Talk:Hoax (song)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong

Taylor Swift Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taylor Swift, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Taylor Swift on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Taylor SwiftWikipedia:WikiProject Taylor SwiftTemplate:WikiProject Taylor SwiftTaylor Swift
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Women in Music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education assignment: The Free Internet

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 29 August 2023 and 14 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Peeyuh (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Peeyuh (talk) 15:29, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA review

Passed. λ NegativeMP1 19:22, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Hoax (song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Medxvo (talk · contribs) 21:35, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: NegativeMP1 (talk · contribs) 01:33, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'll take a look at this article shortly. λ NegativeMP1 01:33, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks so much! Medxvo (talk) 07:56, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Prose

Honestly, I didn't notice any prose issues. There was one bit of the lead that I felt flowed together a bit weirdly ("Commercially, the track reached the national charts of Australia, Canada, and the United States, receiving certifications in Australia, Brazil, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom."), but I've slightly adjusted that. Let me know what you think.

Images

There is only one media file in the article, and it's a song excerpt. It has a valid fair use rationale that complies with WP:SAMPLE. I believe it's good to go. It even has TimedText!

Sources

Source formatting looks great. Every source has a writer listed (unless inapplicable), and every website is wikilinked. Date formatting is consistent as well. I have no complaints here.
I spotchecked a few uses of 1, 2, 4, 21, and 24. All of them seemed fine except for what I stated below.
- Another mild thing I adjusted: Both references 1 and 2 were used in the article prose to verify the opening statement of Production and release. However, reference 1 did not mention that Swift and Dessner wrote Hoax, while 2 did. As a result, I moved the references a tad bit. Hopefully that's fine.

Final comments

This is a wonderfully written, nice little song article. I have no complaints except for what I decided to adjust myself. There's nothing here that would warrant preventing promotion / putting this on hold, so I'm going to go ahead and pass this. Good job. λ NegativeMP1 19:21, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Thanks a lot, NegativeMP1! I truly appreciate the review and the kind words. Thank you for the adjustments and constructive edits as well. I hope you're having a good day today! Medxvo (talk) 19:35, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]