This page contains material which is kept because the contents are considered humorous. They are not intended, nor should they be used, for any research or serious use.

Editors for deletion (EfD), originally created by R then recreated by LaraLove Jennavecia and then given to GlassCobra, is where Wikipedians discuss whether an editor should be deleted. Editors listed here are debated for up to ∞, after which the deletion process proceeds based on Wikipedia community consensus. The editor is then either kept, merged and/or redirected, transwikied, renamed/moved to another username, or deleted, deleted and salted, or deleted, salted and peppered (with a side of onion rings) per the deletion policy.^[Verify]

This page explains what you should consider before nominating, the steps for nominating single or multiple editors, and how to discuss an EfD. It also lists the editors currently under consideration and includes a 'hall of notoriety'.

• You must not be listed here.
• The editor must not be listed here.
• The editor must be established and active, as new users may not understand the seriousness of this process.
• You may not list more than one editor per week.

If you want to participate in this page, the following must be met:

• You must not be listed here.
• You must understand WP:CIVIL, WP:NPA, and WP:DRRC, acknowledge that those policies apply here, as everywhere else on Wikipedia, and that any violations could result in a block. Be funny, not a dick.
• Your participation here can not exceed 1% of your regular daily edits.^[Who?]
• You must agree to never revert to re-add any comment that has been removed by any administrator (or the nominated user) for any reason.

Criteria for editor deletion

If you get past the instruction creep and understand the deletion process, consult the Criteria for editor deletion and the instructions below on how to list editors for deletion. Any debates which violate the above will be removed. Do not nominate anyone unless you are reasonably sure they will accept the nomination. If you are nominating someone you do not know well, please avoid embarrassing yourself and ask them if they will accept the nomination before nominating them. Further, no editor may be nominated more than once.

Instructions

To list a candidate, put his or her name in a level three category below, and leave {{subst:User:GlassCobra/Editor for deletion/Talk Notice}} on the editor's talk page. When ever you feel like it, close the debate placing {{subst:User:GlassCobra/Editor for deletion/top}} at the top and {{subst:User:GlassCobra/Editor for deletion/bottom}} at the bottom.

Nominees

Any editor nominated who finds it amusing and wishes to participate may add {{subst:User:GlassCobra/Editor for deletion/Nom}} to their userpage. Do not place this template on the userpage of another editor, even if you nominated them — they can do it themselves, if they so desire. Any editor who does not wish to participate may remove their nomination from this page at any time and list themselves on the opt out list.

Hall of Notoriety
Previous Discussions

Non-notable user. Self-nom. Suggest WP:CSD. Kayau Voting IS evil 02:42, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

• Keep. 52,000 Google hits prove notability without a shadow of doubt, and show that the nominator is on a deletionist crusade against themself. Also, the nomination statement is an egregious self attack worthy of a long block (pictured). Jafeluv (talk) 21:38, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
• Lego with a long block. Or maybe one of the thin bits that always get stuck on the other ones... GlassCobra 15:28, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

Recently passed in hell and with a remarkably calm approach. Refuses to reveal true identity, and thus I suspect this editor is actually a rogue adminbot. Suggest deletion and oversight of existence. Regards, --—Cyclonenim | Chat  17:47, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

I'm all about transparency, so oppose oversight. Not sure how I feel yet about deletion, will consider carefully. On a procedural note, shouldn't you have at least waited until I placed myself in Category:Wikipedia administrators open to deletion? --Floquenbeam (talk) 18:05, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Nope, you don't need either to be an admin or open to recall to be listed here. ϢereSpielChequers 22:46, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

Self nom. A non-notable radioisotope of an obscure element on the periodic table that doesn't have it's own article on Wikipedia and only has 13,600 Google hits anyway. Delete. ²³¹₉₁Pa (chat me!) 08:32, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Supah delete! Nobody cares about science. — The Earwig @ 16:31, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

• According to a well known encyclopaedia "Due to its scarcity, high radioactivity, and high toxicity, there are currently no uses for protactinium outside of scientific research." So I'm not sure whether to conserve this editor due to scarcity or delete due to toxicity. However it is superconductive below 1.4k - so I suggest freeze in liquid Helium and use to make servers based on superconductor technology. ϢereSpielChequers 20:47, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Delete. Will die in about 32760 years anyway, so kill him earlier and it won't make any difference. ²³¹₉₁Pa (chat me!) 08:32, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Not fair. I only have a few hours to live. ²³⁴₉₁Pa (chat me!) 08:32, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Ban him for wasting server resources and impersonating User:Wikipedia. WIKIPEDIA, the free encyclopedia.

You faked the time. The time is now...²³¹₉₁Pa (chat me!) 06:21, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

You're wrong, the time is 06:35 ²³¹₉₁Pa (chat me!) 06:35, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

No spoofing the MediaWiki interface. ²³¹₉₁Pa (chat me!) 06:21, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Wow! That's amazing...time travel into the past! ²³¹₉₁Pa (chat me!) 27 January 1756 (UTC)

Shut the fuck up. ²³¹₉₁Pa (chat me!) 06:24, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

ARGH! No interwikis to Uncyclopedia. This is a clear violation of free speech. I WILL SUE YOU IN A COURT OF LAW IN TRENTON, NEW JERSEY. ²³¹₉₁Pa (chat me!) 06:24, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Block as per Wikipedia:No legal threats. ²³¹₉₁Pa (chat me!) 06:24, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Hello, world! You smell funny! ²³¹₉₁Pa (chat me!) 06:24, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Oh my god! You insulted Jimbo! ²³¹₉₁Pa (chat me!) 06:24, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Rename to Unobtanium then declare a lost cause. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 14:55, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Rename to macguffinite; using "unobtanium" on the big screen is just bad. --A More Perfect Onion (talk) 15:36, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

• Ban per Wikipedia:No self attacks. bahamut0013^words_deeds 20:54, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
• Speedy delete 4 is an unlucky number meaning "death" in Chinese the language of our future overlords. Don't give them ideas. Hekerui (talk) 17:18, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Admin has come to my user page and :O OMG stolen mah commas[1], forcing me to protect them[2]. This is unacceptable behavior, and shows that he is probably a sock of Jimbo Wales. Therefore he must be deleted at once! --Coffee // have a cup // ark // 02:32, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

• Strong Remove from Jimbo's Underpants as nom --Coffee // have a cup // ark // 02:32, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
• Uber strong keep - If he's deleted I'll have to edit Bill Buchanan all by mahself ^_^ Steven Zhang ^{The clock is ticking....} 02:39, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
• Punish Steal his commas for punishment.--Giants27(c|s) 02:46, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
• Get the fuck out of my underpants - Oh shit I've been found out... *runs*... --Jimbo Wales // get in my pants // adopt a wale // 02:47, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
• Delete from Jimbo's underpants? - this could go in so many dark directions. Somebody save me! ... mah "boys" need room to breathe! — Ched :  ?  03:01, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

  You pervert! you have "boys" in Jimbo's Underpants????? Speedy Delete Ched Davis!!!! </witch hunt> --Coffee // have a cup // ark // 03:10, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

• Delete for keeping young boys prisoner in Jimbo's underpants. That's just sick man. — Huntster (t @ c) 09:00, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

• NOOO .. not "boys" as in "young men" ... muh nads, stones, nuts, twins, as in brass balls. .. sigh .. I have gots to start choosing my words better. Oh forget it, I'm sunk - Coffee - I'll get you for this!  ;~| — Ched :  ?  22:12, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

• Reluctant delete per sock User has by and large been a useful and thoughtful editor, so this particular sockpuppetry allegation is a bit of a surprise. But we can't have one person with two accounts having admin status, so plz chz wch act gets to keep the bit. ϢereSpielChequers 09:13, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

• there must be an error ... good socks don't make mistakes. — Jimbo :  ?  — Ched :  ?  22:16, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

• Delete Although not as a sock of Jimbo. Ched is clearly a sock of Roger Davies (talk · contribs), he just misspelled the name to deceive us! SoWhy 22:22, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
• Delete Per JarlaxleArtemis. XD Pmlineditor ∞ 11:05, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
• Delete far too polite for his own good, which raises the bar for everyone else.--kelapstick (talk) 19:48, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
• Delete agree with kelapstick too much politness in one person can't nbe good.--Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 21:03, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
• Distract with shiny object and steal commas back. GlassCobra 19:10, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete Copyvio of User:Pedro, and a sock of Jimbo. December21st2012Freak ^chat 21:49, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
• Whack with a fish, then we can all enjoy a tuna roll. bahamut0013^words_deeds 19:55, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
  • I recommend eating a sausage roll instead. --A More Perfect Onion (talk) 20:09, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the EFD talk page or in a rant). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was Death by horrendous singing, looking particularly at GlassCobra and TPH (my singing, of course, is absolutely excellent ^{[citation needed]}, but it's canceled out). —Ed (talk • majestic titan) 02:26, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

King of Hearts

I was going to speedy delete it under G7, but since other users have made highly constructive, substantial edits, I am bringing it here for discussion. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:34, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

• Make him a bureaucrat, oversighter, checkuser, arbitrator, ombudsman, Trustee, steward, and a Jimbo action figure - He's already the king of hearts, why not make him the king of all WMF? Or, we could do that by merging him with Wikipedia, Jimmy Wales, and Wikimedia Foundation. --Dylan620 (contribs, logs) 17:42, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
• Promote to Ace of Hearts. --[midnight comet] [talk] 17:56, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
  • Not in the original. --A More Perfect Onion (talk) 14:08, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
• Merge with Queen of Hearts, thus producing Prince of Hearts.^[3][4] More <3 is never a bad thing. Jafeluv (talk) 11:49, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

• Delete, clear ATTACK of a subordinate, or transwiki and merge.  Chzz  ►  12:49, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
• Put a skirt on him and make him the new mascot at Hearts. ϢereSpielChequers 15:21, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
• Delete - the Queen of Hearts is always your best best. —Ed (Talk • Contribs) 16:28, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
• Delete pfft .. trump their but ... Ace over king = delete — Ched :  ?  05:52, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
• Trump with Ace of Spades. "You know you're going to lose, cause gambling's for fools..." GlassCobra 16:43, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
• Cautious delete per G20. --A More Perfect Onion (talk) 12:57, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
• Speedy merge into Gambling. Kayau Odyssey HUCK FINN to the lighthouse BACK FROM EXAMS 14:18, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
• Playin' with the queen of hearts / Knowin' it ain't really smart / Joker ain't the only fool / Who'd do anything for you Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 03:12, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the EFD talk page or in a rant). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.