I was 81.187.192.168 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) until this morning. 81.2.123.64 (talk) 09:31, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

''Flux55'' (talk) 17:33, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For reverting that LTA on MTV 80s. I can't thank IP editors due to technical mediawiki restrictions, so I decided to give you a cookie instead :) ~Δ (delta • t • c) 18:46, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Surprising! An IP reverted vandalism. Linked article: List of Nigerian billionaires by net worth 48JCL (talk) 22:05, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For your amazing work against vandalism.

— Alien333 (what I did & why I did it wrong) 16:12, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For your anti-vandalism work! Any reason why you haven't made an account yet?

GoldRomean (talk) 16:28, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	For all your revs :) The Herald (Benison) (talk) 10:04, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to second this. Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 13:27, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Parksfan1955 (talk) 09:00, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I greatly appreciate your constructive edits on Wikipedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

• Introductory tutorial
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• The Teahouse

You are welcome to continue editing without logging in. If you like, you can create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits, such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (81.2.123.64) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on , or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page.

Again, welcome! ModdiWX (You Got Mail!) 13:59, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

im a little late! sorry lol :) ModdiWX (You Got Mail!) 13:59, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for lending your time to help improve Derek Carr! If you are interested in continuing to edit, I suggest you make an account to gain a bunch of privileges. Happy editing! Red Director (talk) 17:45, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No thank you! 81.2.123.64 (talk) 17:46, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! IP editors help keep the world turning around here in a great way. Red Director (talk) 17:50, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Luhanopi. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent additions to the page Tambogrande was removed because it appeared to be in a language other than English. We can only accept English-language text on this version of Wikipedia; if you would like to contribute to a Wikipedia in another language, please visit the List of Wikipedias and see if a version of Wikipedia exists in your desired language. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Luhanopi (talk) 17:49, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Check again, then come back here and apologise please. 81.2.123.64 (talk) 17:50, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn without apology here. 81.2.123.64 (talk) 17:52, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

	The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
	It's great to see a constructive IP protecting Wikipedia from vandalism. Thank you for your work! TheWikiToby (talk) 15:58, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits could be confused with vandalism; if I were you, I would create an account. --Luhanopi (talk) 14:25, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not by anybody paying attention. 81.2.123.64 (talk) 14:26, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but reverting a vandalism-reverting edit is a mess :) Luhanopi (talk) 14:29, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If someone reverts one vandalism edit but not the vandal edit before, of course their revert is going to get reverted as part of removing the older piece of vandalism. If people wish to avoid this, actually checking the article for more vandalism rather than just scoring Internet Points™ by being FIRST! to remove the latest would be the way to go. Slightly slower leads to better quality. 81.2.123.64 (talk) 14:40, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You've done a great job with the school vandals ip 81. Thank you so much for your work. Knitsey (talk) 14:49, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I mean reverting an edit which reverts vandalism thinking that the edit reverting vandalism is vandalism Luhanopi (talk) 16:09, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• A vandalizes a page
• B reverts vandalism
• C reverts B's edit because for C B appears to be vandalism

Luhanopi (talk) 16:10, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you cannot tell the difference between a bad edit and an edit that's a revert, you need to slow down. Committed IP editors like this help keep us accountable. Too many good IP edits are reverted, and most editors without an account are not going to know how to rectify that. ⇌ Jake Wartenberg 16:14, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Some editors will still do it by mistake. I once self-reverted such edit quickly Luhanopi (talk) 16:23, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	For helping out with the school articles and the vandalism! thanks, 81! Babysharkboss2!! (Slap me with the fish. I dare you.) 14:54, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Great to see a constructive IP editor here! ‹hamster717🐉› (discuss anything!🐹✈️ • my contribs🌌🌠) 15:12, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Great work on Ahmed Al-Kaf. Troutfarm27 (Talk) 18:47, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you – and likewise: you were doing great in that mess! 81.2.123.64 (talk) 18:48, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

IFRS 17

You're doing a great job, thank you. Knitsey (talk) 19:13, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Sir Nuttingham. I noticed that you recently removed content from Evil eye without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Sir Nuttingham (talk) 12:05, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

False warning removed without apology here. Golf clap. 81.2.123.64 (talk) 21:45, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Someone who's wrong on the internet. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Hatchet (novel) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 21:40, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

False warning removed without apology here. Golf clap. 81.2.123.64 (talk) 21:43, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I've noticed that you are presently going through and purging the encyclopedia of the phrase "under his belt". While cliches and idioms should often be avoided in favor of direct language, please be sure to insert direct language in the place of the cliche when doing this. Just chopping the phrase out can make sentences be a bit hard-to-read at times.

— Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 20:54, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am – other edits show that I'm changing the syntax when required. I felt that the sentence in C'est la Guerre read well enough without it. Your mileage has varied. *shrug* 81.2.123.64 (talk) 20:56, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your report at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard#Legal services in the United Kingdom I told you that the editor had been warned. You may like to know that he continued with promotional editing, so I have blocked the account. JBW (talk) 00:10, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Looked like that was going to be the end result, alas. Thanks very much for keeping an eye on this. 81.2.123.64 (talk) 11:19, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for lending your time to help improve Premiership of Keir Starmer! If you are interested in continuing to edit, I suggest you make an account to gain a bunch of privileges. Happy editing! Baqi:) (talk) 14:01, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No thank you. 81.2.123.64 (talk) 14:01, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Discospinster. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Quinn Hughes—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. ... discospinster _talk 20:13, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

False warning removed without apology here. 81.2.123.64 (talk) 20:15, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

	The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
	It's true that you don't get a vote at RfA, but it's always so nice to see support from IP editors who've interacted with the candidate. Cheers. -- asilvering (talk) 20:09, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

+1 on that. KylieTastic (talk) 10:53, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

... for reverting the hijacking of Zero D by a spammer. JBW (talk) 21:58, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There are no resources to it, I added the traits of a "fresa" in Mexico. As a Mexican myself I notices the previous definition focused it on an economic and education definition, which is based in examples from soap operas that are mocking the traits, I clarify the traits ARE what makes a person to be CONSIDERED a "fresa". Traits and can be from any social status. JoyLaur (talk) 15:59, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

One of our most important policies here is that we don't print anything unless it has a reliable source. We can't accept an edit that adds your personal experience. We need you to include a citation to someone else saying what you want to say. You can have a look at referencing for beginners for more information. 81.2.123.64 (talk) 13:50, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template index/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. Fishy-Finns (talk) 19:35, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I already hit them with uw-vand4im on the first IP they were on, which they have seen, and then reported them to AIV. There is no point repeatedly templating them as they jump IPs. 81.2.123.64 (talk) 19:37, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, my bad. I was watching WP:AIV and RC but I didn't see that you mentioned they jumped IPs. I see now that you warned the original IP and then reported, which I didn't first look at. Sorry again :) Fishy-Finns (talk) 19:41, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nemanja Nedovic's nickname is indeed "Him". You can check that online, it's not official by some staff but it's public nickname, Im from Serbia and I confirm that. RedStarEditor (talk) 16:41, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't doubt you, but we need a reliable source to tell us that, not just you. 81.2.123.64 (talk) 16:56, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Should I upload you screenshots or what? I mean what do you mean as reliable source, beacuse no news speak about it but yes most fans. RedStarEditor (talk) 19:54, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

We need a link to a reliable source. If there isn’t one — if, for instance, there’s a nickname that everybody uses but nobody has ever mentioned it in a newspaper for some reason — then it cannot be added to our encyclopaedia. Sorry about that. 81.2.123.64 (talk) 00:22, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

hi,

are good economic opportunity because it is open near the sea or Ocean which gives it a beautiful view which is can promote tourism and increase the economy you can refer to in Israel and USA. Sks.gun (talk) 17:02, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is a possibility that the English-language Wikipedia is not the best place for you. We require editors here to have at least a basic grasp of English, which seems not to be present in your writing. Why not have a look at the List of Wikipedias and pick the one for your native language? They'd love you to help out! 81.2.123.64 (talk) 17:05, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	happy editing, you’re cool. brachy08 (chat here lol) 05:01, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thanks for everything you do as a wikipedian, thanks for being awesome for reverting nonconstructive edits! ModdiWX (You Got Mail!) 19:31, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Both in reverting and in your messages at user talk:BOvejawdfjdslafj you did close to what I was planning to do, but you got there first. Use of Grammarly is really so unhelpful. I suppose it may be helpful for someone with a very poor ability to write English, enabling them to at least somewhat reduce their error rate, but in the hands of someone with a low level of competence trying to "correct" something written and edited by more competent writers, it can be lethal. JBW (talk) 20:18, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Grammarly makes me shudder. You can always spot when an email (or, worse, a Wikipedia article!) has been run through it: the language becomes stilted and more specialised terms get bowdlerised. Painful! Thanks for rescuing what was useful in the changes. 81.2.123.64 (talk) 20:22, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In a recent edit to the article Laurence Westgaph you wrote "Under the Article 17 of GDPR, Westgaph has the legal right to have his personal information about spent convictions removed from online search results and directories as they are spent and over 16 and 25 year old". I am not a lawyer, nor am I acquainted with every detail of the General Data Protection Regulation, but the following comments may be relevant. The General Data Protection Regulation has force in a large number of European countries, but the Wikimedia Foundation's servers are in the United States. A Wikipedia article is certainly not "online search results", and I doubt that is regarded as a directory for the relevant purposes. In any case, statements about what you think should or shouldn't be in an article belong in talk pages and other discussion pages, not in the article itself. JBW (talk) 00:10, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page watcher) @JBW Unless I'm missing something, I'm pretty sure that 81 removed that line. It was added by another editor in Special:Diff/1275042841. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 00:26, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm really sorry. GreenLipstickLesbian is right. I somehow misread the editing history. I was actually rather surprised, because from my experience of your editing history I thought that was out of character for you. JBW (talk) 00:32, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. I actually brought up the issue of that editor’s weird GDPR disclaimer on the BLP noticeboard, precisely because it doesn’t apply to Wikipedia. 81.2.123.64 (talk) 01:09, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, my apology for the erroneous revert and warning! Cheers Adakiko (talk) 02:37, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]