The template you named is the Commons version. I was referring to {{ConfirmationImageOTRS}}. Since only users with OTRS access can confirm permission has been given, they are the only ones who can add that template. One of the other templates in Category:OTRS templates is used to inform others that the claim has been made. - Mgm|^(talk) 20:32, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'll see if I can dig up a bit more on Leonard Stanley, although the British -History Online article will make a good source. Good find :). FlowerpotmaN·(t) 22:06, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No worries! I'd guess there's a fair bit of useful stuff there. Looks like the village has at least a school and football club, so there should be lots out there. The name sounds kind of like a 70s third-division footballer, though :) Gonzonoir (talk) 22:54, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Got a Mavis Enderby and Old Bolingbroke feel about the name for me. Yeah, seems to be a population in the hundreds all right. Useless trivia: it was the ancestral home of Billy Butlin. I'll fiddle with the article if I think about it over the weekend. FlowerpotmaN·(t) 21:52, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article James Chippendale, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Is there really any sound evidence of notability here?

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Orange Mike | Talk 17:59, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I templated you because I wanted more than one set of eyes here. I only really consider the fourth item a solid source; the others are more or less fluffy (especially the third, which is a blog). --Orange Mike | Talk 18:12, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nah, I'm not that much of a deletionist; AfD would be overdoing it at this stage. Just clean it up, and maybe let me know when you think it's properly cleansed; then we can discuss it. --Orange Mike | Talk 18:22, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect was exactly the way to go. It preserves, not destroys, the page history. I've reinstated it. DGG (talk) 20:34, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - are you absolutely sure? The Fairway Markets had the longer page history, but is now just a redirect, while Fairway Market singular was created only today and had very little history. I think it should be the other way round. Gonzonoir (talk) 20:57, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes,we can reverse it. Personally, I dont think its worth the trouble--see WP:MOVE. Some people may think it matters. If you want, ask at WP:RM, I won't object. The main thing anyway is to build up the article, because i think it will be nominated for deletion by people who do not realize the importance. DGG (talk) 21:42, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see Cunard requested (and Anthony Appleyard carried out) a history merge last night, so looks like all's well that ends well. I'll see if I can find some material to build it up over the weekend. Gonzonoir (talk) 09:56, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Still learning Wikipedia formatting, so excuse me if I'm not looking completely professional on this talk page! Anyways, I am helping the Fairway Market page grow. I have the correct logo with white background as a jpg. Is this the person to come to, to help me get that uploaded into the infobox? Would you want it on a server to download if you are able to help? (looks like I need help from an administrator) Thanks! Meverbeaver (talk) 14:57, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I actually haven't read it yet, though I bought it over Christmas. I don't want to read your article before I've read the book and taken notes on it. I've added it to my watchlist and I'll get back to it in due time.Zigzig20s (talk) 22:44, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of The Trouble With Normal (book) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Gary King (talk) 17:50, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Gonzo! Yeah, just go ahead and copy/paste things from sandbox. The move function is really only for when you want to create a redirect, and when you move a page one is created automatically (as you correctly said). So, if you tried to move from a sandbox, you'd either get an error or a pretty messed up redirect. It's true that your history is gone when you copy/paste, but it's rare to get more than one contributor working together in a sandbox, so it's not really a big deal. By the way, many congrats on getting into DYK! You are plunging into WP fast and furious, and are thus my hero. Let me know if you want me to look over an article before it goes to FA/GA as a first-run edit. :) FlyingToaster 08:59, 18 February 2009 (UTC) [reply]