The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. GirthSummit _(blether) 11:21, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Family for Christmas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable television film, does not meet WP:NF, no significant independent coverage BOVINEBOY2008 01:14, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 01:18, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Is written like an advertisement.

–Cupper52^Discuss! 11:22, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 11:51, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Christmas movies are far too common for all of them to be default notable. The sourcing here is not enough to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:01, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - lack of independent sources to establish notability of the film Spiderone 12:52, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.