Speedway

User talk:Prince of Erebor

Happy New Year, Prince of Erebor!

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

𝙳.𝟷𝟾𝚝𝚑 (𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔) 20:17, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot, D.18th! Wishing you a happy and prosperous new year too!!! —Prince of Erebor（The Book of Mazarbul） 12:10, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Papa (2024 film)

On 2 January 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Papa (2024 film), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that multiple scenes in Papa feature cotton-tree flowers, even though it was not scripted and the falling cotton simply kept drifting into the shot? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Papa (2024 film). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Papa (2024 film)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Z1720 (talk) 12:02, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A WAM Barnstar for you!

Wikipedia Asian Month 2024 contest
Prince of Erebor Thank you for your additions in Wikipedia Asian Month 2024. 28 of your articles have been accepted. Warm Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 18:36, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Blossoms Under Somewhere

On 8 January 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Blossoms Under Somewhere, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the director-screenwriter of Blossoms Under Somewhere joined Telegram groups that sell used lingerie to conduct field research? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Blossoms Under Somewhere. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Blossoms Under Somewhere), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 12:04, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Witch (TV series)

I went ahead and published The Witch (TV series) to avoid any further delay. So I hope you don't consider this rude. I wouldn't be offended if someone did similar to a draft I marked for review for similar technical reasons. 𝙳.𝟷𝟾𝚝𝚑 (𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔) 23:39, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Need Help With An Article

Hi Prince Erebor, I hope you’re doing well. I really appreciate the review you wrote on the article I submitted. From your feedback, it seems the main issue with the article is the references I’ve included. Most of the sources I was able to find relevant to the subject are from Baidu Baike. I’ll work on finding more reliable and diverse sources to improve the article. I would truly appreciate your assistance and guidance in making it strong enough for publication. Thank you so much for your time and support! CHIBEZA17 (talk) 10:13, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hey CHIBEZA17, that is right. Most of the sources currently in the draft are either primary sources related to the awards or companies associated with the topic, or they come from Baidu Baike, which is not a reliable source. You might try looking for news articles or book coverage on the subject. Feel free to reach out to me here once you have completed the rewrite. I would be happy to take a look. —Prince of Erebor（The Book of Mazarbul） 16:24, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Hey Prince of Erebor, i have made the edits to the article, if you have the time you can review the draft. will very much appreciate your feedback. CHIBEZA17 (talk) 13:25, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Hi CHIBEZA17, I took a look at the first ten sources of the article, and I do not believe the issues with the previous nomination have been resolved. All sources except for source 2 focus on Duan's company or the awards she received, with minimal mention of her, while Source 2 is an WP:INTERVIEW. Besides, much of the article is unsourced. (Please see WP:INLINE) If these are the best media coverage available for the subject, I am concerned that she may not have enough notability for a Wikipedia article at this time. —Prince of Erebor（The Book of Mazarbul） 14:03, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

The Chinese Barnstar
For the great dedication made towards Chinese-related articles, I am much impressed by your efforts. Thank you. Ilovefood123123 (talk) 14:38, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The Article Rescue Barnstar
For preventing the deletion of Hong Nga Court by finding related sources and proving its notability. Thank you. Ilovefood123123 (talk) 14:38, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Miss Shampoo

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Miss Shampoo you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kusma -- Kusma (talk) 09:24, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Miss Shampoo

The article Miss Shampoo you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Miss Shampoo for comments about the article, and Talk:Miss Shampoo/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kusma -- Kusma (talk) 18:43, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for your detailed review of the article, Kusma! Regarding Story in Taipei, I know it is Oscar Chiu's debut role, but actually I only wrote the article for him while getting rid of red links for The Lyricist Wannabe. I have not watched the film yet, so I am certainly not confident in writing about it at this point. I may watch it when I have the time, and if I enjoy it, I will definitely do my best to expand on it! Cheers!! —Prince of Erebor（The Book of Mazarbul） 19:33, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Last Song for You

On 22 January 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Last Song for You, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that lead actor Ian Chan also composed, arranged, and performed the interlude for Last Song for You? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Last Song for You. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Last Song for You), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—Kusma (talk) 00:03, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Nana (entertainer, born 2001)

Could you please review this: Draft:Nana (entertainer, born 2001) Btspurplegalaxy 💬 🖊️ 07:46, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Btspurplegalaxy, I believe this is the first time we have a conversation, so nice to meet you! I reviewed the article and have some reservations about whether the subject currently has enough individual notability for a standalone article. She has not made her solo debut, and her appearances on television shows like Queendom Puzzle are alongside her groupmates, which does not demonstrate sufficient individual notability. I know she has appeared in a couple of web series, but none of those have standalone articles at this time, which might suggest only a very marginal pass on notability. But since she has not made any additional appearances since the article's AFD in September 2024, which resulted in a redirect, and given that the consensus during that discussion was that her appearances were still insufficient for individual notability, I am afraid there are not enough new individual activities to override that conclusion just yet. I would be happy to accept the draft if she releases a solo single or appears in a few more notable TV series individually in the near future! Cheers and happy editing! —Prince of Erebor（The Book of Mazarbul） 08:22, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for taking the time to review it—I really appreciate your feedback. I'll see what I can do with the draft moving forward, considering that Nana isn't currently engaged in solo activities. Btspurplegalaxy 💬 🖊️ 23:16, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You are welcome, Btspurplegalaxy! I appreciate the effort you have put into this article too (as well as so many other K-pop articles). It is definitely not about your editing; the issue is with notability that traps the article in draftspace. In the meantime, perhaps we can sit back and wait for Nana to advance her own career to a point where she achieves sufficient individual notability. Cheers! —Prince of Erebor（The Book of Mazarbul） 14:05, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in the January 2025 GAN backlog drive

The Minor Barnstar
Your noteworthy contribution (4 points total) helped reduce the backlog by 185 articles! Here's a token of our appreciation. IntentionallyDense (Contribs) 04:44, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Renaming an article

Hello Prince of Erebor, thank you for taking a look at and editing the article for Isaac Hong. I was just enquiring about the rename from Isaac Hong to Hong Isaac. While I understand that in traditional Korean names the family name comes first, Isaac is considered an overseas Korean meaning he follows the last name system wherein his given name comes first. This is reflected across his social media and professional platforms. While his name when written in Korean does have the family name coming first, written in English it is always Isaac Hong. Thus, I believe it would be most accurate to write his name in English as Isaac Hong and his name in Korean as 홍이삭 (Hong Isaac). I was hoping to get your thoughts on this matter as you made the initial change. Thank you again for your work on the article! TheAnnaBanana (talk) 11:05, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello TheAnnaBanana!! This is a very well-composed article, and I have only made some minor edits, so you deserve the full credit for writing it and I really appreciate your work! I renamed the article in accordance with WP:COMMONNAME, which states that article titles should choose the name most commonly used by reliable sources. (it generally prefers the name that is most commonly used (as determined by its prevalence in a significant majority of independent, reliable, English-language sources) From what I gathered in the article and through a search on Google News, it seems that most sources use the surname-name order "Hong Isaac", including reputable South Korean outlets like The Korea Times[1], JoongAng Daily[2], and Maeil Business Newspaper[3].
In my review of the first five pages of results for "Isaac Hong" on Google News, I found that most either still used "Hong Isaac" or came from unreliable sources, with no English reliable sources using "Isaac Hong". Please correct me if I am wrong, but it appears that the subject's Instagram account also follows the surname-name order. (I believe this is Hong's official account[4].) While I noticed a couple of sources you included use "Isaac Hong" (like Halsug and Hype), and it is true that Hong's YouTube channel uses that name, they seem to be among the few supporting this naming order. So I use "Hong Isaac" as the article's title while moving it into mainspace, both for Wikipedia policies and for searchability (it would be much easier for someone to find this page if they encounter "Hong Isaac" in the news or on social media). But I may be mistaken and could have overlooked some sources, so please feel free to share your thoughts if you disagree with me. —Prince of Erebor（The Book of Mazarbul） 12:45, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Prince of Erebor, thank you for your comments! I am still quite new to editing and writing articles according to Wikipedia's practices, so thank you for clarifying. I also re-reviewed various sites and sources, and you are right it seems that while it tends to alternate the strongest sources use "Hong Isaac". What brought this to my attention was the artist's newest release of the single "Lovers" (which he has been promoting under "Isaac Hong"). But in all honestly if even the artist themselves is alternating, it probably is best to just go with what the bigger media outlets address him by. Thank you again for all your advice and help!!! TheAnnaBanana (talk) 21:27, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No worries, TheAnnaBanana! Yea, sometimes there are discrepancies in how a person's name is spelled or ordered. The article's title is usually chosen based on the naming conventions of the country (in this case, it would be Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Korean)) or the name most commonly used in reliable sources. If you encounter the same query in the future, consider checking how the person is most frequently referenced in news articles. Great job on the article and I look forward to more excellent contributions from you! Happy editing! —Prince of Erebor（The Book of Mazarbul） 11:22, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the Draft Draft:Atom Eve (character)

I appreciate your time and feedback on my draft. I have addressed the concerns you raised and made the necessary improvements. Additionally, I have added more information to enhance the article's verifiability. Could you kindly review the draft again to see if it now meets Wikipedia’s guidelines? I’d appreciate any further suggestions you might have. Afro 📢Talk! 09:36, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Afrowriter! I just checked the article, and the previously unsourced content has indeed been added with citations. Great job! However, I am still not convinced about the real-world notability demonstrated in the reception section. Most reviews, like those from Shacknews and Collider, seem to focus on the video game or TV series rather than the character itself. It appears that only the CBR article specifically discuss the character. However, a recent RFC discussion has labeled their articles as churnalism, which means they can be used to flesh out the article, but are unlikely to be taken into account for notability. I suggest continuing to search for more sources that specifically address the character. If the ones currently in the article are the best available, I regret to say that the subject may not have enough notability for a standalone article at this point. ——👑PRINCE of EREBOR📜 10:34, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The Shark News and Collider discussed both the game and TV series, as well as the character. Nowadays, it's rare to come across articles that focus solely on a fictional character. Afro 📢Talk! 11:05, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Together with the CBR source, that should be sufficient. She has been the subject of numerous discussions and is a well-known character in the Invincible universe. This character has clearly passed GNG and SIGCOV, which alone should be enough to support her notability claim.
don't get me wrong am not trying to argue with you am just saying you cant dismiss the case that she (The Character Atom Eve)
Has been a case of many Non trivial publications not just mentions Afro 📢Talk! 11:11, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Afrowriter: Yea, sources that discuss a fictional character in isolation are rare, which is why fictional biographies are usually harder to create. I do not believe there is any ambiguity regarding the Shacknews and Collider sources, that they primarily focus on the fictional works with the character being mentioned only in passing throughout the reviews. And as I mentioned, CBR has already been discredited and should not be considered in terms of notability at all. (See WP:VALNET) The three best sources currently in the article are either trivial or unreliable, so I do not find it convincing that the article meets GNG at this point and I doubt it would survive an AFD. Agree to disagree, I will pass this review on to another reviewer to see if there is a third opinion that aligns with yours. ——👑PRINCE of EREBOR📜 11:53, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for The Prosecutor

On 27 February 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Prosecutor, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the production design team for The Prosecutor was entirely female? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Prosecutor. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, The Prosecutor), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 12:03, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quelle: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Prince_of_Erebor