The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:19, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Mustard Grain (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NFILM, with the only sources provided being an IMDb page and a passing mention in a compendium. My WP:BEFORE check did not bring up anything of note, though similarly titled things may be muddying results. Kirbanzo ^{(talk - contribs)} 22:00, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Spain. Kirbanzo ^{(talk - contribs)} 22:00, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: For analysis of the newly added references.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:48, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Admissible after the recent improvements.--Asqueladd (talk) 09:03, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as the article has been improved since nomination with the addition of a reception section based on significant coverage in reliable sources such as El Pais so that WP:GNG is passed and deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 01:28, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.