Speedway

Bernard of Auvergne

For other uses, see Bernard of Auvergne (disambiguation).
Start of Bernard's critique of James of Viterbo in the manuscript Toulouse 744

Bernard of Auvergne was a French Dominican theologian and philosopher who was the bishop-elect of Clermont from 1304 to 1307. He is known for his defence of Thomism.

Life

Bernard was a native of Gannat. He entered the Dominican Order at Clermont.[1][2]

As a Bachelor of Theology,[3] Bernard lectured on Peter Lombard's Sentences at the University of Paris at an unknown date.[4] It is unknown, however, he ever became a regent master. In 1302 or 1303, he became the prior of the convent of Saint-Jacques in Paris.[5] In 1303, he led the convent in opposing Pope Boniface VIII's bull Unam sanctam.[1][3] In 1304, he was elected to succeed Peter of Auvergne as bishop of Clermont. His election was disputed and ultimately quashed by Pope Clement V in 1307.[5]

Works

Bernard was a Thomist and a staunch defender of Thomas Aquinas against his critics, for which he earned the nickname Malleus (hammer).[1] His commentary on the Sentences is partially extant in a Prague manuscript copy covering only the first book.[6][7] It was printed at Lyon in 1519. Among his other works are five questions he answered in a public disputation and four sermons he preached between 1301 and 1305.[1] In addition, an anonymous impugnatio (attack) against Giles of Rome is often but not universally attributed to him.[6]

Bernard's most important writings are his three reprobationes, also called impugnationes or improbationes.[5] These were "hostile reviews" or "impugnments" responding to some of the quodlibetal answers of Godfrey of Fontaines, James of Viterbo and Henry of Ghent.[8] They were composed in that order. The reprobatio to Godfrey was written between 1298 and 1304 and that to Henry was finished by 1315.[6] The reprobationes were widely read, being cited by John Capreolus, Peter of Palude, Henry of Herford, James of Metz, Hervaeus Natalis, Durand of Saint-Pourçain, John Baconthorpe, Michael of Massa and Giovanni Pico della Mirandola. Two full and four fragmentary manuscript copies of the reprobatio to Godfrey are known; five copies of the reprobatio to James; and nine of that of Henry.[9]

Against Godfrey and Henry, Bernard defends Aquinas' metaphysical notion of the composition of essence and existence.[10] With Godfrey, he critiques James of Viterbo's notion of divine ideas whereby they have a separate existence from God himself while not actual existence until created.[11] On economic questions, Bernard rejects Henry of Ghent's defence of money-changing (campsoria) as too involved. The ethical money-changer (campsor) is justly compensated for his services and there is no more that needs to be said. He also rejects Henry's early view of rents, arguing that a rental contract created a transferrable "right to receive money" (ius percipiendi pecuniam). Henry himself eventual yielded to this view.[12]

References

Notes

  1. ^ a b c d Glorieux 2003.
  2. ^ Langholm 1992, pp. 295.
  3. ^ a b Toste 2010.
  4. ^ Friedman 2007, p. 412. Glorieux 2003 places his lectures in the period 1294–1297.
  5. ^ a b c Friedman 2007, p. 412.
  6. ^ a b c Friedman 2007, pp. 412–413.
  7. ^ Courtenay 2015, p. 23.
  8. ^ Langholm 1992, pp. 295–296.
  9. ^ Friedman 2007, pp. 413–414.
  10. ^ Côté 2016, p. 152.
  11. ^ Côté 2016, p. 164.
  12. ^ Langholm 1992, pp. 297–298.

Works cited

Further reading

  • Heynck, Valens (1963). "Die Kontroverse zwischen Gottfried von Fontaines und Bernhard von Auvergne OP um die Lehre des hl. Thomas von der confessio informis". Franziskanische Studien. 45: 201–242.
  • Pattin, Adriaan (1962). "La structure de l'être fini selon Bernard d'Auvergne, O.P. († après 1307)". Tijdschrift voor Filosofie. 24: 668–737. JSTOR 40881023.
Quelle: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernard_of_Auvergne