Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Pinkie Pride/1
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result: Kept. 🌙Eclipse (she/they/all neos • talk • edits) 14:38, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
This article heavily relies on primary sources; WP:ABOUTSELF wouldn't apply here, as it says such sources can be used for info about the subject as long as it's uncontroversially talking about itself (
) and not used in excess. (
) 🌙Eclipse (she/they/it/other neos • talk • edits) 11:39, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
- I do not think that it needs to be delisted at the moment per the arguments given in Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Neighbours 30th Anniversary/1 and WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD. Additionally, several of the primary sources are then backed up by secondary sources. DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 02:02, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.