The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Albania under the Ottoman Empire with history left intact. The article has interesting sources but is of very limited scope; there is a significant consensus here that it does not belong as a standalone article but good suggestions have been made that it potentially deserves mention in related article(s) and potentially a Wiktionary entry. The history is left available if anyone wishes to do either of those things. ~ mazca ^talk 20:52, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Albanokratia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:NOTABILITY, this entire article can be condensed to more or less a single sentence at Albania under the Ottoman Empire and/or a Wiktionary entry. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 19:10, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 19:10, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albania-related deletion discussions. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 19:10, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• I disagree with Amanuensis Balkanicus. --Albert Falk (talk) 07:48, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Question -- Does the first part of this need to be transwikified to the dictionary as Albanocrat?

No, Peterkingiron, I think it should be transwikified as Albanokratia, which roughly translates to Albanocracy. The rest of the content can be included in Albania under the Ottoman Empire and this article deleted. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 19:54, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree, since it is a term used in 18th century Greece to denounce Albanian leaders in Morea. It is therefore relevant. --Albert Falk (talk) 11:25, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fa alk, Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Historical uses of the term can be added to related articles, but it does not merit an article of its own. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 19:58, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, as Wikipedia is not a dictionary .... an entry in Wictionary though.... Coolabahapple (talk) 12:59, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Transwiki as suggested. Bearian (talk) 23:33, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete WP:NOTDICT Wm335td (talk) 18:27, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.