Hi Moondragon21. Thank you for your work on Andrew MacKay (Canadian politician). Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

the constituency is Oxford North according to the source

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:27, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Moondragon21. Thank you for your work on Georges Massicotte. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for writing the article! Have a blessed and wonderful days ahead!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 11:10, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Moondragon21. Thank you for your work on Roger Mantovani. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for starting this page; appropriately sources for now, although his death remains breaking news. This seems marginally better than the Italian page, at least for now!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 17:32, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Bangladesh protests (2022–2024) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

claims there was a continuous stream of protests in the region from 2022-2024 which is not supported by any WP:RS. Fails WP:V and is complete WP:OR. 2024 July Revolution (Bangladesh) is unrelated to this. Not a single source says there were any such protests in 2022 and 2023, and in mid 2024 a completely unrepated protest took place that has veen merged here to make an imaginary 2 years long protest!

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:30, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Ana Orsini has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 23 § Ana Orsini until a consensus is reached. Dclemens1971 (talk) 14:04, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Moondragon21,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Results of the 2025 German federal election for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.

If you don't want Results of the 2025 German federal election to be deleted, you can , but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 13:38, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | February 2025, Vol 11, Issue 2, Nos. 326, 327, 330, 331 Online events: New: Black women | Alphabet run C & D Continuing, year-long initiatives: #1day1woman | Music Announcements from other communities: Wiki Loves Ramadan begins on 25 February - a great opportunity to focus on women from Islamic history Tip of the month: Looking for an image? Sometimes you can find openly licensed ones on Creative Commons search Suggestion: Consider helping to promote women under In the news and On this day on Wikipedia's main page Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 08:55, 26 January 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:2021 in Armenia by month indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:18, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarize yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that.

I'm really sorry to have to do a formal warning, especially to an apparently good faith and dedicated editor. But you're just WP:NOTGETTINGIT about your WP:DISRUPTIVE editing, which users can be blocked for. I'm only here to help! I truly believe in you.

I can see at a glance that you're doing lots of editing that's simply a content mill. (WP:NOT) You've been told zillions of times for a very long time, exactly why and how to stop. You have stated and demonstrated that your goal is absolute quantity of indiscriminate content. You won't engage with your Talk page, and only engage at the countless deletion discussions, many of which exist just to warn you. Somehow you don't see that your Talk page is a gigantic wasteland of pleas to stop. You have wasted inordinate amounts of precious time and energy of volunteers, for a very very long time. The zillions of deletions show that you clearly don't even value your own time and energy, and aren't trying to make content that shouldn't be deleted.

In one instance, you hand-waved away the explicit warning about notability, and replied to indicate that you kinda think notability is a suggestion.[1] (WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT). It absolutely is not, and it actually is a policy that we all can be blocked for violating. You've made a WP:LINKFARM of WP:ELNO WP:USERGEN WP:IMDB.[2] Back before you recently started sidestepping AfC, you spammed AfC repeatedly, like this one article three times.[3] They told you so many times to stop and why.

In one of the zillions of needless deletion discussions, it sounds like you said you did know better than to create that article, but you thought the Women in Red project is some kind of exception.[4] I know the Women in Red criteria document says that it is explicitly there to teach newbies how to game Wikipedia's system (including by dodging AfC) and to wrongfully create scattershot content in the hope that some of it might not be deleted.[5] That's brutally zealous and wrong, akin to spam, and I hope that project gets corrected, but we can't follow a bad example even if WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. That project runs the razor's edge of WP:RGW, and they make it sound like there could be something wrong with lacking a Wikipedia article or that the subject of women is magical. I've participated with many supplemental special projects like Women in Red or black history month, but discriminately, and usually making one permanently complete article each time. At least in this current month, you ran roughshod over Women in Red's evasive and threadbare criteria, you used even lower standards than theirs, and you used far lower standards than the policies that you're already accustomed to being constantly told about. Projects don't override Wikipedia policy.

Obviously, nobody should be making stub articles unless for literally categorically notable subjects like the National Historical Register, but you spammed the creation of about a dozen deleteable articles just today. I'm pretty sure none of them have content proving WP:GNG. Many cite their own promotional press releases, and one has your own "proud father" text.[6] (WP:PROMO WP:PRIMARY WP:NPOV) People have tried so hard to teach you how to properly collaborate, like here.

So here's an outline for anybody in this situation. But this is also especially how you stay out of WP:ANI, because your long and exhaustive history is exactly why ANI exists.

1) Absolutely stop editing until you understand what an encyclopedia is, and change your objective so that it is to create content of policy-compliant quality that is beyond question and can never be deleted. You're so close!

2) Today, move each of the stubs you ever created, ever, to be relocated under your userspace because they aren't fit for main space. Fill or delete all the empty categories you ever created.

3) Read and understand WP:DISRUPTIVE, WP:GNG, WP:N, WP:RS, WP:PRIMARY, WP:PROMO, WP:EDITSUMMARY for starters. You constantly hit a lot of WP:DISRUPTSIGNS. Read all the dozens of deletion discussions you've needlessly forced, at least of the last couple months, and read the vital policies they linked to you over and over. They have more of the political criteria.

4) Start using your sandbox, which just means to create new documents under your user space. Resume only using (not abusing) AfC for submitting your sandbox content that you had already improved to C class. That means it's AfC-worthy and deletion-proof. Ask at WP:TEAHOUSE and compare to WP:NOT, to confirm your encyclopedic comprehension that your content is truly necessary, rather than waste AfC's time. Everybody needs another point of view, so they can stay neutral and notable. Always use meaningful edit summaries to aid fellow Wikipedians in tracking each change, not meaningless things like "updated" or blank.

5) Truly discern quality. As you go, ask yourself "is this content vitally necessary and encyclopedic?", "am I dumping a job on someone else?", "could I find or re-read a policy about what I'm doing?", and "am I guessing? could I ask WP:TEAHOUSE?"

I only wrote this because I know you're good, I know you're way better than this, and I know you want to be great! I wouldn't do that for anybody else! Good job on your exquisite formatting skills of citations, infoboxes, and templates and great stuff like that. That skillset is called a WP:WIKIGNOME which applies to impove already existing articles, but you're mis-applying that to the creation of articles.

Thanks. — Smuckola(talk) 06:19, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• I think "zillions" of mistakes is a misrepresentation. I have nearly 70,000 edits over almost 6 years. Which stubs aren't fit for main space? They have been reviewed and other editors have thanked me and are contributing to them making them better. The most recent ones are in the same style as others. I have been told about formatting in the past and am comfortable with the standards. On Women in Red, I was invited to the project by User:Ipigott last year and haven't been told that I was doing the wrong thing if anything the opposite. This was my first time properly engaging with the community. I feel singled out I always act in good faith so being under threat of being blocked confuses me. Am I disruptive or am I doing good job overall? Moondragon21 (talk) 18:13, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Erecia Hepburn. Thanks! Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 05:06, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Erecia Hepburn, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 05:07, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lemonaka was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

ballotpedia.org , is not a reliable source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ron Fowler (politician) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Lemonaka 10:40, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Moondragon21! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -Lemonaka 10:40, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ron Fowler (politician), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

-Samoht27 (talk) 15:46, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Women's ministers of the Maldives indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:45, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | March 2025, Vol 11, Issue 3, Nos. 326, 327, 332, 333, 334 Online events: New: Alphabet run E & F | Artists+Activists | Women of the Arab World Continuing, year-long initiatives: #1day1woman | Music Announcements from other communities: March editathons around the world Celebrate Women 2025 office hour series Tip of the month: You can access the Wikipedia Library if you have made 500+ edits, and 6+ months editing, and 10+ edits in the last 30 days, and No active blocks Moving the needle:[1] 27 Jan 2025: 20.031% of biographies on EN-WP are about women (2,047,793 bios, 410,200 women) 23 Dec 2024: 20.009% (2,041,741 bios, 408,531 women) Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 1,669 articles during this period! Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 08:55, 25 February 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

The article Immigration to Jamaica has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There seems little point for this pages, as written, which does not even mention the largest movement of people to Jamaica, that is, Africans.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:33, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Ambassadors of Jamaica to Trinidad and Tobago indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 11:13, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Moondragon21. Thank you for your work on Casey Farrell. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for the creating this page for Farrell. While he hasn't been elected to a federal seat, there is sufficient coverage in independent sources to justify including (as there is for most Australian state politicians).

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 21:59, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your message :) Moondragon21 (talk) 22:06, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I've started the review of Template:Did you know nominations/Migration background. There are some small problems with the citing of the article. I'll watch it and be on the look out for all paragraphs getting cited. Overall, good work. 🌿MtBotany (talk) 19:23, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you User:MtBotany. I have added more references I think the problems are fixed now. Moondragon21 (talk) 20:34, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Moondragon21, I want to apologize because I believe I have overwritten your edit on Sahra Wagenknecht Alliance. I have a pretty sloppy way of editing where I make quite ambitious edits and often search for sources on the spot. Add procrastination to that, and it might take me hours. I just pushed my edit in and my heart sank when I saw the edit conflict message. I just said "oh well" and pushed it through. Feel free to correct anything. Sorry! Brat Forelli🦊 21:58, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It seems you travelled 11 days into the future with your edit anyway :D Brat Forelli🦊 22:03, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Brat Forelli, no problem your addition looks better than mine anyway! XD Moondragon21 22:08, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Moondragon21. Thank you for your work on Zada Salihović. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for adding this translation; entirely appropriate for an elected polititian in a national parliament.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 18:13, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Violence against elderly people has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Remsense ‥ 论 23:10, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article 2025 Italian local elections which you translated, has 27 links to your user-page. I am not sure what the purpose of these is/is meant to be, so do not want to mass delete them, but please reword/remove them, as we do not allow links to user pages in our articles as per MOS:DRAFTNOLINK - Thank you - Arjayay (talk) 10:51, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks for the notification. This was a mistake with the translation feature, it looked different in the mainspace. It was supposed to be a simple colours. I have now fixed this. Moondragon21 (talk) 06:18, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for doing that - best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 08:41, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | April 2025, Vol 11, Issue 4, Nos. 326, 327, 335, 336 Online events: New: Alphabet run G & H | Business Continuing, year-long initiatives: #1day1woman | Music Announcements (Events facilitated by others): The European Destubathon – a stub improvement contest/editathon from 1–30 April 2025 Tip of the month: When creating biographies, don't forget to use Template:DEFAULTSORT. Accessible from "Wiki markup" at the foot of the page being edited, it allows categories to be listed under the subject's family name rather than their first or given name. Moving the needle: (statistics available via Humaniki tool) 24 Mar 2025: 20.070% of biographies on EN-WP are about women (2,057,083, 412,857 women) 27 Jan 2025: 20.031% (2,047,793 bios, 410,200 women) Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 2,657 articles during this period! Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest

--Rosiestep (talk) 13:20, 30 March 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Hello Moondragon21,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Bianca Mayer for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can , but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Drat8sub (talk) 14:58, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited County Down, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Downshire.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:59, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am grateful for your appreciation. Would you be able to help me roll out the template on former MPs' pages? The more editors are involved, the faster the job is completed. Robin S. Taylor (talk) 19:18, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• You're welcome @Robin S. Taylor:. The template for the UK election last year. I can help where I can. 20:29, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Moondragon21

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Bianca Mayer for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can , but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Drat8sub (talk) 07:03, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On 2 April 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Migration background, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that more than a quarter of the population of Germany is of migration background? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Migration background. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Migration background), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Darin Chappell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darin Chappell until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Launchballer 19:57, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Moondragon21. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bradley Kelly, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:06, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Leslie Church has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 April 17 § Leslie Church until a consensus is reached. Ivanvector's squirrel (^trees/_nuts) 00:30, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please learn how to use the visual editor correctly, so you don't do shit like this. Dicklyon (talk) 05:40, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]