This page contains material which is kept because the contents are considered humorous. They are not intended, nor should they be used, for any research or serious use.

Editors for deletion (EfD), originally created by R then recreated by LaraLove Jennavecia and then given to GlassCobra, is where Wikipedians discuss whether an editor should be deleted. Editors listed here are debated for up to ∞, after which the deletion process proceeds based on Wikipedia community consensus. The editor is then either kept, merged and/or redirected, transwikied, renamed/moved to another username, or deleted, deleted and salted, or deleted, salted and peppered (with a side of onion rings) per the deletion policy.^[Verify]

This page explains what you should consider before nominating, the steps for nominating single or multiple editors, and how to discuss an EfD. It also lists the editors currently under consideration and includes a 'hall of notoriety'.

• You must not be listed here.
• The editor must not be listed here.
• The editor must be established and active, as new users may not understand the seriousness of this process.
• You may not list more than one editor per week.

If you want to participate in this page, the following must be met:

• You must not be listed here.
• You must understand WP:CIVIL, WP:NPA, and WP:DRRC, acknowledge that those policies apply here, as everywhere else on Wikipedia, and that any violations could result in a block. Be funny, not a dick.
• Your participation here can not exceed 1% of your regular daily edits.^[Who?]
• You must agree to never revert to re-add any comment that has been removed by any administrator (or the nominated user) for any reason.

Criteria for editor deletion

If you get past the instruction creep and understand the deletion process, consult the Criteria for editor deletion and the instructions below on how to list editors for deletion. Any debates which violate the above will be removed. Do not nominate anyone unless you are reasonably sure they will accept the nomination. If you are nominating someone you do not know well, please avoid embarrassing yourself and ask them if they will accept the nomination before nominating them. Further, no editor may be nominated more than once.

Instructions

To list a candidate, put his or her name in a level three category below, and leave {{subst:User:GlassCobra/Editor for deletion/Talk Notice}} on the editor's talk page. When ever you feel like it, close the debate placing {{subst:User:GlassCobra/Editor for deletion/top}} at the top and {{subst:User:GlassCobra/Editor for deletion/bottom}} at the bottom.

Nominees

Any editor nominated who finds it amusing and wishes to participate may add {{subst:User:GlassCobra/Editor for deletion/Nom}} to their userpage. Do not place this template on the userpage of another editor, even if you nominated them — they can do it themselves, if they so desire. Any editor who does not wish to participate may remove their nomination from this page at any time and list themselves on the opt out list.

Hall of Notoriety
Previous Discussions

Admin has come to my user page and :O OMG stolen mah commas[1], forcing me to protect them[2]. This is unacceptable behavior, and shows that he is probably a sock of Jimbo Wales. Therefore he must be deleted at once! --Coffee // have a cup // ark // 02:32, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

• Strong Remove from Jimbo's Underpants as nom --Coffee // have a cup // ark // 02:32, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
• Uber strong keep - If he's deleted I'll have to edit Bill Buchanan all by mahself ^_^ Steven Zhang ^{The clock is ticking....} 02:39, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
• Punish Steal his commas for punishment.--Giants27(c|s) 02:46, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Nominator's rationale: Destroy. This user and his robot army already control everything at Wikipedia:Requests for comment, Wikipedia:Requested moves, Wikipedia:Proposed mergers and Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion, with the stated intent to achieve more Lebensraum at the peaceful realm of category renames. Clearly this user is after total and utter dominance and Jimboship, and should be stopped at whatever cost. Upon deletion, I will assume control of the robot army as your new benevolent dictator. Jafeluv (talk) 11:15, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

• Clearly you haven't heard of my plans to conquer France! I propose we suppress Jafeluv as a political dissident conspiring against the glorious reich. @harej 15:25, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
• Delete but after doing so, give the robot army to SoWhy. I have heard great things about that guy and I am sure he would do much more good with it. ClearlyNotSoWhy 16:03, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
  • This guy seems legit. (I had concerns that this was a plot by SoWhy, but then I noticed the username which clearly states that this is an unrelated editor.) I will consider appointing SoWhy to the position of cleaning my boots once I become Emperor. Jafeluv (talk) 09:42, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
• Strong neutral. I can't be bothered to make up my mind.. --A More Perfect Onion (talk) 12:55, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

HLEP HERLP is this ok place to be asking question here? MY HOVERCRAFT IS FULL OF EELS helepe — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chzz (talk • contribs) — Chzz (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

• Burn with fire And give the robot army to Hagger. Pmlineditor ∞ 09:30, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

As nom I bring this before the community. User:Huntster has shown a blatant disregard for drama, has continually attempted to improve the wiki, has often been kind and welcoming to new users, and has consistently attempted to disrupt daily procedures by actually resolving problems. This type of behavior simply can not be permitted! I propose that this user be deleted post haste. — Ched :  ?  05:21, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

• Delete we have no use for quality people here. — Ched :  ?  05:22, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
• Delete as serving no real purpose. Clearly a sock of some better editor. — Huntster (t @ c) 09:10, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
• I thought that Dumpster and Hamster were both useful articles in their own right. Would it be possible to de-merge them? ϢereSpielChequers 13:52, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
• Speedy keep and expand. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 15:27, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
• Delete as every claim is unverifiable. Unless sources can be provided no point in keeping.--Giants27 (c|s) 17:25, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
• Draw and quarter, productive admins must be treated appropriately. --A More Perfect Onion (talk) 14:56, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
• Subst and Delete - So we can use him on Trout, Boat, and Goldfish. Rowdy the Ant talk to Rowdy 22:45, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:NETPOSITIVE. User seems to think that we're here to write an encyclopedia. Jafeluv (talk) 08:46, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
• De-1337, fails WP:NORULES  Chzz  ►  09:18, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

I was going to speedy delete it under G7, but since other users have made highly constructive, substantial edits, I am bringing it here for discussion. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:34, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

• Make him a bureaucrat, oversighter, checkuser, arbitrator, ombudsman, Trustee, steward, and a Jimbo action figure - He's already the king of hearts, why not make him the king of all WMF? Or, we could do that by merging him with Wikipedia, Jimmy Wales, and Wikimedia Foundation. --Dylan620 (contribs, logs) 17:42, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
• Promote to Ace of Hearts. --[midnight comet] [talk] 17:56, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
  • Not in the original. --A More Perfect Onion (talk) 14:08, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
• Merge with Queen of Hearts, thus producing Prince of Hearts.^[3][4] More <3 is never a bad thing. Jafeluv (talk) 11:49, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

• Delete, clear ATTACK of a subordinate, or transwiki and merge.  Chzz  ►  12:49, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
• Put a skirt on him and make him the new mascot at Hearts. ϢereSpielChequers 15:21, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
• Delete - the Queen of Hearts is always your best best. —Ed (Talk • Contribs) 16:28, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
• Delete pfft .. trump their but ... Ace over king = delete — Ched :  ?  05:52, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
• Trump with Ace of Spades. "You know you're going to lose, cause gambling's for fools..." GlassCobra 16:43, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
• Cautious delete per G20. --A More Perfect Onion (talk) 12:57, 30 September 2009 (UTC)