Welcome to the assessment department of the Rivers WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's River articles. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

Category:River articles by quality serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist. The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{River}} project banner. Filling in a rating in the class parameter of the {{River}} template on the talk page of an article causes the name of that article to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:River articles by quality.

The template banner, {{River|class =|importance =|attention =|mapneeded = |needs-infobox =}} is added to the talk pages of river articles. and gives:

Rivers Unassessed

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver ??? This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. More information: /  This article has been marked as needing immediate attention. This article has been marked as needing an infobox. This article needs a map.

• {{River|mapneeded=yes}} will add the article to Category:River articles needing maps
• Full details at {{River}}.

An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WikiProject Banner Shell}}. Articles that have the {{River}} project banner on their talk page will be added to the appropriate categories by quality.

The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Content assessment for assessment criteria):

FA (for featured articles only; adds articles to Category:FA-Class River articles)		FA
A (adds articles to Category:A-Class River articles)		A
GA (for good articles only; adds articles to Category:GA-Class River articles)		GA
B (adds articles to Category:B-Class River articles)		B
C (adds articles to Category:C-Class River articles)		C
Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class River articles)		Start
Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class River articles)		Stub
FL (for featured lists only; adds articles to Category:FL-Class River articles)		FL
List (adds articles to Category:List-Class River articles)		List

For non-standard grades and non-mainspace content, the following values may be used for the class parameter:

An article's importance assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the {{River}} project banner on its talk page:

The following values may be used for the importance parameter to describe the relative importance of the article within the project (see Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Priority of topic for assessment criteria):

The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

Unexpected changes, such as downgrading an article, or raising it more than two assessment classes at once, are shown in bold.

• Baga Turgen Waterfall (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Creeks of Alabama (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Creeks of Alabama by county (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Creeks of Alaska (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Creeks of Alaska by borough (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Creeks of Anchorage, Alaska (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Creeks of Apache County, Arizona (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Creeks of Arizona (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Creeks of Arizona by county (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Creeks of Chambers County, Alabama (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Creeks of Choctaw County, Alabama (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Creeks of Clarke County, Alabama (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Creeks of Cochise County, Arizona (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Creeks of Coconino County, Arizona (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Creeks of Colbert County, Alabama (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Creeks of Denali Borough, Alaska (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Creeks of Gila County, Arizona (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Creeks of Graham County, Arizona (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Creeks of Juneau, Alaska (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Creeks of Kenai Peninsula Borough, Alaska (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Creeks of Ketchikan Gateway Borough, Alaska (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Creeks of Lauderdale County, Alabama (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Creeks of Marion County, Alabama (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Creeks of Navajo County, Arizona (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Creeks of North Slope Borough, Alaska (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Creeks of Northwest Arctic Borough, Alaska (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Creeks of Pima County, Arizona (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Creeks of Randolph County, Alabama (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Creeks of Santa Cruz County, Arizona (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Creeks of Shelby County, Alabama (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Creeks of Sumter County, Alabama (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Creeks of Unorganized Borough, Alaska (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Creeks of Yavapai County, Arizona (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Creeks of the Kenai Peninsula (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Creeks of the Mogollon Rim (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Ikpoba River (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
• Draft:Raiketan River (talk) assessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Waterfalls of Mongolia (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)

• Barkly River (Victoria) renamed to Barkly River.

• Barkly River (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)

• River Kyle (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Draft:Thee clear-flowing rivers in Japan (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from NA-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)

• Vetter Creek (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)

• River Wye, Derbyshire (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from C-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)

• Acequia Mayor Aljufía (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
• Bermecke (Heve) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)

• Kaituna River (Canterbury) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)

• Draft:Alder Bourne (talk) assessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Skawa (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)

• East Branch Sugar Creek (Sugar Creek tributary) renamed to East Branch Sugar Creek.

• Khachig River (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Slippery Rock Creek (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
• Zuya (river) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)

• East Branch Sugar Creek (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Draft:Twin Creek (Clear Creek Tributary) (talk) assessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)