Wikipedia:WikiProject Apple Inc./Assessment
This is the assessment department of WikiProject Apple Inc. Its goal is to assess the quality of Wikipedia's Apple Inc. articles. Article ratings are used to help recognize excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work, and are also expected to play a role in the Version 1.0 Editorial Team program.
Assessment is done in a distributed way through parameters in the {{WikiProject Apple Inc.}} talk page banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Apple Inc. articles by quality and Category:Apple Inc. articles by importance.
Article statistics
Guidelines to Assessment
Quality assessment
An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WikiProject Banner Shell}}. Articles that have the {{WikiProject Apple Inc.}} project banner on their talk page will be added to the appropriate categories by quality.
The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Content assessment for assessment criteria):
| FA (for featured articles only; adds articles to Category:FA-Class Apple Inc. articles) |  FA |
|
| A (adds articles to Category:A-Class Apple Inc. articles) |  A |
|
| GA (for good articles only; adds articles to Category:GA-Class Apple Inc. articles) |  GA |
|
| B (adds articles to Category:B-Class Apple Inc. articles) | B | |
| C (adds articles to Category:C-Class Apple Inc. articles) | C | |
| Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class Apple Inc. articles) | Start | |
| Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class Apple Inc. articles) | Stub | |
| FL (for featured lists only; adds articles to Category:FL-Class Apple Inc. articles) | FL |
|
| List (adds articles to Category:List-Class Apple Inc. articles) | List |
For non-standard grades and non-mainspace content, the following values may be used for the class parameter:
| Category (for categories; adds pages to Category:Category-Class Apple Inc. pages) | Category | |
| Disambig (for disambiguation pages; adds pages to Category:Disambig-Class Apple Inc. pages) | Disambig | |
| Draft (for drafts; adds pages to Category:Draft-Class Apple Inc. pages) | Draft | |
| File (for files and timed text; adds pages to Category:File-Class Apple Inc. pages) | File | |
| Portal (for portal pages; adds pages to Category:Portal-Class Apple Inc. pages) | Portal | |
| Project (for project pages; adds pages to Category:Project-Class Apple Inc. pages) | Project | |
| Redirect (for redirect pages; adds pages to Category:Redirect-Class Apple Inc. pages) | Redirect | |
| Template (for templates and modules; adds pages to Category:Template-Class Apple Inc. pages) | Template | |
| NA (for any other pages where assessment is unnecessary; adds pages to Category:NA-Class Apple Inc. pages) | NA | |
| ??? (articles for which a valid class has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Apple Inc. articles) | ??? |
Quality scale
Importance assessment
An article's importance assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the {{WikiProject Apple Inc.}} project banner on its talk page:
The following values may be used for the importance parameter to describe the relative importance of the article within the project (see Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Priority of topic for assessment criteria):
| Top (adds articles to Category:Top-importance Apple Inc. articles) | Top | |
| High (adds articles to Category:High-importance Apple Inc. articles) | High | |
| Mid (adds articles to Category:Mid-importance Apple Inc. articles) | Mid | |
| Low (adds articles to Category:Low-importance Apple Inc. articles) | Low | |
| NA (adds articles to Category:NA-importance Apple Inc. articles) | NA | |
| ??? (articles for which a valid importance rating has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unknown-importance Apple Inc. articles) | ??? |
Importance scale
Really, go with your gut when assessing importance. I (DFlhb) just created this importance scale (and added examples) so that we have something, but feel free to boldly change it, and again, go with your gut, and use your own judgment. This table isn't meant as a "top-down" edict; just use it if you're confused.
Assessment log
February 28, 2025
Assessed
- Draft:Amanda Chioma David (talk) assessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
February 26, 2025
Reassessed
Removed
February 24, 2025
Renamed
- Screen of death renamed to System crash screen.
Assessed
- System crash screen (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
Removed
- Draft:NOXGAMES (talk) removed.
Requests
Please visit the talk page to request an assessment.