Speedway

User talk:Malcolmxl5

Tech News: 2025-05

Extended content

MediaWiki message delivery 22:12, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - February 2025

Delivered February 2025 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.

11:46, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

Question.

I am the one who nominated the Draft of a name I have forgot for deletion (you can find a contribution about it in my contributions page). What was the name of it, because the page creation has been wiped from the contributions of the IP (71.17.196.25 i believe?). 71.78.136.213 (talk) 19:37, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page a couple of days ago. — Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:48, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2025-06

Extended content

MediaWiki message delivery 00:06, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – February 2025

Extended content

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2025).

Administrator changes

readded
  • Arcticocean
  • Wugapodes
removed Euryalus

CheckUser changes

removed
  • Firefly
  • L235

Oversighter changes

removed
  • Firefly
  • Guerillero
  • L235
  • Moneytrees

Technical news

  • Administrators can now nuke pages created by a user or IP address from the last 90 days, up from the initial 30 days. T380846
  • A 'Recreated' tag will now be added to pages that were created with the same title as a page which was previously deleted and it can be used as a filter in Special:RecentChanges and Special:NewPages. T56145

Arbitration

  • The arbitration case Palestine-Israel articles 5 has been closed.

Concerning Sinfest

Hello there. I wanted to talk about the Sinfest situation in more detail. As you said before that brief RfC closed: "find high-quality sources and summarise what they say." While that's certainly true, polite and said in good faith, I think the complainers already understood that would be the best option, they just didn't think it would be possible. I'm inclined to agree with them.

I don't know how familiar you are with writing about webcomics, so I hope you don't mind if I gab the scenic route. It's a real bother. While there are plenty of readers, with one hosting platform pulling in tens of millions of readers alone, webcomics are very poorly positioned to produce the kind of sources we can use. They're overwhelmingly hobbyist, "a person, a tablet, and a dream" affairs. That doesn't draw in reporters for a webcomic beat, the way there's a book beat or a comics beat. A webcomic's very successful if it can support its artist, so they don't get the kind of dollars or commercialization that get attention. There hasn't been the time or cash flow for respectable, well-established publishers. There's little academic interest. In short, waiting for a cite from something like the New York Times is a bad idea. Sourcing webcomics is more of a scrounging act. "We found statements from two noted cartoonists and a newspaper article going "Local artist does something on Internet, computers confuse us but good on them I guess.""

This might be easier if we had a body of editors experienced in where to look and how, and their notes - you know, institutional knowledge - but the webcomic wikiproject was killed after - and bitterness may be coloring my memories here - a small number of editors devastated our coverage of the topic, using AfD as a first resort, making no effort to improve articles or look for sources, re-nominating and re-re-nominating the same articles for deletion as many times as it took to get a "delete", and even if you made the grueling scavenger hunt to find sources for an article that would probably be deleted regardless, you wouldn't have the time or energy to do the same for the other nineteen they AfD'd blithely at the same time. You can understand why that'd be bad for morale.

You especially won't find articles going "Webcomic respected long time ago spouts Nazi stances." Why would people write those? There's rather a lot of very disagreeable things on the Internet. Keeping track of it wouldn't be possible or sane, and charting its history is perhaps of interest to students of radicalization and history professors, who are thin on the ground with webcomics. But since notability's not temporary, we can end up in a situation where all we have are good, reasonable, old sources about what a webcomic was that are wholly inaccurate about what a webcomic is.

Which brings us to the business at hand.

Sinfest was wacky, irreverent gag-a-day comedy. Then it was earnest feminism. In the last couple of months it's depicted Jews poisoning wells, sacrificing babies and draining their blood, and a Jew being killed in an on-panel lynching as a righteous act. A quote:

"What's the password?
"Kill all the goyim. Smash their idols. Burn their statues. Annihilate them from memory."
"Shalom."

I don't mean to say the Sinfest of today is that bad. I mean to say it's much worse. I've left out the things someone might contest, such as the council of the "Learned Elders of Zion" being a reference to The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, Yahweh being drawn as The Happy Merchant, and his "We are eternal" line being another reference, and the things from further back such as how the camps and Hitler being evil were propaganda and the real victim was Germany and the real perpetrator the Jews, or the perfidy of the Jewish financiers and media in the Weimar Republic.

To my feeble understanding, the complainers' argument is that having an encyclopedia article that presents what Sinfest has become as what it once was is inaccurate - worse, it's deceptive. People who oppose covering what it is without secondary sources argue that it's accepted that Wikipedia is a work in progress, but what are we supposed to do, wait thirty years until the 200-hour adaptation of Homestuck takes the world by storm and the field gets enough interest for someone to compile The History of Webcomics, 1985-2007?

I'm sympathetic to the complainers on this, and would invoke IAR if I thought it had a snowball's chance. Do you have any angles on tackling this mess? For instance, would you happen to know if it'd be appropriate to use that "What's the password?" panel as the illustration for the article? --Kizor 19:38, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Shruthi swarup

Thanks for your rangeblock and mass deletion of the "Shruthi swarup" edits - we'll see what happens in 72 hours (if not sooner) - thanks again - Arjayay (talk) 12:05, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The nature of those edits was a bit unexpected! Hopefully, they will move on. — Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:22, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2025-07

Extended content

MediaWiki message delivery 00:09, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

Precious
Seven years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:49, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

211.36.142

Hi, thanks for blocking the IPs, but this person is using new IPs as you perform a block. Please range-block 211.36.142. See 211.36.142.34 filter logs. Jerium (talk) 16:36, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A rangeblock is in place. — Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:42, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2025-08

Hello!

Would you mind doing a rev/del on [25] please? Thanks in advance, Knitsey (talk) 18:31, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. No problem. — Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:34, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much. Knitsey (talk) 18:39, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2025-09

Extended content

MediaWiki message delivery 00:38, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

U.S. Route 97 in California

Hello, I think you might have mistakenly undone one of my edits to this page where I mass rollbacked that IP hopper. It was supposed to be the year 1935. Can you please check this again? Thanks. User3749 (talk) 18:21, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that was a mistake, I probably misclicked when looking at the IPs contributions. I’ve rollbacked my edit. Thanks for letting me know. — Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:26, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]