Speedway

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 February 6

February 6

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on February 6, 2025.

Iupac nomenclature

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to IUPAC nomenclature of chemistry. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 00:49, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Iupac nomenclature is clearly short for IUPAC nomenclature of chemistry and reflects the fact that people don't always type all-caps when searching. IUPAC nomenclature (all-caps) already redirects to IUPAC nomenclature of chemistry and this change would bring the uncapitalized version into alignment with the all-caps version. Iupac nomenclature currently redirects to chemical nomenclature which is a broader topic than the IUPAC standards. While some people may say chemical nomenclature when they specifically mean IUPAC, readers who type in Iupac nomenclature should be directed to the article for which that is shorthand. Please note, there was a brief merge discussion at Talk:International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry#Merge proposal where it was determined that IUPAC nomenclature of chemistry should be kept and improved. --MYCETEAE 🍄‍🟫—talk 22:05, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Notices posted on talk pages of the redirect's creator (User:Eequor) and most recent editor (User:Pablo Busatto), both of whom appear inactive. Notices also posted at talk pages for International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry, Chemical nomenclature, IUPAC nomenclature of chemistry, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Chemistry. Ping @Niodium: and @DMacks: who participated in the merge discussion. --MYCETEAE 🍄‍🟫—talk 22:20, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Yes. Retarget. No discussion needed.
YBG (talk) 05:25, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Agree on retarget to IUPAC nomenclature of chemistry. Fishsicles (talk) 13:48, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

2026 Union budget of India

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:49, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Too Soon. No notable coverage in article, or in list of budgets. Blethering Scot 20:14, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Definitely WP:TOOSOON. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:20, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Magick

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 00:49, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Should rather redirect to the disambiguation page Magic, as "magick" is foremost an alternative spelling of "magic" and is even covered in that disambiguation page since earlier. Blockhaj (talk) 19:54, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think its better to prioritize the broader image than "most folks", because we have no way of measuring that properly. Blockhaj (talk) 21:25, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Nyttend. Second choice could be 'Magic (supernatural)' or 'Magick (Book 4)'. Since these options exist the disamb. page would be the fourth or fifth choice. Randy Kryn (talk) 03:56, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Nyttend and Randy Kryn; the specific magic that Crowley revived with the term is most fully described at the current target; Magic (supernatural) isn't bad per se, but it is much broader that the modern use of the term. Which brings us to Magick (Book 4), the 1929 book that revived and defined the term in modern usage, might possibly be the most "correct". In any case, magick refers to the robe, dagger, pentacle type magic, not the rabbit out of the hat variety. Skyerise (talk) 06:47, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Crowley was a nut case and for us unfamiliar with his work it is absolutely ludicrus that a simple alternate spelling of magic should be specifically associated with his work. It is an alternative spelling and our search terms should reflect that first and foremost. Blockhaj (talk) 03:28, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

3000s

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Retarget to the corresponding disambiguation pages. Jay 💬 20:01, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

These were last discussed at Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2022_August_20#3000s. Most of the 236 redirects were deleted, while 39 of them were retargeted to disambiguation pages or products as {{R from plural}}. These redirects did not reach a consensus for action. In that discussion, one user suggested retargeting to the disambiguation pages 3000, 4000, and 5000 as {{R from plural}}. Another suggested that they kept as plausible search terms for the first few millennia after the 3rd millennium — in particular, 3000s (millennium) redirects to Timeline of the far future as well. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 07:56, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 19:27, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Brave Books

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 February 15#Brave Books

ALCS

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Jay 💬 18:19, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"ALCS" is a very ambiguous term, and not everyone associates that with what it currently redirects to. Many people also associate that with a Christian school in Madison, Wisconsin, especially after a recent school shooting there. Cyber the tiger🐯 (talk) 17:59, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

What is wikipedia about

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 February 13#What is wikipedia about

Paris 2024 (disambiguation)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Jay 💬 18:18, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Paris 2024 used to be a redirect, but I turned it into a dab page. I'm not sure what purpose this title ever had; it claimed to be a dab, but in reality was just a redirect to another redirect (and now a redirect to a dab). I'm tempted to WP:G6 it, but people sometimes get touchy about CSD, so bringing it here out of an abundance of caution. RoySmith (talk) 17:15, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

PS, what got me here was when DPL bot tagged Paris 2024 as having ("a large number" of :-)) incoming links to a disambiguation page which needed fixing.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Chancellor of the the University of California, Santa Barbara

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 16:57, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as ungrammatical (of the -> of the the) Duckmather (talk) 16:17, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nice catch. I have just created Chancellor of the University of California, Santa Barbara instead. Thank you for catching this typo. Cfls (talk) 18:09, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

List of people nominated to the Supreme Court of the United States in the last year of a presidency

Does not seem that the target page contains such an organized list of people as stated in the titles of these redirects. Readers searching these terms may not be satisfied with the results, given the target page has no such organization. (However, one of the redirects, List of people nominated to the Supreme Court of the United States in the last year of a presidency, is a {{R from merge}}.) Steel1943 (talk) 06:56, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think the best solution would be to restore the article that was purportedly integrated into another one. Anythingyouwant (talk) 06:49, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No, The rationale for redirecting the article was sound – see:Talk:List of people nominated to the Supreme Court of the United States in the last year of a presidency. The information was integrated into the target article, but its fit did not stand the test of time when the article underwent subsequent expansion and revisions. Drdpw (talk) 01:15, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 02:26, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:09, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bishop of of Tuam, Limerick and Killaloe

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:51, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The duplicate "of" makes this very implausible, but as a 2023 creation, it's old enough that it probably shouldn't be R3-deleted. Nyttend (talk) 09:25, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, delete as ungrammatical Duckmather (talk) 16:15, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Murder of of John Williams

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:51, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The duplicate "of" makes this very implausible, but it was created by a pagemove, so it's not R3-eligible. Nyttend (talk) 09:25, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, delete as ungrammatical Duckmather (talk) 16:17, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment If this is from a page move then there will be links linking to this redirect, but the only pages that do link here are ones related to RfD

WhatLinksHere shows only links in current revisions of articles. Imagine that your article linked to this article at this title, and after it was moved, your article was edited to remove the extra "of". Your article won't show up in WhatLinksHere for "of of". Also, see the page history; it's unquestionably the result of a pagemove. Nyttend (talk) 23:25, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Apache shirt

Appears to refer to shirts commonly worn by the Parisian criminal Apaches (subculture) rather than the Native American tribe. A quick search suggests the most common use by far is a shirt worn by or referencing the Native American Apaches. Rusalkii (talk) 05:21, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 08:40, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. There doesn't appear to be a Wikipedia article about the shirts made by Apaches. You could make a dabpage with Traditional Native American clothing or Buckskins, but that seems like a stretch to me. 162 etc. (talk) 20:24, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 08:38, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sridevi (upcoming film)

This is an {{R from move}} but is misleading and ambiguous (with Sreedevi (film)). Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 19:49, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The subject of Sreedevi (film) is not ambiguous with the nominated redirect, considering the subject of Sreedevi (film) was released in 1977 and is in no way "upcoming". Steel1943 (talk) 19:26, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix (talk) 00:58, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – no longer upcoming. Cremastra (talk) 14:56, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 08:37, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Lasalle College, Bogota

No mention of a "Bogota" branch at the target article. The only content that made it to the main page was immediately reverted in 2013. People who are looking for the Bogota branch of LaSalle College will not be able to read about it at the target page without a mention. Utopes (talk / cont) 15:35, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:42, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 08:29, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

SCCTM

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 00:56, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This abbreviation seems to mostly be used for the South Carolina Council of Teachers of Mathematics. I can't find any usage of it referring to the film. Rusalkii (talk) 00:29, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unless there's an article about the teacher's council mentioned above. Ahri Boy (talk) 10:23, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 03:10, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 08:40, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep per Tavix. Even without a mention there is no confusion, the target is a title with first letters capitalized. Reconsider when the teachers get a page to target. Jay 💬 18:38, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. Keep or delete?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 08:23, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Mars Silvanus

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Jay 💬 16:51, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I created this from an AFC/R request, but there seem to be two good targets and User:Cactusisme seemed to prefer the Silvanus (mythology) target. I personally could be swayed either way, but I lean towards the section in Mars (mythology) that was initially suggested and that I created it pointing to. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 08:11, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I would lean towards keeping it pointing to Mars (mythology), though I think either target would be fine enough. From what I can tell, Cato's passage is the only mention of "Mars Silvanus", and (as we note at Mars's article) it is more likely an asyndetic reference to both gods. At least in the current state of both articles, the section at Mars (mythology) seems to provide the most effective coverage. – Michael Aurel (talk) 01:53, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. The current target seems to note that scholarship seems to consider it a likely interpretation mistake as opposed to a well-attested single entity. Current target also links to Silvanus prominently in the section. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 02:19, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Athena Mapelli Mozzi

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Utopes (talk / cont) 10:12, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm questioning whether we need a Redirect for an infant daughter who has no notability of their own. Liz Read! Talk! 04:51, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Seems harmless to me. The redirect is justified as a topic covered or listed in another article, and the non-notability is all the more reason to keep it as a redirect, since it is not likely to be expanded into an article. I recommend keep. StainedGlassCavern (talk) 05:24, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It's very common to have redirect articles like this, particularly with things like royal children who do not yet - or may never - attain notability in their own right. I also recommend keep. OGBC1992 (talk) 11:19, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Scott Kobos

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Complex/Rational 04:02, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Non-notable minor league player. Removed from target page in Special:Diff/1206094656, has not played since per baseball-reference. Chew(V • T • E) 03:12, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Aramis Ademan

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Complex/Rational 04:02, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Non-notable retired minor league player. Removed in Special:Diff/1065068449. Has not played since leaving the Cubs organization. Chew(V • T • E) 03:08, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Eddy Julio Maritnez

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Complex/Rational 04:02, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Non-notable retired minor league player. Removed in Special:Diff/1020077181 and retired shortly after. A similar redirect to the same player was deleted in Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 3 § Eddy Martínez Chew(V • T • E) 03:04, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Type hint

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Type system#Combining static and dynamic type checking. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:42, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't a PHP-specific thing, so the redirect should ideally be retargeted somewhere Duckmather (talk) 02:44, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Pyston

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Python (programming language)#Other implementations. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 03:23, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure this is a plausible misspelling. I think this is more likely a misspelling of Piston. Duckmather (talk) 02:32, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment a quick google search reveals that it refers to https://github.com/pyston/pyston, which might not be notable Duckmather (talk) 02:33, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

C/-

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Complex/Rational 04:02, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what this might refer to Duckmather (talk) 02:27, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Python (snake)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Consensus that the DAB page is the correct target. Of those participants, it was split between a bare redirect and targeting the section. Since the section is at the top, there's no practical difference, so I am keeping the status quo. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 03:31, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe retarget to Pythonidae? I think the "snake" disambiguator makes it pretty unambiguous, unless you want to also argue that Python (mythology) and Python (programming language) also count as "snakes". Duckmather (talk) 02:23, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

* Retarget per nom. Unambiguous and makes it easier on readers to find desired subject instead of navigating through a DAB page. — 🪫Volatile 📲T | ⌨️C 02:31, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

कल्की केकलां

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:44, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

Alt lang tagged as an R without mention. Without a mention, this does not seem to be a helpful redirect.

This name was removed from the page 8 years ago following an RfD. Tagging as an "R without mention" is not a permanent solution for such RLANGs, as they are generally for pages where such a title is used and at the very least referred to somewhere, to verify the accuracy of the name & search term. Utopes (talk / cont) 23:31, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: The redirect is apparently the Hindi spelling of the name of the subject, who stars in Hindi-language films, correct?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (Goodbye!) 01:32, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mellohi!, Yes. — Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 09:14, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The Hindi name seems relevant to the subject as it is a Hindi language film actress. — Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 09:17, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • That's not a neutral relisting statement, Mellohi. It has been made clear that the person is an actress. The act of starring in an alt-lang film does not automatically necessitate name-translation redirects though. We don't translate the name of a person every time they speak another language. The name was removed from the page 8 years ago as apparently invalid. Echoing what AngusWOOF said at the previous discussion, "You have to keep that in there so that the redirect makes sense. Otherwise there is no value in retaining this when it is not an identifying name for her primary career.", is still true. If it's not an identifying name, then this otherwise does not have enough affinity to stay. Add the name to the infobox if it's actually what she's called, or delete it if it's not; can't have both. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:47, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Given the 2012 RfC about article leads (prior to the last RFD) and the 2017 RfC about infoboxes (after the last RFD, which is why this got removed from the infobox), the relevant editor community have basically said quite strongly that they don't think Indic scripts are useful on English Wikipedia, and they don't want to maintain such content. A {{R without mention}} feels to me like an end-run around the spirit of those RfCs. 59.149.117.119 (talk) 22:55, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete – Non-English redirects such as this are not useful on English Wikipedia. Drdpw (talk) 01:07, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

5.1 Music Disc

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 February 13#5.1 Music Disc

Shoo in

The mention in the article was removed in June 2012. Shoo-in was deleted in May 2024.

Personal commentary: shoe-in is a very annoying typo that I see quite frequently in Wikipedia discussions. Hopefully deletion will serve as a deterrent for that. Sdrqaz (talk) 16:17, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (Goodbye!) 01:25, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Khmer ultranationalism

No mention of "ultra" at the target, nor "ultranationalism". Utopes (talk / cont) 06:50, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It is a plausible search term. GoldenBootWizard276 (talk) 13:54, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I’m specifically referring to the Khmer Rouge. They were some of the most extreme ultranationalists in history because they banned anything that was not Cambodian and killed everyone who did not follow these rules. For example they would kill anyone who were glasses because glasses were not a Cambodian invention. Otis the Texan (talk) 20:04, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
.. they would kill anyone who were glasses because glasses were not a Cambodian invention.[citation needed] Also see Anti-intellectualism#Democratic Kampuchea. Jay 💬 18:27, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 05:03, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Given the newly presented context.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (Goodbye!) 01:16, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. They're obviously related concepts; Khmer ultranationalism is a subset of Khmer nationalism. We routinely expect a redirect to be discussed in the target, but that's because of requirements like relevance (is X related to Y?), which is obvious here because of the titles alone, or because we need to prove that one title is an alternate term for, or related to, the term used for the article title (is "Kampuchea" really related to "Cambodia"?), and again, the terms are obviously related here. Nyttend (talk) 09:29, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Nyttend. This seems to be used a a descriptor/subset, so the current target is fine and helpful to readers. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 07:13, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WLBJ (defunct)

This disambiguator may itself be ambigous; WLBJ-LP is also defunct. (This is a large part of why "defunct" is no longer used as a disambiguator for broadcast station articles.) This may need to be retargeted to WLBJ as an {{R from incomplete disambiguation}}. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:13, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

For what it's worth, WLBJ-LP has been nominated for deletion; if that article is deleted, that might eliminate the need for the WLBJ disambiguation page and render this RfD all but moot. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:12, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Quelle: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2025_February_6