anzac Op-ed: Peacemaker67 on Featured Articles involving Yugoslavia in World War II

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at life aboard a US aircraft carrier and Hawkeye7 considers the role of food in World War II

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Jonas Vinther and Nick-D look at examples of electronic media Op-ed: TomStar81 on the shot heard around the world

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Wrap-up of some recent external reviews Interview: World War I editors Op-ed: TomStar81 on the outbreak of World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Hawkeye7 looks at the military history of Austria-Hungary Timeleine: This month in World War I

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 22:15, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review: Nick-D on Britain in the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D on Britain in the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Nazi Germany's Eastern Front allies Op-ed: TomStar81 on the origins and legacy of trench warfare Timeline: This month in World War I

The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Hawkeye7 on armoured reconnaissance and German scientists, Nick-D on time travelling historians Op-ed: TomStar81 looks at the World War I Christmas truce Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Jonas Vinther on Hitler and Cliftonian on the Rhodesia Regiment Interview: 2014 Military History Newcomer Award nominees Review essay: Nick-D on the Australian War Memorial Op-ed: TomStar81 on the birth of strategic bombing Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review: Nick-D on the British Pacific Fleet Op-ed: TomStar81 looks at the advent of chemical warfare Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review: Recent external reviews Review essay: Nick-D on the Australian Fleet Air Arm Museum Op-ed: TomStar81 on submarine warfare in World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

Szanowny Panie Piotrze,

Jestem Panu wdzięczny za odpowiedź wyrażającą chęć pomocy wikipedystycznej ambitnemu narwańcowi co sobie "chapnął" tłumaczenie z Polskich tekstów mnie bliżej nieznanych artykułu Wikipedii angielskiej o pałacu w Otwocku.. Właśnie śpieszę donieść Panu osobiście, że ciut poprawiłem po nim: Palace in Otwock Wielki.

Ale ja do Pana piszę w raczej w zupełnie innej sprawie: otóż ktoś trzeci zorganizował aż dwa spotania wikipediowe w miesiącu kwietniu w naszym Chicago, w tym kolejne w Bibliotece Militariów i Muzeum Pritzker.

Pozwalam sobie przytoczyć verbatim ogłoszenie skierowane ku mojej stronie użytkownika na angielskiej Wikipedii,które zakładam z rzutu okiem na stronę, niestety Pana ominęło. Zobowiązałem się samemu zawitać na oba spotkania. Mam nadzieję, że Pan będzie w stanie dołączyć do grona.

Łączę wyrazy szczególnego szacunku dla Pana oraz Pańskiego wkładu w rozwój naszych obu Wikipedii,

Cordialement,

Marek Wojciech Ługowski (Lugowski)
Mareklug ^talk 09:51, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Chicago/Edgewater

== Two Chicago edit-a-thons this April! ==

Hey folks! We've got two exciting edit-a-thons happening in Chicago during the third week of April:

• Regenstein Library at the University of Chicago edit-a-thon on Wednesday, April 15th from 4 PM - 8 PM
• Pritzker Military Museum & Library edit-a-thon on Saturday, April 18th from 10 AM - 3:30 PM

If you're interested in meeting up and working together with other Wikipedians at these fantastic institutions, please RSVP at the event pages linked above. If you know someone else interested in learning about or editing Wikipedia, invite them! We will provide training and resources for new editors at both events. For questions about the events, please refer to the event pages or contact I JethroBT (talk · contribs). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:16, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

(Opt-out Instructions) This message was sent by I JethroBT through MediaWiki message delivery (talk)

I signed up for both --Mareklug ^talk 09:51, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Dzięki za powiadomienie i ciepłe słowa...

No, to wspaniale. Ja się zapisałem do stałej pomocy u Pritzkera, a ponieważ my będziemy w styczności, to i Pan będzie au courant w temacie co tam się wykluwa wikipedystycznie. A poza tym służę własnym pojazdem, jak tylko zrobię modicum porządku we wnętrzu. ;) Zo rychłego zobaczenia. Pozdrawiam cieplutko w środku nocy. -̴Mareklug ^talk 05:43, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at the landing at Anzac Cove Op-ed: TomStar81 on the debut of poison gas in World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review: Recent external reviews Op-ed: TomStar81 and Simon Harley on the sinking of the Lusitania Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review: Recent external reviews Op-ed: TomStar81 on the new technology of World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review: Recent external reviews Review essay: Nick-D on sourcing articles about bombing a battleship Op-ed: TomStar81 on the role of nursing in World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D on the Second Schleswig War Interview: Featured picture participants Op-ed: TomStar81 on Indian nationalism during World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors, coordinator elections have begun Articles: Abbasids to a Yugoslav monitor Book reviews: Economics of warfare, Japan, and light horse Op-ed: We can (not) advance Timeline: This month in World War I

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 29 September. Yours, Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 05:21, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review: Anotherclown and Sturmvogel 66 on war in the air and at sea Review essay: Auntieruth55 on the French Revolutionary Wars Op-ed: TomStar81 on the entry of Bulgaria in World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

The user page interwiki link connects solely to the user page (pl:Wikipedysta:Belissarius) in Polish Wikipedia, but the Polish Wiki's user page connects to the user page in English Wikipedia as well as to the user page (la:Usor:Belissarius) in Latin Wikipedia (created by Belissarius in August 2009). The Latin Wikipedia user page also connects to the user page in both English Wikipedia and Polish Wikipedia. Apparently, some technical issue is preventing the interlink from Latin Wikipedia's user page from appearing in English Wikipedia and, hopefully, it can be resolved. —Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 17:00, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is with great sadness that I bring (a bit late) news that User:Belissarius, an active editor on pl and en wikis and a member of this project, has passed away few days ago. He was a notable Wikipedian, too: Piotr Domaradzki. RIP. Anyone wishing to send his condolences or such is welcome to do so at pl:Wikipedysta:Belissarius/(Ostatnie) podziękowania. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 01:18, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

He has helped out by writing some Polish articles on American subjects, and he encouraged me to get pictures for the Hamtramck Public Schools article (Hamtramck is a city in Michigan, next to Detroit, that was historically Polish). In am very grateful he translated the article to pl:Szkoły publiczne w Hamtramck WhisperToMe (talk) 03:13, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]