This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Economics. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion

Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:

1. and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
2. You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Economics|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.

There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.

Removing a closed AfD discussion

Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.

Other types of discussions

You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Economics. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.

Further information

For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.

Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:

• WikiProject Deletion sorting/Economics/archive

Gold Card (residence permit) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Pretty clear-cut case of WP:TRUMPCRUFT. Fails WP:CRYSTAL, no indication that this will actually be pursued. E_F⁵ 14:37, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Economic citizenship or something similar. This is not a 'clear cut' case of WP:TRUMPCRUFT , this is legitimate proposed policy afaik, but i would agree it doesn't warrant its own article. Braedencapaul (talk) 14:42, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep and Rename to "Gold Card (proposal)" This surmounts CRYSTAL as the article is about a policy proposal which does actually exist, not a residence permit that does not (see other non-CRYSTAL articles about policy proposals such as Proposed United States acquisition of Greenland, Proposals for new Australian states, Proposals for a European Super League in association football, etc.). However, the title needs to be modified to match the text of the article. Beyond that, sufficient WP:RS to pass WP:N. Worst case scenario we should wait two weeks and evaluate then to see if it passes WP:10YT based on sustained coverage or implementation. Chetsford (talk) 15:47, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

fine with this but would still prefer a better disambiguation (proposed residence permit)? absolutely this one will require future re-evaluation, but at this point that would be fine. Braedencapaul (talk) 17:27, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: TOOSOON. Honestly Trump says all kind of things... We've been waiting for tariffs in Canada "shortly" or "very soon" for three months now. I'd take anything he says with a grain of salt, and this is no different. If/when it becomes a thing, we can revisit. Oaktree b (talk) 15:47, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  think this was what he was talking about with WP:TRUMPCRUFT, but as noted above, if the article is written about the subject as a "policy proposal" the speed of implementation isn't really relevant to its notability. Braedencapaul (talk) 17:33, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:59, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law, Politics, and Economics. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:47, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• I think this is important information regardless of whether it has been implemented as policy. It was stated by trump that this “gold card,” was going to replace the existing green card. It’s important to document all of the random things that his administration says they’re going to do, just to keep track. This proposal is to increase the price of citizenship from 1 million to five, and the wording indicates to me that it’s also is a potential creation of a tax haven in the USA, for wealthy people from other countries to stash income made in other countries, tax free. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Noahhumphrieslepage (talk • contribs) 20:00, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete — Per Oaktree b. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 03:58, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

IZA Journal of Development and Migration (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Insignificant journal, publishing discontinued for years. Newklear007 (talk) 14:12, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academic journals and Economics. Newklear007 (talk) 14:12, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Non-notable journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. --Randykitty (talk) 16:46, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

International Journal of Central Banking (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Hijacked vanity journal, low IF and of questionable notability - see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Academic_Journals/Journals_cited_by_Wikipedia/Questionable1 I enjoy sandwiches (talk) 23:34, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academic journals and Economics. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 00:16, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: Included in major selective databases (Scopus, Social Science Citation Index), clear meet of NJournals. Nobody (talk) 09:58, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Dont agree with lack of notability. There is a direct link from the website of the Bank of International Settlements (although it only comes up on 2nd Google page). Plus several very credible macroeconomists are part of the editorial board. Pragmatic Puffin (talk) 14:55, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, per 1AmNobody24. It getting hijacked means it's a victim of its success. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 02:20, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nigeria ICT Fest (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sourced to primary sources and routine coverage. Not notable. Princess of Ara 18:10, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Economics, and Nigeria. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:48, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 19:14, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Keep: Article might be relivant in future, there are few details to look up to per references. Kingsize8 (talk) 00:22, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  See WP:CRYSTAL. Articles that might be relevant in the future are not appropriate for Wikipedia. Madeleine (talk) 01:22, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Fails WP:GNG per lack of significant coverage in independent sources. Madeleine (talk) 01:23, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]