This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

California: Southern California This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Southern California task force. National Register of Historic Places High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Architecture High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. World Heritage Sites Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject World Heritage Sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of World Heritage Sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.World Heritage SitesWikipedia:WikiProject World Heritage SitesTemplate:WikiProject World Heritage SitesWorld Heritage Sites Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Historic sites Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

In short, no. See my comments at Talk:Barnsdall Art Park#Merging Holyhock house with Barnsdall Art Park dm (talk) 19:18, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, it's notable in its own right. Mfield (talk) 15:07, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's been a week with no additional comments, so I'm removing this... dm (talk) 18:28, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The history section contradicts itself, saying both that the house is currently open and closed. Fixing properly would require knowing when the open period including the 2005 date mentioned, actually began. I don't, so I'm leaving it to someone who does. HuwG 203.208.123.81 (talk) 07:44, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Making some changes here, looks like the house both opened and closed in 2005. Alladode (talk) 22:09, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hollyhock House. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100609160708/http://www.preservation.lacity.org/monuments to http://www.preservation.lacity.org/monuments/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:22, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hollyhock House. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071114222420/http://tps.cr.nps.gov/nhl/detail.cfm?ResourceId=853494857&ResourceType=Building to http://tps.cr.nps.gov/nhl/detail.cfm?ResourceId=853494857&ResourceType=Building

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:39, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Exterior of Hollyhock House

• ... that Los Angeles's Hollyhock House was built for someone who lived there for only one year? Source: Kaplan, Sam Hall (February 6, 1988). "Wright Stuff-In and Out of the Gallery". Los Angeles Times. p. 4.
  • ALT1: ... that Frank Lloyd Wright once sent sheriffs to repossess two Japanese screens at Los Angeles's Hollyhock House? Source: Hoffmann, Donald (2011). Frank Lloyd Wright's Hollyhock House: The Illustrated Story of an Architectural Masterpiece. Dover Publications. p. 100.
  • ALT2: ... that a Los Angeles resident once filed a lawsuit claiming that a fundraiser at Hollyhock House violated the U.S. Constitution? Source: Oliver, Myrna (July 30, 1974). "Snyder Sued Over Use of House in Park". Los Angeles Times. p. D5
  • ALT3: ... that Hollyhock House's living room has a moat? Source: Smith, Gordon (July 15, 2005). "Wright". Daily Breeze. p. K22.
  • ALT4: ... that Hollyhock House was the first house in Los Angeles designed by Frank Lloyd Wright? Source: Rivera, Carla (May 30, 2000). "Popular Barnsdall Art Park Prepares to Close for Up to Year for Upgrade". Los Angeles Times. pp. B11, B16.
  • Reviewed: Church of St. Casimir (Saint Paul, Minnesota) (1 of 2 QPQs)
  • Comment: I can propose more hooks later if necessary.

Epicgenius (talk) 01:34, 20 January 2025 (UTC).[reply]

• New enough, long enough, no copyvio in article, hook is properly sourced (found the article using Wikipedia Library), image is properly licensed to my understanding of the copyright of it. I fixed a typo in the main hook. I think I lean towards preferring the main hook, although the other hooks are also interesting. I haven't verified the ALT1 or ALT4 hooks though. seefooddiet (talk) 03:39, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]