Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Cbl62 (talk · contribs) 23:03, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: TonyTheTiger (talk · contribs) I'll review this one. 23:14, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• How would you feel about including that he had hits in his first two major league plate appearances per this box score play-by-play-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 16:45, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• The same play by play shows an RBI in his third inning double which was against the Bosox (not the Orioles)-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 16:45, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Maybe his first home run was against the Orioles, his first run, RBI, hit, extra-base hit and stolen base all came in the first game against the BoSox.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 16:48, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• When Whitaker was not at 2nd, where did he play in 78?-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 16:53, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Do we know who started at 2nd in the 1983 ASG?-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 17:08, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• You don't mention his 5th ASG. You never mention if he started any ASGs.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 17:10, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• The word now (Kinsler) has an obsolescence. Maybe you could use the {{asof}} template to prompt for vigilance.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 17:12, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Can you provide any more color on the over the roof shot?-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 17:19, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• I forget what a position player is (excluding DHs? pitchers?)-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 17:21, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• I am a bit surprised to see 2 whole paragraphs without any citations. Also, the legacy section has a paragraph with a lot of uncited facts at the end.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 17:27, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• I am also a bit surprised that Sparky Anderson's name does not appear in the article.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 17:30, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks for the review, Tony. I will work on these issues. Cbl62 (talk) 18:24, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

• N.B. the copyvio detector has a lot of high numbers.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 22:27, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Cbl62, @TonyTheTiger, what is the status of this review? If it is not going to be completed I recommend it be closed one way or the other. —Ganesha811 (talk) 00:50, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I will do it. Cbl62 (talk) 03:56, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@TonyTheTiger, as it has been a week with no activity, I recommend closure. —Ganesha811 (talk) 15:53, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If there is no activity on the article over this long weekend, I will close.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 16:10, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]