• 50.225.226.252 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 384 five times in the last 5 minutes (Addition of bad words or other vandalism, details). . DatBot (talk) 19:03, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

  Warned user. Level 3 now, which really should be the last warning given that this IP was blocked for this sort of thing a year ago. Daniel Case (talk) 19:12, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

• 66.220.208.68 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). . DatBot (talk) 21:01, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
• 183.82.160.115 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1344 (Excessive blank lines, details). . DatBot (talk) 21:09, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
• 5.116.135.52 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). . DatBot (talk) 21:34, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

• Zaydlol77 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. Signs of NOTHERE behavior and an interest in creating articles about themselves with no notability established. GSK (talk • edits) 22:16, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

  Page deleted. Talk:Zayd Ahmed

  User has been incorrectly or insufficiently warned. Re-report if the user resumes vandalising after being warned sufficiently. Peaceray (talk) 23:45, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

• Woo Kidd (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – account is being used only for promotional purposes. Free webhosting client. DBaK (talk) 22:13, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

  Page deleted. by Widr.

  Warned user. with {{uw-coi}}. Peaceray (talk) 23:35, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

• Mku kaden (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Vandalism at Timeline of crimes involving the Order of Nine Angles, involving the Maniac Murder Cult (MKU). Note username, edit here claims it is MY GROUP. MKU is identified as a terrorist group. User is clearly WP:NOTHERE. — The Hand That Feeds You:^Bite 23:41, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
• Xin Ming Zhu 19 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On Draft:黎進 Lai Chun Sean: actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. Also check cross-wiki vandal on Chinese Wikipedia.  Looks like a duck to me the same person as Xin Ming Zhu 39 (talk · contribs). Probably GBB-ed user. 1F616EMO (talk) 00:13, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
• 2604:3D08:187C:9600:30CD:366C:F694:3564 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Vandalism after final warning. /etc/owuh $ (💬 | she/her) 00:31, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
• ÇiraTVMuratÇINAR (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. talk page vandalism. /etc/owuh $ (💬 | she/her) 00:41, 1 March 2025 (UTC)

  Possible LTA based on username similarity to Special:CentralAuth/42.200Dengê Çira Şengalê (Non-administrator comment) /etc/owuh $ (💬 | she/her) 00:43, 1 March 2025 (UTC)

{{CSD backlogs}} 7 backlognav + 2 + 5 single cat

Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 1 item

Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 9 items

Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old – 1 item

Requested RD1 redactions – 1 item

Expired proposed deletions of unsourced BLPs – No backlog currently

• Antiracistfactchecker (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  This username matched "rac(ial)?(ism|ist)" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 11:40, 26 February 2025 (UTC)

   Note on file Accusations of racism may constitute a personal attack -- DQB (owner / report) 11:40, 26 February 2025 (UTC)

• Limecuck (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  This username matched "cuck" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 16:20, 26 February 2025 (UTC)

   Note on file abbreviation of "cuckold" -- DQB (owner / report) 16:20, 26 February 2025 (UTC)

• Bot9339838 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  This username matched "bot ?[0-9]*$" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 14:50, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

   Note on file Name may imply an unauthorized bot. Do not block accounts in which the "bot" suffix arises naturally -- DQB (owner / report) 14:50, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

• MediocreDudeWhoIsGenerallyPrettyBoring (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 21:50, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

  This username matched "long username without spaces" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 21:50, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

• Pukebrain (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 04:10, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

  This username matched "puke" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 04:10, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

• UchihaItachiMangekyoSharingan (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 07:40, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

  This username matched "long username without spaces" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 07:40, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

• Yad Yid Yed (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  This username matched "\b(yid)s?\b" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 07:50, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

• Angel-gabriels-blessedartthoughamongwomen-syringe (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 19:40, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

  This username matched "long username without spaces" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 19:40, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

• Moshit1 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  This username matched "shit" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 20:10, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

   Note on file Please note that many names contain the string "shit" especially names from India - be careful that this is not the case before blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 20:10, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

• ESystems Nordic (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) WP:CORPNAME Hyphenation Expert (talk) 07:38, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

  They've not yet promoted anything. Secretlondon (talk) 08:38, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

• WikepediaEdits (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a misleading username. The C of E God Save the King! (talk) 13:03, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

  Maybe their name is Wike? I'm not sure what this could be confused with. Secretlondon (talk) 20:10, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

  Secretlondon I think the "misleading" aspect is that it could be confused for an "official" account. I'm not sure I agree, but I think that's the rationale. 331dot (talk) 21:17, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

  I don't think we'd have an official account called Wikipedia Edits, and I think it would be okay if someone had that as a name. Secretlondon (talk) 08:06, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

  Not a blatant violation of the username policy. Agreed with Secretlondon. Mz7 (talk) 08:23, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

  It wouldn't be OK. Wikipedia is on the global title blacklist. Cabayi (talk) 08:37, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

  Perhaps this should go to WP:RFCN. 331dot (talk) 09:21, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

  I would support that @331dot:. The C of E God Save the King! (talk) 14:21, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

• Dynisious Frame (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 11:35, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

  This appears to be his name, which is allowed. The spammy sandbox was correctly deleted. If he re-posts it, then a block could be applied, for now I don't think we have to do anything. PhilKnight (talk) 17:27, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

• Pallab Rajbonshii (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. / RemoveRedSky ^{[talk] [gb]} 17:24, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

  An edit they've made promotes themselves. / RemoveRedSky ^{[talk] [gb]} 17:25, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

This isn't a username issue as they are allowed to use their real name. They could be blocked for promotion, especially if they re-post the link. PhilKnight (talk) 17:32, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

Yeah, that's what I thought. Wasn't sure if I should've reported them due to their promotion, but I did regardless. / RemoveRedSky ^{[talk] [gb]} 17:33, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

• DarkXWolf17(bite me) (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as an offensive and disruptive username. "Bite me" does not assume good faith and can be perceived as disruptive. Edits seem normal, otherwise. GSK (talk • edits) 18:30, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

  Their username is a reference to an animated web series. Probably not a violation. (Non-administrator comment) / RemoveRedSky ^{[talk] [gb]} 18:33, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

• Bha. Bha. Ba. (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing – repeatedly adding cast additions without any proper citation. Killeri Achu (talk) 08:25, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 20:56, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

• List of Indian state emblems (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Persistent IP attempts to add a non-free West Bengal emblem. Also one attempt from a registered account. Declangi (talk) 11:14, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 2409:4080:BE00:0:0:0:0:0/40 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 21:08, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

Left CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 21:09, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

• Little Princess (British TV series) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Persistent vandalism by multiple IP addresses Dipper Dalmatian (talk) 12:07, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

• Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:09, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

• World Tag Team Championship (WWE) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP hopping user. — Czello ^(music) 14:56, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 143.44.184.177 (talk · contribs) blocked by EvergreenFir. for six months. Daniel Case (talk) 21:27, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

• Hafsa Sultan (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Plz add protection in Hafsa Sultan in simple english wikipedia for vandalism Fatiso786 (talk) 16:06, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

Declined We don't handle requests for any other wikipedia but this one. Daniel Case (talk) 22:16, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

• Adolf (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Also a high-risk page. It is unlikely that the vandalism would stop after protection ends. RaschenTechner (talk) 16:56, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. I would also note that this page hasn't been edited at all in 17 days, which is also contrary to your prediction since it hasn't been protected in almost 10 years. Daniel Case (talk) 22:19, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

• Gladstone Institutes (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Extended-confirmed protection - Non-EC editors having a dispute on a topic related to antisemitism. Departure– (talk) 16:57, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No one's used the talk page yet, it seems, since someone opened a discussion about this (it seems) eight days ago. Daniel Case (talk) 22:22, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

• Amal Saad-Ghorayeb (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Arab-Israeli conflict. Tarlby ^{(t) (c)} 18:52, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. And not enough of a nexus with the present conflict. Daniel Case (talk) 22:38, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

• 2012 Cyprus terrorist plot (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Arab-Israeli conflict. Tarlby ^{(t) (c)} 18:57, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. And not really primary to the current conflict. Daniel Case (talk) 22:43, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

• Bazma (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent hijacking by temporarily blocked editor. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:42, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: Luna pence (talk · contribs) blocked by Spencer. for 31 hours. See if they've learned the lesson when they come back. Daniel Case (talk) 22:59, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Ymblanter (talk) 23:02, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

• Template:Https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lydia Canaan

Reason:Requesting full protection, the article is repeatedly being vandalized by new accounts. Thomasvitins (talk) 21:47, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

• Automated comment: @Thomasvitins: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:59, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

  Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. I have warned them, which hadn't been done yet. If this returns, consider asking an admin there to look at the 76.133.128.0/17 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · block user · block log) range. Daniel Case (talk) 23:07, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

• LGBTQ music (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite semi-protection: Contentious topic restriction. LGBTQ contentious topic, semi-protection is usually applied on such pages RaschenTechner (talk) 22:31, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 23:11, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

• Republican Party (United States) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Contentious topic restriction. Is related to post-1992 politics of the United States. It's also the ruling party. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk • contribs) 22:44, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

• I don't see why. It's already semi-protected. I don't see obvious evidence of vandalism or disruption. Wikipedia doesn't have a ruling party. Drmies (talk) 22:47, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
  • What I meant by ruling party was to the United States. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk • contribs) 22:48, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
    • Ah. That's not a reason for raising protection levels. Drmies (talk) 22:51, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

      Declined per above. Daniel Case (talk) 23:28, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

• Tampa Bay (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Gulf of America. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 22:49, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

• Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. user:Leonidlednev I'm not convinced that's necessary yet. I did block that IP after looking at the filter log. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 22:51, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

• Save Our Children (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Contentious topic restriction. Post-1992 US politics ctop RaschenTechner (talk) 22:55, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 23:30, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

• Wikimedia Incubator (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Keeps being reconverted into an article when the consensus currently is to maintain a redirect to the WMF article. Aydoh8^[contribs] 23:34, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The last edit before this was three years ago. Daniel Case (talk) 23:43, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

• 2025 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: High traffic, important page. Occasional vandalism too. Wildfireupdateman :) (talk) 00:13, 1 March 2025 (UTC)

• Everything (tour) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA. 🌙Eclipse (she/they/all neos • talk • edits) 00:34, 1 March 2025 (UTC)

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

• To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
• Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
• Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
• If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.

Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

• Roman numerals (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: They need this page editable. Tust0000 (talk) 13:44, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) "They"? Also, you have not contacted the protecting admin (if still active, and they are) prior to requesting here as required by the rules stated in yellow above. Materialscientist has not been notified. Zinnober9 (talk) 15:05, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

• Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:12, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

  Declined Per above. Daniel Case (talk) 21:28, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

• Idea for having Trump's tariffs removed (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: I want this article to reach the largest number of people quickly and before the tariffs are started Lpanico2 (talk) 23:42, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

Declined This is a page creation request, and not an edit. I would tell you go to AfC but, honestly, don't waste your time. We are so not the publisher of first instance. Daniel Case (talk) 23:44, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

• Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
• Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
• Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
• If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
• This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.

• Kendrick Lamar (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Kendricks personal life tab was recently edited. The last person to edit was Saloni Jain22 as of now (5 hours ago). The incorrect information is under his personal life tab. "In an October 2012 interview, he stated that he once tried marijuana, but the blunt was laced with PCP". The drug last started is incorrect and should be replaced with "angel dust" or more commonly known as, cocaine. The link that is attached is a YouTube video with kendrick literally stating verbatim. he has also referenced this is two songs on his GOOD Kid MAAD city album. Once at the end of "Peer Pressure" and again in m.a.a.d city he refers to it making him "foam at the mouth". You're welcome 2601:98D:C182:7000:6040:86B0:1916:8063 (talk) 22:04, 25 February 2025 (UTC)

 Note: PCP is angel dust. Worgisbor (Talking's fun!) 22:42, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

• Tanishk Nagayach (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

TanishkNagayachhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:TanishkNagayach TanishkNagayach (talk) 09:26, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

Declined Again, this is a page creation request, not an edit request. Daniel Case (talk) 23:47, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

• C1K98V (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

Hello, I have created 75+ articles, since I got autopatrolled mostly focusing on television series. For transparency, I'm still working on the feedback received from @Schwede66 in my last request. And I intent to keep doing the good work. Thanks for your consideration. Wishing the community a prosperous new year. C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 06:56, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary autopatrolled rights by Schwede66 (expires 00:00, 23 January 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBot ^talk 07:01, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Could you please point to where the date of birth of Gautam Vig is referenced, C1K98V? Schwede66 08:14, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Hi @Schwede66, I hope you enjoyed your vacation. I have sourced the DOB in the early life section as per WP:INFOBOXREF. I followed the editing style of Geniac, the way he improved Sheezan Khan and tried adapting the same. Thanks C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 08:48, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Thanks, I had a fab wee holiday. I don't understand your answer. I see that there is one ref in the infobox, and that reference does confirm the date of birth, but it is attached to the spouse only. Could you please explain what you mean, and how the referencing confirms the date of birth, C1K98V? Schwede66 08:59, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Schwede66 In the above mentioned article I have sourced the date of birth in the Early life section, see here. And the spouse's source is just about their marriage. I'm following the editing style of Geniac, the improvement he did in one of my previously created article see here. Thanks C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 09:38, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Sorry, which reference states the date of Vig's date of birth? I cannot see it. Schwede66 18:29, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Schwede66, I have used two sources for DOB, Colors TV and India Today. You can find both the sources in the Early life section. Hope it helps, if you still can't verify the birth date, you're most welcome to remove it. Thanks C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 18:50, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

@C1K98V Is it just me or the webpage you're linking to from colorstv.com is redirecting to a /mena/ directory making it impossible to see what you're talking about or citing. As for the indiatoday.in, you did not initially position the citation as of when Schwede66 started reviewing your request, you only repositioned the citation today. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 19:07, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Hi Vanderwaalforces, I'm not sure if the Colorstv website works outside of India. Let's wait for Schwede66 to confirm if they're able to verify it. I'm sharing a screenshot of the website for reference [1]. While searching for sources related to their academics, I found IndiaToday and added it later in the Early life section. I repositioned the named citation as I wanted to highlight it for Schwede66, so I left an edit summary too. Thanks for your consideration. C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 03:43, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) I can access the colorstv source and confirm that it mentions Gautam Vig's date of birth. – DreamRimmer (talk) 12:18, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

That's good to know, because I have the same problem that Vanderwaalforces talks about. I will have to get back to this item. Schwede66 07:44, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

• Walco1 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

Concise, well-written and sufficiently articles, mostly with a royal or Church of England focus. I looked at an articles of theirs as part of NPP, and found it to be up to standard without editing. Others look reasonable too. Klbrain (talk) 12:15, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

• GanzKnusper (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

91 main space articles, 45 rated above stub, no deletions. I mostly create articles for albums or BLPs of musicians. GanzKnusper (talk) 09:26, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

• AlphaBetaGamma (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

I know my first articles are... bad, but my recent pages, Yumeshima Station, Meitetsu KiHa 10 series, Meitetsu 3400 series, and Resignation services should be good without being patrolled. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 03:11, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

• AmateurHi$torian (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

The user has created 189 articles, and only two have ever been deleted—with one later restored. They have a strong understanding of reliable sources (WP:RS) and are well-versed in BLP policies (WP:BLP). I've reviewed one or two of their articles, and I believe they truly deserve the rights. Baqi:) (talk) 13:03, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

@Jannatulbaqi: Thanks for considering me :) -AmateurHi$torian (talk) 15:39, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

+1 Good quality and appropriately sourced articles. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 08:35, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

• Paradoxodarap (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

Hello, I would like to request AutoPatrolled rights. I have been actively contributing to Wikipedia since December 2020, with over 1,090 total edits (945 live edits) and 154 articles created (121 currently live).

Reasons for requesting AutoPatrolled rights:

• Experience in article creation: I have created numerous articles that meet Wikipedia’s notability, verifiability, and neutrality guidelines.
• Understanding of Wikipedia policies: As an Extended Confirmed User, I follow Wikipedia’s Manual of Style, Cite Sources, and Notability Guidelines.
• Reducing admin workload: Granting AutoPatrolled rights would help reduce the backlog for New Page Patrollers, as my articles generally do not require manual review.
• Clean track record: I have never been blocked and maintain a history of constructive contributions.

I appreciate your time and consideration. Thank you! bɑʁɑqoxodaraP (talk) 10:36, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

• VortexPhantom (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

*Request for Auto-Patrolled Rights*

Dear Wikipedia Administrators,

I am requesting *auto-patrolled rights* to streamline my contributions. Over the past month, I have actively edited Wikipedia, focusing on *Politics, Infrastructure, and Technology in India*.

With 100+ constructive edits, I have developed a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s policies and formatting. Granting me *autopatrolled status* will help improve efficiency by reducing manual reviews. As there are not any specific requirements for autopatrolled right, I think I am suitable for this right.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Best regards, VortexPhantom (talk) 11:17, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

 Not done. User:VortexPhantom The expectation is to have created 25 articles without any significant problems for autopatrolled, which you are quite far from at the moment. Please ensure you read the requirements before requesting permissions. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 11:39, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

I didn't saw that before, thanks, not be repeated next time. VortexPhantom (talk) 11:41, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

• MaplesyrupSushi (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

Great editor, with high quality articles.Has written 32 live articles. Xiphoid Vigour ⚔Duel⚔ 15:22, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

• Hwqaksd (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

I have created 90 articles, of which 81 are above stub-class and none deleted (to my recollection).

I was previously denied autopatrolled permissions for not having enough articles that didn't go through AfC; I've since created 14 articles without utilizing it. Hwqaksd (talk) 18:39, 27 February 2025 (UTC) Hwqaksd (talk) 18:39, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

• Czerniawskimc (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

Reason for requesting confirmed rights: I will need the rights so I can attempt to make changes in semi-protected articles and I think my situation is a little different. After many years of use without contribution I've decided to contribute and take care of some outdated images and animations (I'm a 2D/3D Generalist). I do not plan to edit any other content, including text - unless it's necessary for some reason, like a description that has to be updated. I plan to start with English articles first, even though it's not my native language. I will just take care of the pictures, but I would have to make 10 of them, according to the rules I've read, and if the YouTube video I watched on the subject is right, I would have to do it in a quick succession (7 days according to "Wikipedia Basics" - "The Boring Voice" channel). It's not possible for me, I'm sorry. The plan is to take care of the most popular articles, but with very outdated images. They are stuck there because there are no free-to-use alternatives or nobody cares enough to update them. I would like to replace them with custom made images released for free for everyone via Wikimedia. I'm somewhat familiar with copyright laws and I understand some of the updates might not be welcome or rejected and that's okay. Images will still be available on Wikimedia in multiple sizes, formats and versions - depending on what is being done. Then I can try updating something else, but I need to be sure I'm somewhat ready to start and have a green light. I don't want to worry if what I'm working on is going to be rejected by an automated message. I also don't want to feel like I cheat and force myself to make 10 careless updates. I will get burnt out. I understand it's also a learning process and proof that someone understands the basics of coding, formatting and is not malicious (at least not yet), but I will do my best to research and test things before making any changes. Creating 3D renders takes time and I will also be limited by my tools and the resources I purchased, all with different licenses. I still have a lot to read and get familiar with, but it's okay. There is time. And I know this account looks fishy and I haven't logged in for 16 years, but the name change ticket went surprisingly well, even though I probably missed a few checkmarks. If for whatever reason this request has to be denied (and I know "the vast majority of requests here are denied" and I know about "WP:FFU"), then it's okay and I will do the next suggested thing ("Template:Edit semi-protected"). I'm happy the wall exists, but unhappy it has to. Thank you for your time. Czerniawskimc (talk) 21:28, 25 February 2025 (UTC)

I think I made a mistake and I was looking at those 10 changes the wrong way. They don't have to be big changes. I think I might have some expertise in certain subjects and I can contribute a little here and there, in unpopular but still outdated articles that don't require any special permissions to edit. Just look at the "3D_rendering" page, it's filled with pictures from 2005 and a lot of information is missing. I will try to contribute something there. I don't know if I can close this ticket, and I'm generally still open to getting "confirmed", but like I mentioned in my previous post - I know I have other solutions and I just realized I can just deal with it and simply follow the rules. I used the word "force" before, but nothing is forced here, nobody is forcing me to do anything and those changes don't have to be "careless", which is another stupid thing I said. Czerniawskimc (talk) 03:34, 26 February 2025 (UTC)

Comment - @Czerniawskimc According to WP:AUTOCONFIRM, it doesn't say anything about the fact that you have to make the edits in "quick succession". Can you link that YouTube video that you talked about? Like you said, this probably will get declined. Justjourney (talk) 01:41, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

Sorry for the confusion. It's a wall of text, and I replied to myself before anyone else could.

It all comes down to what I wrote in my first message: "I will just take care of the pictures, but I would have to make 10 of them, according to the rules I've read, and if the YouTube video I watched on the subject is right, I would have to do it in a quick succession (7 days according to "Wikipedia Basics" - "The Boring Voice" channel)."

After getting familiar with the rules, I knew I had to make 10 edits, and I would have to replace 10 images (based on my previous "image-related contribution scenario"). I also knew there was a possibility that this 7-day time limit exists if the video I mentioned is correct. Just like you, I didn’t notice it mentioned on WP:AUTOCONFIRM, so I was skeptical. Since you asked for the link, I will go ahead and assume it's okay to post it. And I just noticed I can't post a timestamped link, so I suggest skipping to 0min25sec and here is the URL: (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NfR9gAMZzzM).

If this gets declined, it's alright. I just made my first edit ever a few minutes ago, in text, and it was rather bold. Whole new lead section on path tracing with respect to some of the previous content. But the images are on the way - I even got one of the top CGI artists in the world involved and he agreed to release a shaderball model for me (us) via Wikimedia Commons so I can alter it, share it and use in many images I plan to create. We were taking care of the consent declaration today. To sum it up, I will probably end up in autoconfirmed group eventually and it's not an obstacle at the moment. It's almost 7am and bright outside, so it's time to go to sleep. Thank you for your time and good night. Czerniawskimc (talk) 06:00, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

@Czerniawskimc: that video appears to be quite wrong. There are two requirements for autoconfirmed:

1. Your account must be at least four days old (you meet this already as your account is years old)
2. You must make a total of 10 edits (you're currently on 7 edits)

These two conditions are independent from each other, so you just need to hit them both. You're nearly there already. On the assumption you reply to this post again and make two {{edit semi-protected}} requests, you'll be there. It's far less onerous than you seem to think. You also mentioned WP:FFU - this is an option for you at the moment without autoconfirmed status, but that should only be used for irreplaceable non-free files. It sounds like you'll be making freely licenced files that you can upload to Wikimedia Commons without autoconfirmed status.

I'll mark this as  Not done for now as you'll likely hit autoconfirmed sooner than you think. stwalkerster (talk) 12:36, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

• Abo Yemen (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

Hello! I meet the basic guidelines for the permission and I think that I have a good history of RM participation and it would be nice to try and help out with something new. I don't have much to say in my head but feel free to ask questions! 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 19:00, 24 February 2025 (UTC)

• Vellutis (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

I'm well familiar with Wikipedia policies. And in my spare time I am always on duty to combat any vandalism or violation of Wikipedia policies. This right will serve me well. Thanks! Vellutis (talk) 18:48, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([2]). — MusikBot ^talk 18:50, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

• Thorn6130 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

I understand pending change policies well, in addition to my knowledge of general Wikipedia editing policy/procedure. I would like to further contribute in this way. Thanks. Peace, Thorn6130✝ (talk, ask questions, dispute) 00:14, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

• AgerJoy (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

I would like to help in Reviewing pending changes as I'm familiar with all the policies and guidelines for RPC and I'm doing constructive edit regularly. AgerJoy 07:10, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

• Xiphoid Vigour (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

Requesting rights to intervene against vandalism. I've been patrolling recent changes & have reviewed a lot of changes. I was declined last time as my account was new. I'm familiar with all the policies of vandalism and pending changes. Regards, Xiphoid Vigour ༈Duel༈ 09:15, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([3]). — MusikBot ^talk 09:20, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

• ScrabbleTiles (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

Hi! I edit Wikipedia quite frequently, particularly fighting against vandalism and I think that if I had this right, it would enable me to be a more helpful and better user. I would like to be able to confirm these requests as I think that it would just be another way for me to be helpful. ScrabbleTiles (talk) 10:40, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

• WormEater13 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

I have been a active contributor to Wikipedia for quite a few months now, actively editing and creating articles related to Texas politicians. I'm also well aware about the Wikipedia policy on vandalism. I see a lot of requests on articles that I edit miscellaneously in my free time, however I don't have the permission. WormEater13 (talk) 22:29, 23 February 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([4]). — MusikBot ^talk 22:30, 23 February 2025 (UTC)

• Royiswariii (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

I am requesting for Pending changes reviewer, I've been familiarized all the guidlines like WP:NPOV, WP:!, WP:OR, WP:VERI and WP:BLP. I have a rollback and using that to fight vandalism in Wikipedia. ROY is WAR Talk! 14:46, 24 February 2025 (UTC)

• Danoniinho (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

I'm requesting Pending Changes Reviewer status so I can help speed up and decrease the number of pending changes to articles. I know the rules about vandalism, verifiability, editing guidelines, and everything else. Danoniinho (talk) 20:55, 24 February 2025 (UTC)

• Svartava (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

I would like to have my rights restored as I am interested in countervandalism and patrolling again. I had myself requested removal at [5]. Thanks. Svartava (talk) 14:32, 26 February 2025 (UTC)

• Paradoxodarap (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

Hello, I would like to request **Pending Changes Reviewer** rights. I have been an active editor since December 2020, with **1,094 total edits** (945 live). In the past year, I have made **345 edits**, primarily contributing to content creation, sourcing, and maintenance. I have created **154 articles** (121 currently live), ensuring compliance with Wikipedia's content guidelines. I am familiar with **WP:VANDALISM, WP:BLP, WP:NPOV,** and other core policies. I aim to help review pending changes on semi-protected pages to ensure accuracy and reliability. Thank you for your time and consideration! bɑʁɑqoxodaraP (talk) 10:42, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

• QalasQalas (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

after 2 years I got alot of editing, wanna test another experience. thanks QalasQalas (talk) 00:15, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

@QalasQalas: what would you use rollback for? —Femke 🐦 (talk) 15:28, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

AntiVandalism as you see this Edit and Edit2 new users vandlized account which why i need roll thanks. QalasQalas (talk) 17:24, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

• Coining (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

There have been too many times when multiple rounds of improper edits/vandalism on pages I follow have required individual reversions, so having the rollback permission would be useful. Coining (talk) 04:09, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

• SportscarFan2004 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

I mainly edit on pages related to sportscar racing, where unregistered users often edit multiple small things (often going against the page consensus at the time) in the span of a few minutes. This role would be particularly useful to be able to rollback these edits at once. I check my watchlist multiple times a day and I am quite active in general. Thanks for your time. SportscarFan2004 (talk) 09:40, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

• Oostpulus (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

I request rollback rights. I need rollback rights to more conveniently eliminate vandalism in English wiki. In addition, I have rollback rights on Russian wiki and I am also actively eliminating cross-wiki vandalism. I have read the rollback policy and am ready to follow it. Oostpulus (talk) 08:35, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has 61 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot ^talk 21:10, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

• Gelasin (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

I've been actively Recent Changes patrolling for a little over three months now. I've read WP:Rollback. I would like to try out Huggle for use in fighting vandalism, and I pledge to follow the rollback guidelines. I recognize that the primary use of rollback is to revert vandalism. Gelasin (talk) 21:29, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

• Parksfan1955 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

Would like to obtain rollback rights to use AntiVandal, as patrolling recent changes traditionally can get unorganized with a massive amount of tabs very quickly. I have been patrolling recent changes for around 2 years. Parksfan1955 (talk) 10:15, 23 February 2025 (UTC)

• YuiFujimoto (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

I am continuously patrolling recent changes and fighting against anti-vandalism. I hope this right and the tools available with the permission will help me to do more anti-vandal work more effectively. I will not abuse this tool and use it civilly and won't do edit warring and 3RR violations. YuiFujimoto (talk) 16:51, 23 February 2025 (UTC)

@YuiFujimoto  Not done for now; you shouldn't be making reverts like Special:Diff/1277207503 without an explanation. Likewise with Special:Diff/1277264503, where you labeled a good-faith edit as vandalism. Elli (talk | contribs) 18:24, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

• E6400 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

I am kindly requesting rollback permissions for myself, in order to revert vandalism using the Huggle tool. E6400 (talk) 14:24, 24 February 2025 (UTC)

• ScrabbleTiles (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

Hi, I requested for this right a few weeks ago, which MusikBot will flag up. The reason I was declined was mainly because I had not met the 200 mainspace edit threshold needed for my application to go through. A concern was also raised about one of my edits, saying that I had jumped to conclusions about an editor a bit quickly and had gone too fast with the warnings. I am now trying to be better at using the warning system more fairly and helpfully and I hope that I have addressed this concern. Most of my edits on Wikipedia have been fighting against vandalism and with this tool, I will be able to fight it more efficiently. ScrabbleTiles (talk) 15:27, 24 February 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([6]). — MusikBot ^talk 17:10, 24 February 2025 (UTC)

• United Blasters (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

I'm requesting rollback rights to enhance my ability to fight vandalism. I Would like to try out AntiVandal tool. I'm active in recent changes, pending changes, and new pages patrol, and I understand rollback is for clear vandalism cases. I'll use it responsibly. Here is my Undo/Revert History : [7] UNITED BLASTERS (talk) 14:05, 25 February 2025 (UTC)

• Cactusisme (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

Hello, I would like to request rollback rights. I have made many reverts using undo and I use SWviewer/Twinkle to revert vandalism (see this to see my reverts). I understand the policies of rollback and have thoroughly read through the rollback policies and guidlines. I hope that I would receive the rights (permenant or for a probation period).— Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ouch} 09:45, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

• Acer-the-Protogen (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

Reason for requesting rollback rights: I spend a good deal of time on RecentChanges, and edit on PC as well as mobile (mostly mobile). RedWarn does not work on mobile, and Twinkle can give me trouble sometimes. As such, I'm requesting rights so that mobile editing is a little easier for me. Thank you! 🙂 (NOTE: Forgot to add that rollback seems to be faster than Twinkle. That would be useful.) (Acer's userpage |what did I do now) 20:23, 28 February 2025 (UTC)