The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 21:18, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Give Thanks (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Also nominating:

Steadfast Love (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

God for Us (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Bless the Lord (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Thank You Lord (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Not notable. Insufficient secondary sources to meet WP:NALBUMS notability guidelines. The albums are already mentioned in songwriter's article at Don Moen (singer). See entire list of songwriters albums at Category:Don Moen live albums. The article on Give Thanks says that particular album went "gold", but I don't see a reliable source that establishes that fact. If we can get sources, perhaps that album's article could be kept. But the others are even less notable. -- Noleander, (talk) 15:12, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 16:16, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 16:17, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• I call BS on the gold claim. RIAA says nothing of that sort. Where'd the secondary source get that from? Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 21:39, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:44, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 04:36, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - All of them fail WP:NALBUMS notability guidelines. --Cox wasan (talk) 11:28, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete These CD's/Album's are not at all notable. --Iairsometimes (talk) 20:33, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.