Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: MaranoFan (talk · contribs) 18:02, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Locust member (talk · contribs) 16:01, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This article looks like it is in beautiful shape so I'll be taking this on :) Will try to get this done by the weekend. Locust member (talk) 16:01, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Well-written

• Even though not technically MOS, I would still highly advise getting rid of false titles. I have seen that even your featured work has false titles so I won't be too nitpicky, though it is grammatically incorrect.
• Wikilink tweets
• Doesn't "Some journalists"/"Some critics" fall under MOS:WEASEL? Correct me if I'm mistaken/misunderstanding
• Grace Robins-Somerville uses she/her pronouns per her LinkedIn; you use he/him pronouns in the article.
• Wikilink Neil McCormick

References

• Per earwig, copyvio unlikely of 16.7%. Looks great!
• Interview can be wikilinked in ref. 3
• Rob Sheffield can be wikilinked in ref. 24
• Neil McCormick can be wikilinked in ref. 38
• Sputnikmusic is a staff review. Y
• Other sources I observed as not being listed as WP:RSP or WP:A/S are either used in multiple other good articles, have an editorial staff, or are not making controversial claims. Article has reliable sources. Y
• Found no issues in my spot-check when reading through the article; all sources verify their accompanied text. Y
• No original research that I observed. Y

Broad

• Covers the major aspects of a standard song article and does not veer off topic. Y

NPOV

• Y

Stable

• No edit disputes within the past 14 days. Slight vandalism from an anonymous editor a few days ago but nothing that seems persistent. Y

Illustrated

• Images are correctly licensed and have ALT text. Y
• Sound sample is correctly licensed and relevant, complies with WP:SAMPLE. Y

Overall'

• Fantastic work here, MaranoFan! I will put this article  On hold until my (very few) comments are addressed.