• C1K98V (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)⁽⁾

Hello, I have created 75+ articles, since I got autopatrolled mostly focusing on television series. For transparency, I'm still working on the feedback received from @Schwede66 in my last request. And I intent to keep doing the good work. Thanks for your consideration. Wishing the community a prosperous new year. C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 06:56, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary autopatrolled rights by Schwede66 (expires 00:00, 23 January 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBot ^talk 07:01, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please point to where the date of birth of Gautam Vig is referenced, C1K98V? Schwede66 08:14, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Schwede66, I hope you enjoyed your vacation. I have sourced the DOB in the early life section as per WP:INFOBOXREF. I followed the editing style of Geniac, the way he improved Sheezan Khan and tried adapting the same. Thanks C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 08:48, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I had a fab wee holiday. I don't understand your answer. I see that there is one ref in the infobox, and that reference does confirm the date of birth, but it is attached to the spouse only. Could you please explain what you mean, and how the referencing confirms the date of birth, C1K98V? Schwede66 08:59, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Schwede66 In the above mentioned article I have sourced the date of birth in the Early life section, see here. And the spouse's source is just about their marriage. I'm following the editing style of Geniac, the improvement he did in one of my previously created article see here. Thanks C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 09:38, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, which reference states the date of Vig's date of birth? I cannot see it. Schwede66 18:29, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Schwede66, I have used two sources for DOB, Colors TV and India Today. You can find both the sources in the Early life section. Hope it helps, if you still can't verify the birth date, you're most welcome to remove it. Thanks C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 18:50, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@C1K98V Is it just me or the webpage you're linking to from colorstv.com is redirecting to a /mena/ directory making it impossible to see what you're talking about or citing. As for the indiatoday.in, you did not initially position the citation as of when Schwede66 started reviewing your request, you only repositioned the citation today. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 19:07, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Vanderwaalforces, I'm not sure if the Colorstv website works outside of India. Let's wait for Schwede66 to confirm if they're able to verify it. I'm sharing a screenshot of the website for reference [1]. While searching for sources related to their academics, I found IndiaToday and added it later in the Early life section. I repositioned the named citation as I wanted to highlight it for Schwede66, so I left an edit summary too. Thanks for your consideration. C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 03:43, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) I can access the colorstv source and confirm that it mentions Gautam Vig's date of birth. – DreamRimmer (talk) 12:18, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That's good to know, because I have the same problem that Vanderwaalforces talks about. I will have to get back to this item. Schwede66 07:44, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Walco1 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)⁽⁾

Concise, well-written and sufficiently articles, mostly with a royal or Church of England focus. I looked at an articles of theirs as part of NPP, and found it to be up to standard without editing. Others look reasonable too. Klbrain (talk) 12:15, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• GanzKnusper (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)⁽⁾

91 main space articles, 45 rated above stub, no deletions. I mostly create articles for albums or BLPs of musicians. GanzKnusper (talk) 09:26, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• AlphaBetaGamma (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)⁽⁾

I know my first articles are... bad, but my recent pages, Yumeshima Station, Meitetsu KiHa 10 series, Meitetsu 3400 series, and Resignation services should be good without being patrolled. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 03:11, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• AmateurHi$torian (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)⁽⁾

The user has created 189 articles, and only two have ever been deleted—with one later restored. They have a strong understanding of reliable sources (WP:RS) and are well-versed in BLP policies (WP:BLP). I've reviewed one or two of their articles, and I believe they truly deserve the rights. Baqi:) (talk) 13:03, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Jannatulbaqi: Thanks for considering me :) -AmateurHi$torian (talk) 15:39, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

+1 Good quality and appropriately sourced articles. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 08:35, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• JesusisGreat7 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)⁽⁾

Hey, I been on the wikipedia for nearly 3 months and I have created around 30+ new mainspace articles, most of them are on natural disasters, archeological sites, geographical locations etc, I would like to request Autopatrolled rights permission for my account. My articles meets with the Wikipedia guidelines and policies and are properly cited with reliable souces, The list of articles started by me are on my userpage, None of which have been deleted and have been reviewed by other admins!

Reason for requesting -- I think getting this right would help to reduce workload for new articles, And would help me to give my best for wikipedia. Thanks! JesusisGreat7 (talk) 05:42, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done Many of the 29 articles are very short stubs (Dunjkovec for example), and some of the created articles (such as the BLP Bajinder Singh) had sourcing issues that resulted in some cleanup that may have been missed if it were autopatrolled. The history section of the article 1880 Nainital landslide only has one source, an excerpt from a work of historical fiction. I think these articles should continue to be reviewed for the time being, which will not affect your ability to create articles. - Aoidh (talk) 06:10, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can I expect to get the right once these issues are fixed, I mean when the articles mentioned above gets reviewed?? JesusisGreat7 (talk) 06:26, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) Being auto-patrolled does not give you any technical ability; not even a single technical ability. I’m not sure you should be worried about becoming one for now, just focus on your work, do reasonably neat job, when you start to trouble our NPP queue by creating plenty of fine articles that we do not really need to look at as NPPers, someone like an NPPer could nominate you to become autopatrolled. Hope this helps. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 06:35, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I did a mistake requesting so early, I think I should continue to work normally JesusisGreat7 (talk) 06:41, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Paradoxodarap (requesting Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewer) (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)⁽⁾

Hello, I would like to request AutoPatrolled rights. I have been actively contributing to Wikipedia since December 2020, with over 1,090 total edits (945 live edits) and 154 articles created (121 currently live).

Reasons for requesting AutoPatrolled rights:

• Experience in article creation: I have created numerous articles that meet Wikipedia’s notability, verifiability, and neutrality guidelines.
• Understanding of Wikipedia policies: As an Extended Confirmed User, I follow Wikipedia’s Manual of Style, Cite Sources, and Notability Guidelines.
• Reducing admin workload: Granting AutoPatrolled rights would help reduce the backlog for New Page Patrollers, as my articles generally do not require manual review.
• Clean track record: I have never been blocked and maintain a history of constructive contributions.

I appreciate your time and consideration. Thank you! bɑʁɑqoxodaraP (talk) 10:36, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• VortexPhantom (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)⁽⁾

*Request for Auto-Patrolled Rights*

Dear Wikipedia Administrators,

I am requesting *auto-patrolled rights* to streamline my contributions. Over the past month, I have actively edited Wikipedia, focusing on *Politics, Infrastructure, and Technology in India*.

With 100+ constructive edits, I have developed a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s policies and formatting. Granting me *autopatrolled status* will help improve efficiency by reducing manual reviews. As there are not any specific requirements for autopatrolled right, I think I am suitable for this right.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Best regards, VortexPhantom (talk) 11:17, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. User:VortexPhantom The expectation is to have created 25 articles without any significant problems for autopatrolled, which you are quite far from at the moment. Please ensure you read the requirements before requesting permissions. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 11:39, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't saw that before, thanks, not be repeated next time. VortexPhantom (talk) 11:41, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]