The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. (non-admin closure) Vanderwaalforces (talk) 20:37, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tina Albanese (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This person doesn't seem notable enough to me. I cannot find any news coverage about her. Aŭstriano (talk) 01:21, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Women, Television, and United States of America. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:23, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: The article lacks sufficient independent, reliable sources to establish her notability. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moopaz (talk • contribs) 22:08, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: The only "vote" is from an account that was created today. I'd like to hear more opinions.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:02, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep I think she meets WP:CREATIVE #3: "The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work. In addition, such work must have been the primary subject of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews". Apart from her other work, she co-wrote and co-executive produced 3 seasons of See Dad Run, and that has been the primary subject of multiple independent reviews. Some of the references from the See Dad Run article could be added here. RebeccaGreen (talk) 14:07, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:59, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:24, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Patrick_Labyorteaux#Personal_life: she is mentioned there and she co-wrote[created/produced; no writing credits: https://variety.com/2012/tv/reviews/see-dad-run-1117948533/] See Dad Run with him. I am not opposed to the Keep RebeccaGreen is suggesting if she and other users really think her role in the series was essential. -Mushy Yank. 18:42, 21 January 2025 (UTC) [Edited; see below][reply]

  I would not consider co-creating and co-producing a 3 season TV series part of her husband's personal life! RebeccaGreen (talk) 13:29, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  D sure, that work is not part of her husband's personal life (although it is part of his professional life, because the second co-producer is him) but still she can be mentioned [and redirected] there. If you prefer it can be redirected to the series itself. Again, if you and other users agree she's notable for having co-created/produced the series, not opposed to K. -Mushy Yank. 10:50, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect either to Patrick_Labyorteaux or perhaps to See Dad Run directly. I'd otherwise lean against keeping.. I agree she meets WP:CREATIVE #3, and she definitely deserves credit for her work. But I see those additional criteria more as something that strengthens a case (and a reason to expect that we might find significant coverage). But I'm having a hard time finding much beyond her IMDB. Even if someone is important for their work, we really can't write much in a WP:BLP without WP:SIGCOV in reliable sources Mlkj (talk) 22:51, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  In fact, no, if you really think she meets Wikipedia:CREATIVE or Wikipedia:PRODUCER, it's a perfectly valid path for inclusion. -Mushy Yank. 10:53, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: Per RebeccaGreen. Topic meets WP:NCREATIVE#3. Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 06:41, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.