Video game was one of the Video games good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones Date Process Result March 10, 2006 Good article nominee Listed September 10, 2006 Good article reassessment Delisted June 10, 2008 Peer review Reviewed September 2, 2009 Good article nominee Not listed Current status: Delisted good article

This  level-3 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Business High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Computer science Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Computer science, computing, and Internet Cleanup : Computer science articles needing attention Computer science articles needing expert attention Copyedit : Computing Expand : Computer science Infobox : Computer science articles without infoboxes Maintain : Timeline of computing 2020–present Photo : Find pictures for the biographies of computer scientists (see List of computer scientists) Computing articles needing images Stubs : Computer science stubs Unreferenced : WikiProject Computer science/Unreferenced BLPs Project-related : Tag all relevant articles in Category:Computer science and sub-categories with {{WikiProject Computer science}} Computing Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. Finance & Investment Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Games (inactive) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Games, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.GamesWikipedia:WikiProject GamesTemplate:WikiProject GamesGames Human–Computer Interaction (inactive) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human–Computer Interaction, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Human–Computer InteractionWikipedia:WikiProject Human–Computer InteractionTemplate:WikiProject Human–Computer InteractionHuman–Computer Interaction Industrial design Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Industrial design, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Industrial design on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Industrial designWikipedia:WikiProject Industrial designTemplate:WikiProject Industrial designIndustrial design Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. Internet culture Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Internet culture To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles Expand : Pick an article from here or here Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images Stubs : All stubs are located here Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}} See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention Media Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Media To-do List: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Cleanup : Media influence, Video game culture, Sound bite NPOV : Content (media and publishing) Verify : Multimedia, Alternative media, Alternative newspaper Other : Answer requests for comments Popular culture (inactive) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Popular culture, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Popular cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Popular cultureTemplate:WikiProject Popular culturePopular culture Software: Computing Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Computing. Systems: Software engineering Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Systems, which collaborates on articles related to systems and systems science.SystemsWikipedia:WikiProject SystemsTemplate:WikiProject SystemsSystems Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is within the field of Software engineering. Technology This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology Video games Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Is "computer game" really synonymous with "video game" as these two words are treated in this article? I ask because according to the first sentence in the lead section of the article "PC game", "computer game" is a synonym for this word.-- Maxeto0910 (talk) 19:50, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As this article states "Computer game" may also be used to describe video games because all video games essentially require a computer processor, though the term typically is reserved for games played primarily on personal computers." - We're not saying that computer game is fully synonymous with "video game", just that it may be used in some cases. --Masem (t) 19:56, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That statement is North American-centric; in other English-speaking parts of the world, "computer game" usually means any kind of video game. Popcornfud (talk) 20:19, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

However, do we have a source for that? I can sorta believe it in the countries where personal computing was more popular than consoles like UK/EU, but we would need a source to discuss that distinction --Masem (t) 23:55, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Masem, can sorta believe it I'm telling you, it's true! But yes, obviously we'll need a source to add it. It's kind of an annoying bias in the article I'd like to fix. Popcornfud (talk) 08:33, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I found some sourcing that gives reason that "computer game" may be used interchangeably with "video game" in some places. --Masem (t) 16:00, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I can provide plenty of examples of UK RSes using the terms interchangeably, but for this article we really need a RS explaining that the terms are used interchangeably. Popcornfud (talk) 16:33, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The source I found is from a Wolf/Perron book , so that should be fine. --Masem (t) 16:47, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I didn't see you'd updated the article. Thanks for that. Popcornfud (talk) 17:49, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Taken to talk after consensus was requested. File:Pong (28684491143).jpg is an evocative photo, but an idiosyncratic one. Videogames are very rarely played on 10" high television sets with dinner plate sized controller wheels. I replaced it with File:American Truck Simulator at Gamescom 2015 (20429525295).jpg as being a photo of a game on a regular-sized screen, but this apparently might have copyright issues. What would be a better photo? Pong on a regular television set, such as File:Pong game on TV.jpg? --Lord Belbury (talk) 10:01, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that an image of Pong being played on a TV 10x the normal size of most TV's isn't a very good representation, however the issue with the image you uploaded is the depiction of American Truck Simulator, which is a copyrighted game made by SCS Software. The thing that confuses me is the image is licenses under CC-SA-2.0 (Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alive 2.0 Generic) so it should be fine to use? ― Blaze The Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 14:41, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just because the Flickr user tagged it that doesn't mean the image is free of copyright, as that user cannot claim copyright on ATS software. That user released their photo as CC but the replication of the ATS screen is a derivative work, so it still has copyright ties to ATS. --Masem (t) 14:51, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ah ok. That makes sense. I had a feeling that was the reason. The copyright on the image threw me off though. ― Blaze The Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 14:57, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I know this the lead image was previously discussed (here) after it was changed to an image of freedoom and changed back to the Pong one. I somewhat understand your point as perhaps Pong image could an example of one for suited for Early history of video games/Early history of video games but at the same time it does demonstrate an iconic, well-known, established video game with players playing one (though I understand the controllers/setup are slightly unusual). I am not sure File:Pong game on TV.jpg is an improvement as it does not actually show any player(s) actually playing it. If the 'ideal image' was a player playing a 'regular game' on a 'regular setup' (like your suggested one at desk with a monitor, or alternatively on a sofa with a large television) it is difficult as the screenshot gameplay image are usually always copyrighted (except for those few games that freely licensed, like 0 A.D. (video game), which is how we are able to have an extended gameplay video on Let's Play). Regards  Spy-cicle💥  ^Talk? 14:53, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:People_playing_video_games has a lot of photos with screens kind-of visible, but I don't know how many have actually been checked and considered de minimis. How about File:Universum TV Multispiel 2006.jpg, though? Pong on a sofa, from a different museum. --Lord Belbury (talk) 18:23, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is that almost any nominal concept of a video game today is going to have copyrighted screen elements. The Pong graphics are simple enough to not qualify, and while being played on an oversized screen is atypical, we're also showing pretty much the first commercial successful video game, and that it is a specialty museum display. I don't think there's any issue with it. --Masem (t) 14:54, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I do agree that a more "typical" video game image would be a better lead image if it were possible to get round the copyright issues. Popcornfud (talk) 15:02, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Any objection to File:Universum TV Multispiel 2006.jpg? --Lord Belbury (talk) 12:19, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

With no objections raised, I've replaced the giant pong screen with this museum photo. --Lord Belbury (talk) 11:51, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It may be worth thinking about finding an "ideal" photo of someone playing a regular game on a modern, regular setup, and just editing a different game onto the screen, one which doesn't contradict the setup being used. Should be a relatively easy photoshop job, putting a rectangle over another rectangle. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Indie_video_games has some games which have released screenshots for free use. --Lord Belbury (talk) 18:24, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Image (screenshot) of one of the earliest video games (Tennis for Two) in the lead section would be better than an image of two children playing a game. It would be similar with the articles of music and movie. Moreover, other languages version of this article have image (screenshot) of a video game in the lead section. AimanAbir18plus (talk) 12:57, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In the 4th paragraph, this sentence appears: "In the 2000s, the core industry centered on "AAA" games, leaving little room for riskier, experimental games." This is an opinion that should either be removed, or reworded and given citations as to who believes AAA gaming prevents riskier, experimental games. MisterDogHeart (talk) 10:28, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's sourced in intro of the "History" section. --Masem (t) 15:43, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I believe both places need a rewording, then. Right now both in the history section and at the top, the claim is made as if it is an objective fact and not the opinion held by video game historians, breaking the neutral point of view guideline. MisterDogHeart (talk) 13:32, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please remove the mention of chess from the lead; chess itself is not a computer game, and every computer-based iteration I’m aware of can’t be played without a video display. Maybe it’s referring to early text-based chess games?, but at best the claim needs clarification. 151.132.206.250 (talk) 19:34, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: Many early chess programs, dating back to the 50s, were text only. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 20:26, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can that be clarified in the text rather than broadly referring to all chess games? Text adventures are by definition text-based; chess games are not. —151.132.206.250 (talk) 18:47, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{edit semi-protected}} template. I think it's pretty clear that chess computer games are being discussed based on the prose. Computer games are not all video games—for example text adventure games, chess... It's clearly speaking of computer game versions of chess. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 18:54, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Then can we change it to read that they may not depend on a graphics display? Because the majority that are played today certainly do, despite our categorically saying they do not. —151.132.206.250 (talk) 16:47, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Done I made it, first, computer chess which covers hardware versions. And added a may in there tl be clear that a display may not always be required. --Masem (t) 16:56, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Clears up any possible confusion that we’re saying something unfactual. —151.132.206.250 (talk) 18:13, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Does anyone have a problem with me adding Women and video games to the see also section? I know it says to add any related links to Outline of video games, and I have done so. However, women and video games seems like a very closely related page to this Wikipedia page and is not currently linked anywhere on the page. Who says we can have Lists of video games and List of accessories to video games by system linked in this see also section but no others? I understand there is probably a desire not to let the see also section become overloaded but I see no consensus for these two links or limiting the section to only these two, so I ask if we can please make an exception to also allow the inclusion of this one link. Helper201 (talk) 04:41, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's too specific of a link. That page is linked through video game culture though. --Masem (t) 03:46, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Terminology section claims that all video games require a computer, which I find misleading, since some early games such as Pong or (despite it's name) Computer Space did not use any kind of computer or processor. --217.149.173.6 (talk) 11:02, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There was some type of fundamental computer circuit that meets the definition of a computing device. They may not be what today we think of as computers, but they would fit the definition of what computers were back then. --Masem (t) 12:27, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 4 July 2022 and 16 August 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): OneGoodNut (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by OneGoodNut (talk) 00:18, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 September 2022 and 8 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Rt2510 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Yanlzhu (talk) 20:30, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Change the tense of 'involves' in "Video games,[a] also known as computer games, are electronic games that involves interaction" to 'involve' for subject-verb agreement. Andrewdimola (talk) 04:09, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Highway 89 (talk) 04:22, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

change http://www.gamepro.com/article/news/220936/spacechem-used-as-educational-tool-in-schools/ to https://animeallstories.blogspot.com/2023/05/the-original.html Adarsh0209 (talk) 04:33, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: Archived source is infinitely better than a blog, which is not WP:RS Cannolis (talk) 05:13, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 August 2023 and 15 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Wheretheresawill9.

— Assignment last updated by Thecanyon (talk) 05:32, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

At the bottom this says its an American invention, but reading this and Early history of video games it seems like it could be an American or British or Canadian invention depending on what you call a video game or what you call an invention. It should be changed to say this instead of just saying its an American invention. 2A02:C7C:6424:5500:599E:DE08:3FED:1914 (talk) 14:11, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done removed the non defining category. M.Bitton (talk) 15:04, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wow this is interesting — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.204.185.176 (talk) 23:18, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Computer and video game distinction has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 22 § Computer and video game distinction until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 21:31, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Game trading has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 22 § Game trading until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 21:32, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Electronic entertainment has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 22 § Electronic entertainment until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 21:35, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Videogame type has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 22 § Videogame type until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 21:39, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Video game demographics has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 22 § Video game demographics until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 21:43, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Game deck has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 22 § Game deck until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 21:57, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 13 August 2024 and 17 December 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Javier0192 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Javier0192 (talk) 18:55, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 16 January 2019 and 22 May 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Dwylrcbc.

— Assignment last updated by Charshenk (talk) 14:53, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

id like to add something about the history of video games that hasn't been mention in this article 75.88.26.243 (talk) 19:56, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done for now: These requests are for just that, but you have to first explain what you what to add, accompanied by reliable sources. I'm closing this but when you're ready just open a new request. DrOrinScrivello (talk) 20:08, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i dont know about that, it would be pretty borrrring 50.202.188.102 (talk) 14:37, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Image (screenshot) of one of the earliest video games (Tennis for Two) in the lead section would be better than an image of two children playing a game. It would be similar with the articles of music and movie. Moreover, other languages version of this article have image (screenshot) of a video game in the lead section. AimanAbir18plus (talk) 12:57, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

While Tennis for Two is one of the first games, Pong is far more comparable to A Trip to the Moon, neither being the first of their media type but considered the work that laid the foundations for everything that followed. Pong is also far more recognizable than Tennis for Two. Masem (t) 13:01, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, with video games, we are burdened by copyright that most game images are still non-free and thus we can't use screenshots directly (but a picture of children playing a game is fine). Masem (t) 13:03, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But screenshot of Tennis for Two is free and could be used. Otherwise the gameplay gif of Pong could be used. AimanAbir18plus (talk) 16:42, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In fact, a gameplay GIF of "Pong" would be ideal for the lead section because it clearly demonstrates how the game is played. This is crucial for anyone wanting to understand the game's mechanics. AimanAbir18plus (talk) 16:45, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An image of the Pong screen is not free, so that's not an option Masem (t) 16:48, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That GIF is already in use in this article. AimanAbir18plus (talk) 17:00, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Masem. Masem I think it’s fair to compromise on allowing the use of the second image I tried to add. I did not remove the Pong image and I added an image showing a screen as requested (though I don't think that should be a requirement).

I think the lead should have an image showing adults gaming, given this is the primary video game market. Below I've listed a number of options for what we could place in the lead as well as retaining the Pong image.

• 
  A.
• 
  B.
• 
  C.
• 
  D.
• 
  E.

I'm sure we can find an image showing adults gaming to use in the lead. I'm open to suggestions if none of the above ones can be agreed upon; nevertheless, I think the use of any of these while maintaining the Pong image is a fair compromise. Helper201 (talk) 01:54, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The main thing for the Pong image is that it is a clearly recognizable game, one of the defining ones of the entire genre. While one might argue that video games are aimed at adults, they are also aimed at children and across age groups, so it doesn't make sense it to try to force "adult playing video game" photo as the lede one. Masem (t) 02:48, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe you misunderstand, I'm not attempting to remove the Pong image. Yes, video games are aimed at adults, children and across age groups, but the lead image does not represent that whatsoever, it instead only represents the non-primary demographic. No one is trying to "force" anything here. You are the only person that has come out in opposition to this and I have tried on multiple occasions at a compromise, both by keeping the Pong image within the lead, choosing a different image after you disagreed with the first I tried and then also now listing multiple different options for alternatives. Helper201 (talk) 01:11, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think the assumption that adults are the primary demographic is not clear. While I would not be surprised to see that games that cater towards older audiences draw the most revenue, that doesn't equate to them being the most significant demographic.

And again, I still believe that for a thumbnail at the top of the page, the simplicity of the Pong screen is very readable, while the other offered images are not clear or lack a screen at all. Masem (t) 01:15, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Which of the following should be the lead image? 01:14, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

• 
  Current lead image
• 
  A.
• 
  B.
• 
  C.
• 
  D.
• 
  E.
• 
  F.
• 
  G.
• 
  H.

• Yes, option A, B, C, G, or H. Adults are the primary market/demographic for video games. Using only one image showing children using a video game is therefore not representative for a lead image. I'm willing to compromise by keeping the Pong image in the lead since it does have historical significance. I've listed a variety of options for another primary image for the lead above listed A to E. If you agree with a lead image above that of the Pong image (while still also retaining the Pong image in the lead) or think that the Pong image should be replaced by a new image entirely then please also choose an A to E option or provide your own alternative. Helper201 (talk) 01:21, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• F or C because they're both modern, and the images include both women and men playing video games unlike the current lead image and option E. Option A doesn't include an image of the video game itself, and B and D only have one person in their respective images, so I would oppose those options. Some1 (talk) 04:54, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Current Lead Image which you did not assign a letter for some reason. (A) does not show a game, (B) is a driving simulator which most games do not resemble, and the others all have copyrighted material in them. The current image is actually perfect because it succinctly demonstrates the game, the console, and the players without any other distractions in the image, Pong is an iconic video game that most readers will recognize, and its simple design makes it ineligible for copyright issues. TarkusAB^talk/contrib 06:00, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Current lead image per Tarkus, but I was pretty much going to say the exact same thing so that's not fair. Option A does not show a game. The left two people have some fun action faces, but the guy on the left is standing like a doofus. Option B does not reflect a typical gaming experience. The coloring is nice, though. Option C has copyright material all over it. The screen is very busy with a lot of motion. The two on the far left and right are wearing the headphones weird. Looks like an Ikea. No controllers are visible. Option D has copyright material all over it. The screen is a bit white blasted and busy. The guy is standing like I would at a kiosk: a big dork. Option E has copyright material all over it. The screens have bad glare. Controllers aren't visible. The far right guy's posture is impeccable, and so is the girl's (and her hair), but why the heck is she wearing a shirt with "Google" on it lol. The image is complex and all over the place. Option F has copyright material all over it. Weird action stills. Stupid looking off-centered boxes. Busy colors. I wonder what that guy in the back is interviewing that person about. Option G has copyright material all over it. There's no primary focus, which is cool for an image in general but not one where a subject matter is specified. It's pretty dark. Aged "red eye" glare. That dude needs a cap that fits his head better. I wonder what that guy in the back is interviewing that person about. Option H has copyright material all over it. The 2007 clothing is fun, and very immersive to the time, and also on brand with the pictures we pick on Wikipedia (shrug guy comes to mind). Weird floor geometry blocks the photo. Very busy.

But, Current image? I'd buy them a drink, if they'd even let me. The simplicity of the room and the color palette. The visible screen, console and controllers. And the two cutest little buttons I've ever seen playing it. Let me say that I don't understand why you think video games are an "adult" market. It's certainly a market for everyone. No copyright of any kind in this picture, not even the clothes. No distractions or false focus. Pong is not only a universal demonstration for both the concept of a video game but also a big root of its history. Panini! • 🥪 06:38, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Current lead image. That another picture might reflect current trends better is no reason, this is about the subject as a whole. Pong is quintessential, the local two-people-on-the-couch-multiplayer says more than some pictures taken at industry shows. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 07:19, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Current lead image. As per reasons given by Tarkus, Panini and Soetermans. "Updating" the image doesn't gain us anything, but it could cause us to lose a lot. Pong is one of the bedrocks of video game history and widely recognised by people outside of the subject - X201 (talk) 09:01, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Far far too early to be starting an RFC, where you only had three editors above, as well as the fact that the lede image has been discussed in the past (see page archives). Masem (t) 12:59, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Unnecessary RFC. ―Howard • 🌽³³ 18:46, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion wasn't getting any responses other than from Masem and they showed no signs of being willing to compromise or work a way forward despite me putting forward various suggestions, so unless I opened an RFC things seemed like they would remain at a standstill. Helper201 (talk) 00:09, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Came here from WP:RFC/All. Is the RfC asking if there should be another image in the lead (in addition to the current one)? I guess I've never seen a lead with multiple images before (besides ones with collages). Anyway, I've changed the lead image [1]. If you and other editors are okay with the new image, then this RfC can be closed. Some1 (talk) 02:02, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That doesn't work either, because no video game is actually shown, just people with controllers in their hands. — Masem (t) 02:22, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I've updated it with another image. Some1 (talk) 02:32, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Again, from above, we have had previous discussions on this talk page about the current Pong image. You should not be changing it without getting a larger consensus first. Masem (t) 04:24, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

By "larger consensus", you mean an RfC right? So your "Far far too early to be starting an RFC" statement is off the mark, tbh. Some1 (talk) 04:43, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea why there's a discussion about whether the image should be updated or not. The Pong image is more illustrative and universal, and is more easily understood to more people. Pong can be understood by all ages, but Fire Emblem Warriors cannot. Cukie Gherkin (talk) 06:30, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Consensus can be reached without an RfC. In any case, Masem is right—the image shouldn't be changed without consensus, especially during an ongoing RfC. – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 06:38, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]