Speedway

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Education Reform in Kentucky

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. plicit 03:05, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Education Reform in Kentucky (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is an old Wiki Ambassador Program article, and has all the worst tendencies of such articles. Issues are as follows:

  1. Though the titular subject is a notable one, it's not clear why it should be separate from History of education in Kentucky
  2. The text is of low quality and reads very much like a high school paper, not like a proper WP article. It's basically a long three-point essay.
  3. It's at least a decade out of date.
  4. It contains no discussion of important topics like the very important 1990s education reform, the CATS test and its successors, or the 2024 referendum, apart from one sentence at the begining
  5. It makes vague statements about AP classes not specific to the topic, or summarizes old opinion pieces, without providing any useful information.
  6. Sources range from mediocre (local news articles) to abysmal. One of them now links to a spam site.

There is no part of this article that would be worth incorporating into the history article, nor any other article, nor to any future rewrite of this article. Any editor who wishes to write a coverage of this topic, and the relevant points in #4, would be better off expanding History of education in Kentucky#Since 1990. Nicknimh (talk) 01:33, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support deletion. While an article of sufficient notability and quality COULD be written to occupy a similar title: the article that exists is not justified for the aforementioned reasons. SecretName101 (talk) 02:02, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

edit: I will add that Education in Kentucky#Reform has decent coverage of this topic, though it could use an update. Nicknimh (talk) 02:50, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.