Article milestones Date Process Result July 15, 2008 Articles for deletion No consensus July 28, 2008 Articles for deletion Kept October 8, 2008 Articles for deletion Speedily kept August 11, 2009 Articles for deletion Kept May 7, 2023 Articles for deletion Kept

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Popular culture (inactive) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Popular culture, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Popular cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Popular cultureTemplate:WikiProject Popular culturePopular culture Pop music Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Regional and national music Low‑importance Honorific nicknames in popular music is within the scope of the WikiProject Regional and national music, an attempt at building a resource on the music of all the peoples and places of the world. Please visit the project's listing to see the article's assessment and to help us improve the article as we push to 1.0.Regional and national musicWikipedia:WikiProject Regional and national musicTemplate:WikiProject Regional and national musicRegional and national music Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Latin music Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Latin music (music performed in Spanish, Portuguese and the languages of Ibero-America, see project scope for more details) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latin musicWikipedia:WikiProject Latin musicTemplate:WikiProject Latin musicLatin music Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Rock music Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. R&B and Soul Music Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Roots music Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Roots music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to roots, folk and traditional folk music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Roots musicWikipedia:WikiProject Roots musicTemplate:WikiProject Roots musicRoots music Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Country music Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Country music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to country music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Country musicWikipedia:WikiProject Country musicTemplate:WikiProject Country musicCountry music Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Hip-hop Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip-hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip-hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip-hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip-hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip-hopHip-hop Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

J.avanzado (talk) 19:24, 30 October 2024 (UTC) Kindly add the sobriquet "Monster Monster" to w:Lady Gaga, I believe this title befits an honorific description as it is supported by following sources:[reply]

• "The Performance Identities of Lady Gaga: Critical Essays" by Richard J. Gray II discusses the origin of the title Mother Monster on page 125
• An article on Billboard calling her as such, citing her performance on the Opening Ceremony of 2024 Paris Olympics
• Her profile on Grammys website

... and numerous other sources -J.avanzado (talk) 09:44, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This still does not meet requirement 3: mother "monster" is a nickname, not a honorific nickname. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 17:40, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There's at least one article that explicitly states "Mother Monster" as an honorific title for Gaga. Also in the book The Oxford Handbook of the Bible and American Popular Culture by Dan W. Clanton Jr et. al., the authors used the phrasing "referred to as Mother Monster" which is contextually similar to the usage of the terms "widely", "dubbed" or "often called" which is one of the requirements for inclusion of such title. As a point of contention it would be wise to discuss why you believe the title "Mother Monster" is just a nickname and not an honorific title bestowed to her by media and her fans. -J.avanzado (talk) 04:33, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Mother Monster" doesn’t carry the same honorific weight as titles like "Queen of Pop", which Gaga is already listed for in this article. To be honest, even her Wikipedia article writes Gaga's fans call her "Mother Monster", and she often refers to them as "Little Monsters", which tells me that this nickname isn't used much outside her fandom. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 22:01, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If that's the case, then shouldn't it be too for "Father, Son and the Holy Ghost", "Vocal Trinity", "Asia's Songbird", "The Boss", "The Stupendous One", "The Chairman of the Board", "The Artist", "The Sun of Mexico", "Mama Africa" (this one even resembling Mother Monster), etc which were all listed in this wiki page? In my view honorifics shouldn't be boxed in titles that has "Queen/King of something" in them and that Mother Monster by definition fits the categories of an honorific title separate from her Queen of Pop title which has been contested by other people most notably by fans of Madonna, as does all these titles I listed and all the cases of such titles throughout history which most of the time started as sobriquets attached to them by other people like historians, journalists or fanatics. —J.avanzado (talk) 04:28, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If I may add, "Queen Bey" which is a nickname given to Beyoncé by her fans was permitted to be added here as one of her honorific titles. In that light, shouldn't it be fair for Mother Monster to be added to Lady Gaga's as her honorific title too, since it carries the same prestige as that of Beyoncé which is the point of contention here? —Haley.Parrot (talk) 12:17, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

* You really need to discuss this and allow the discussion to develop. Before starting the process see WP:RFCBEFORE RfCs are time consuming, and editor time is valuable. Editors should try to resolve their issues before starting an RfC. Try discussing the matter with any other parties on the related talk page. If you can reach a consensus or have your questions answered through discussion, then there is no need to start an RfC.Lukewarmbeer (talk) 17:39, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The problem was that the respondent stopped responding, that's why I started an RfC to get the opinion of other editors regarding this dispute. –J.avanzado (talk) 08:10, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies for not responding, but I have to stand by what I said earlier. I don't think this nickname is honorific enough for the purposes of this article. All of the other nicknames you mentioned is in fact honorific in the context of their native country/region, industry, and the likes. If other editors have opinions on this, then please feel free to chime in. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 20:52, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Add Anita Baker as the “Queen of Quiet Storm” 2600:6C50:417F:8D01:C1A1:65A7:C9C5:FC1 (talk) 10:08, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn’t she be listed under A.B as “The Queen of Tejano”. I saw that Laura Canales already has it but many of the titles have been given to one person. Selena is commonly referred to as “The Queen of Tejano”, so it’d make sense to have her listed. 2600:1003:B119:BADD:19A:54F1:C6BD:B4FB (talk) 22:11, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Amália Rodrigues should be added and listed as "Queen of Fado".

Sources: Amália Rodrigues Duarte Viz (talk) 01:19, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]