Top edits to an page
All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.
| Page | Astrology (Log · Page History) |
| User | Zachariel (Edit Counter· Top Edits) |
| Total edits | 347 |
| Minor edits | 53 (15.3%) |
| (Semi-)automated edits | 23 (6.6%) |
| Reverted edits | 31 (8.9%) |
| atbe1 | 1.1 |
| Added (bytes)2 | 87,220 |
| Deleted (bytes) | -24,692 |
Minor edits
·
53 (15.3%)
Major edits
·
294 (84.7%)
(Semi-)automated edits
·
23 (6.6%)
Manual edits
·
324 (93.4%)
Reverted edits
·
31 (8.9%)
Unreverted edits
·
316 (91.1%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
| Date | Links | Size | Edit summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-07-17 17:33 | Diff · History | 23 | (reverted) →Modern scientific appraisal: Tagging ref 59 - see talk section: The Hartmann, Reuter and Nyborg paper - ref 59 |
| 2012-07-16 13:04 | Diff · History | 67 | (reverted) No they have not - if you think so raise the issue on the talk page, establish that is the consensus, and follow my suggestion for a request for gaining comment from uninvolved editors. Also suggest you follow my suggestion to you on talk |
| 2012-07-16 12:43 | Diff · History | 67 | (reverted) IRWolfie - You have raised concerns about sources not being reliable yourself; talk page is full of concerns about the neutrality of content YOU have developed. Therefore you should not remove this tag - no one should whilst the discussion continues |
| 2012-07-16 12:26 | Diff · History | 67 | (reverted) Talk page discussion needs attention and input. Several issues of concern have been raised about the content being affected by bias and the suitability of the content's sources. |
| 2012-07-16 11:58 | Diff · History | -5 | →Precession: WP:POV |
| 2012-07-16 11:55 | Diff · History | 39 | →Precession: A better amendment to previous content, adopting a more neutral tone to our report of their work, following WP:NPV |
| 2012-07-16 11:51 | Diff · History | 415 | →Precession: Clarifying that the tropical zodiac addresses the issue of precession - the word 'avoiding' suggest that it ignores it |
| 2012-07-16 11:26 | Diff · History | -11 | Precession is not an 'astronomical mistake' - see ongoing talk discussion and proposal to move this section. You should discuss and seek approval before changing topic headers |
| 2012-07-14 18:01 | Diff · History | -1 | →Theological viewpoints: This section was developed by editorial consensus to specifically hold theological criticisms - a change of title implies it gives a balanced account of all theological views, which it does not |
| 2012-07-06 18:13 | Diff · History | 11 | →Modern scientific appraisal: Copyedit (minor) - it is Popper's authorative ref that should be used as support for the initial pseudoscience statement |
| 2012-07-01 20:09 | Diff · History | 65 | →References: updating inactive link |
| 2012-07-01 19:59 | Diff · History | 42 | →Indian and South Asian: dead link - giving cached view |
| 2012-07-01 19:46 | Diff · History | -78 | Removing dead hyperlink |
| 2012-07-01 19:38 | Diff · History | -1 | →Effect on European culture: sp |
| 2012-07-01 19:36 | Diff · History | 1 | Replacing contraction |
| 2012-07-01 19:32 | Diff · History | -30 | Removing redundant title words from subheadings, per MOS:HEAD |
| 2012-06-30 14:11 | Diff · History | 438 | (reverted) →Modern scientific appraisal: Making it clear why Popper's views have been adopted as authoritative |
| 2012-06-30 03:32 | Diff · History | 34 | (reverted) →Modern scientific appraisal: Have explained on talk, the problem is not resolved. Let other editors be aware of the concerns regarding the misleading implications of this remark, which is not supported by the source |
| 2012-06-30 02:05 | Diff · History | -108 | →Effect on European culture: Fixing formatting |
| 2012-06-30 02:03 | Diff · History | 141 | →Modern scientific appraisal: Tagging the content with problems identified on the talk page. See "appraisal of content of modern scientific appraisal section" |
| 2012-06-30 01:49 | Diff · History | -18 | →Modern scientific appraisal: Removing ref that does not qualify the point. Not needed anyway because the comment is cited to another source. See talk for full details |
| 2012-06-28 18:17 | Diff · History | 44 | (reverted) Undid revision 499789234 by Skinwalker "Please do not remove this message until the dispute is resolved". Resolution is found in removing, editing or substantiating dubious content - not removing the tag |
| 2012-06-28 17:46 | Diff · History | 44 | (reverted) Undid revision 499786542 by Raeky Consensus and 3RR is overrided by editorial duty to tag false, unreliable and unverifiable comments - explained on talk. Please contribute if you feel able to substantiate. |
| 2012-06-28 17:34 | Diff · History | 86 | Note the instruction - "Please do not remove this message until the dispute is resolved". Resolution is found in removing, editing or substantiating dubious content - not removing the tag |
| 2012-06-28 16:57 | Diff · History | -1 | This highlights the problem - synth presented as fact - clearly unverifiable. The tag should *not* be removed whilst disputed unverifiable comments remain on the page |
| 2012-06-28 16:43 | Diff · History | 83 | (reverted) Undid revision 499777199 by IRWolfie- (talk) The justification o fhte tags has been given clearly. If you belief the disputed comment in the lede is verifiable, provide a verifiable source |
| 2012-06-28 16:04 | Diff · History | 53 | Tagging the obvious problems created by the bias of recent edits. See talk |
| 2012-06-23 14:53 | Diff · History | 1,273 | (reverted) →Core principles: Restoring content that is accurate, well sourced and approved by extensive collaborative discussion (check talk-page history). Bacon was a philosopher and a product of his own times, not ours. |
| 2012-06-08 04:27 | Diff · History | 2,073 | (reverted) No, I don't need approval to correct and add references. If you want to remove verifiable information, you discuss, and be thoughtful and selective in your editorial approach. Otherwise you are engaging in vandalism. |
| 2012-06-08 03:29 | Diff · History | 2,073 | (reverted) Reverted to revision 496534547 by Zachariel: I am restoring this - and noting that DV immediately undoes every edit I make, censoring all the reliable and well-cited info that is not to his anti-astrology liking. (TW) |
| 2012-06-08 01:50 | Diff · History | 233 | →Core principles: Not "later", these remarks were made before publication of Harmica Mundi. This needs looking at as more recent research has proven Kepler's sincere commitment and use of horoscopes for his own personal (unpaid) concerns |
| 2012-06-08 01:24 | Diff · History | 178 | →Etymology: The change of terminology didn't happen until centuries after Copernicus, so citing this comment because it is controversial |
| 2012-06-08 01:21 | Diff · History | 1 | →Etymology: The more usual astrological order |
| 2012-06-08 01:15 | Diff · History | 82 | →Etymology: ‘Permanent’ is the wrong word and we don’t need the repeat of ‘visible’ (their visibility hasn’t changed) – this gives the correct definition: that their apparent movement is constrained within the zodiac belt. |
| 2012-06-08 00:56 | Diff · History | 379 | →References: Adding sources |
| 2012-06-08 00:53 | Diff · History | 25 | →Core principles: m |
| 2012-06-08 00:49 | Diff · History | 311 | →Core principles: Adding ref |
| 2012-06-08 00:41 | Diff · History | 809 | →Core principles: This reference to Ptolemy should probably go into the history section - suggest the recent addition is taken out or moved. It was inaccurate without this fix |
| 2012-06-08 00:20 | Diff · History | -288 | →Modern scientific appraisal: Most astrologers would not, nor would they expect the omission of Neptune to create mistakes - the discovery of Neptune is simply irrelevant |
| 2012-06-08 00:15 | Diff · History | 25 | →Modern scientific appraisal: This is the skeptic view and should be presented as such - it needs proper citation, something more weighty than 'About.com' would add crednce to this article |
| 2012-05-23 10:38 | Diff · History | 1,158 | →Etymology: Useful here, where we talking about the historical distinction between astrology and astronomy. |
| 2012-05-23 10:32 | Diff · History | 37 | Failed verification tag |
| 2012-05-22 14:43 | Diff · History | 2,528 | (reverted) Johnuniq - please use the talk page to explain why you believe this historical definition, published in a highly repuatble source is either promotional or misleading of its subject - and don't remove tags without explanation or addressing the problem |
| 2012-05-22 11:01 | Diff · History | 1,334 | →History: Skinwalker - this has been discussed on the talk page - make your case there if you feel there is any appropriate reason for this varifiable and relevant content to be removed |
| 2012-05-22 10:57 | Diff · History | 37 | →Etymology: Tagging misleading comment that is not verified by its source |
| 2012-05-22 10:52 | Diff · History | 1,157 | →Etymology: Historical definition which is also useful for demonstrating traditional division of astrology into natural and non-natural topics (so far not referenced on this page) |
| 2012-05-22 10:24 | Diff · History | 153 | →References: Source text for a reference |
| 2012-05-22 10:22 | Diff · History | 1,333 | →History: Reinstalling debated comment after talk-page discussion and tweaks |
| 2012-05-17 22:43 | Diff · History | -149 | →History: snipping quote to remove a published comment that might lead some editors to argue this implies support or academic acceptance of modern astrological practice (!) |
| 2012-05-17 22:30 | Diff · History | 1,306 | Reverted edits by Dominus Vobisdu (talk) to last version by Discospinster |
| 2012-05-13 16:45 | Diff · History | -22 | →History: Changed wording to 'promoted' to avoid unecessary controversy |
| 2012-05-13 16:25 | Diff · History | 27 | →History: Copyedit (minor) |
| 2012-05-13 16:22 | Diff · History | 442 | →History: providing further reference to satisfy cite request |
| 2012-05-13 14:56 | Diff · History | 1,030 | Rolled back by mistake and so missed chance for an edit summary, but there was a legitimate reason - see explanation on the talk page |
| 2012-05-13 14:32 | Diff · History | 1,030 | (reverted) Reverted edits by IRWolfie- (talk) to last version by Zachariel |
| 2012-05-13 12:49 | Diff · History | -211 | →References: Removing book title from list of referenced works - appears to be promotional addition since text is not referenced in the article |
| 2012-05-13 12:46 | Diff · History | 1,341 | The proposed text is unsupportable, and since a RFC has been raised, Saedon should allow discussion full discussion before continuing to puch this change |
| 2012-05-13 12:31 | Diff · History | 58 | →History: clearifying what "all of these subjects" refers to |
| 2012-05-13 12:28 | Diff · History | 971 | Explaining the motivation for scholarly interest in astrology and why its history remains of interest to our understanding of scientific development |
| 2011-12-05 15:23 | Diff · History | 20 | →Modern scientific appraisal: 199e? |
| 2011-12-05 15:21 | Diff · History | 316 | →Modern scientific appraisal: *If* this is notable ebnough for this article (it obviously is not) then the relevant detail from the reference used to support it must be given too. |
| 2011-12-01 07:47 | Diff · History | -45 | →Indian and South/West Asian astrology: No form of the zodiac is visible - only constellations are visible, not zodiac signs |
| 2011-11-21 15:22 | Diff · History | -2 | Reverted 1 edit by 117.201.137.249 (talk). (TW) |
| 2011-11-18 12:46 | Diff · History | 7 | →Scientific appraisal: Clarifying this is the modern (mainstream) scientific appraisal; not historical. Also clarifies that astrology's standing in oriental cutlures is something seperate to this |
| 2011-11-18 12:42 | Diff · History | 8 | →Cultural influence: Defining the theme more accurately |
| 2011-11-18 12:41 | Diff · History | 174 | →Indian and South/West Asian astrology: Correction misinformation about Tibetan astrology |
| 2011-11-18 12:35 | Diff · History | 34 | →Hindu astrology: Acknowledging Sri Lanka and Tibet |
| 2011-11-18 12:29 | Diff · History | 1,336 | →Chinese astrology: Copying material from Chinese zodiac page to cover other cultural modifications |
| 2011-11-18 12:24 | Diff · History | 39 | →Chinese astrology: Adding link to Chinese zodiac page |
| 2011-11-18 12:20 | Diff · History | 223 | →Chinese astrology: wikilinking Chinese zodiac animals |
| 2011-11-18 12:16 | Diff · History | 1 | →Chinese astrology: declunking |
| 2011-11-18 12:00 | Diff · History | 72 | →Chinese astrology: Adding ref |
| 2011-11-18 11:56 | Diff · History | -27 | Removing 'globalise' tag - no longer applicable: article now presents a good proportion of text on other cultural systems |
| 2011-11-18 11:54 | Diff · History | 1,329 | →Chinese astrology: Developing content on Chinese astrology |
| 2011-11-18 11:25 | Diff · History | 184 | →Works cited: Adding source text |
| 2011-11-18 11:06 | Diff · History | -21 | →Chinese astrology: Rewrite to remove misleading comments - see edit summaries on main Chinese astrology page |
| 2011-11-18 10:43 | Diff · History | 90 | →Hindu astrology: Making more sense of this comment for the general reader |
| 2011-11-18 10:40 | Diff · History | -120 | →Hindu astrology: Rem inaccuracy - most sub-systems have equivalents in HA, and the Lunar mansions are found in Hellenistic sources, see Lunar mansion and its refs |
| 2011-11-18 10:35 | Diff · History | 2 | →Hindu astrology: Making use of brackets more consistent |
| 2011-11-17 17:00 | Diff · History | -12 | →Western astrology: Simplfying |
| 2011-11-17 16:58 | Diff · History | 80 | →Western astrology: Fixing the implication this text left that Western astrology is more about sun-signs, and so more simplified than other forms |
| 2011-11-17 14:33 | Diff · History | -30 | →World traditions: copy edit |
| 2011-11-17 14:32 | Diff · History | 1 | →Western astrology: sp |
| 2011-11-17 14:21 | Diff · History | 53 | →Ancient world: adding link |
| 2011-11-17 14:15 | Diff · History | 33 | →Ancient world: Adding details link |
| 2011-11-17 14:13 | Diff · History | -38 | →Cultural influence: Adding 'details' link |
| 2011-11-17 14:10 | Diff · History | 40 | →Medieval Islamic world: Adding link |
| 2011-11-17 14:08 | Diff · History | -8 | →World traditions: Removing unneeded WL |
| 2011-11-17 14:07 | Diff · History | 30 | →Chinese astrology: Adding 'details' |
| 2011-11-17 14:06 | Diff · History | 28 | →Hindu astrology: Adding 'details' |
| 2011-11-17 14:04 | Diff · History | 27 | →Western astrology: Adding 'details' link |
| 2011-11-17 13:55 | Diff · History | 4 | →Scientific appraisal: Adding WL to Sagan |
| 2011-11-17 13:53 | Diff · History | -4 | →Cultural influence: 'Archetype' already WL-d |
| 2011-11-17 13:51 | Diff · History | -45 | →Cultural influence: Removing WL's that have already been given |
| 2011-11-17 13:48 | Diff · History | -4 | →20th and 21st century: Jung aklready wiki-linked |
| 2011-11-17 13:45 | Diff · History | -160 | →Medieval and early modern Europe: This is also duplicated text - nothing in this section, so removing for now. Content needs developing for this |
| 2011-11-17 13:44 | Diff · History | -1 | Moving text that was originated for 'effects on cultture' section which fits much better there (other comments lead in and out of it) |
| 2011-11-17 13:38 | Diff · History | -292 | →Medieval and early modern Europe: Removing duplicated text (best left in 'Med & early mod' because the point demonstrates the importance of Arabic texts in later transmissions |
| 2011-11-17 13:36 | Diff · History | -4 | →Chinese astrology: Removing duplicated WL |
| 2011-11-17 13:34 | Diff · History | -16 | Removing repeated wiki-links in line with MOS |
| 2011-11-17 13:30 | Diff · History | -4 | →Western astrology: Wikilink to 'horoscope' already given |
| 2011-11-17 13:28 | Diff · History | -37 | →Western astrology: Don't need to overdo wikilinks already given |
| 2011-11-17 13:24 | Diff · History | -2 | Core principles should be defined earlier, since following sections, including World traditions, make reference to related principles |
| 2011-11-17 13:20 | Diff · History | -45 | Divination link is given elsewhere, please don't just revert everything for one minor point, other changes were made, such as eliminating fautly refs. Better to put back the slight change you want as a new edit |
| 2011-11-17 13:13 | Diff · History | 496 | →Hindu astrology: Copy edit and re-ordering to remove duplicated points and disjointed narrative |
| 2011-11-17 12:37 | Diff · History | -45 | (reverted) →Western astrology: Copy edit, clarifying some misleading comments and removing redundant ref that was qualifying a comment now removed |
| 2011-11-17 12:31 | Diff · History | -30 | →World traditions: Removing comment which is a little misleading and not needed anyway |
| 2011-11-17 12:28 | Diff · History | 602 | Developing this footnote to demonstrate more clearly how the principle described, and modern source referred to efficiently captures gist of a complex core principle |
| 2011-11-17 12:13 | Diff · History | 0 | →Hindu astrology: Correcting wiki-link |
| 2011-11-17 12:10 | Diff · History | -1 | →Bibliography: Applying [[WP:FNNR] recommendation |
| 2011-11-17 12:09 | Diff · History | 1,034 | Replacing previously used ref with Culpeper ref to demonstrate more clearly that text is accurately summarising an important core principle |
| 2011-11-15 13:09 | Diff · History | 415 | →External links: Adding two discussed entries |
| 2011-11-11 18:40 | Diff · History | -22 | Title should stay (or raise for discussion). The point about them being CP is that they were widely transmitted and remain essential. They are not just the core principles of Hellenistic astrology. That title implies restriction to Hellenistic A. |
| 2011-11-11 17:59 | Diff · History | 1,361 | (reverted) Restoring passage also removed at a whim without any attempt to gain consensus or discuss perceived problems |
| 2011-11-11 17:55 | Diff · History | 491 | The reason for removing this directly relevant point of transmission is what exactly? If you query it, raise your concern on the talk-page |
| 2011-11-11 17:50 | Diff · History | 3,319 | →Core principles: This reliably referenced section is under review, so should be subject to consensus gathering discussion - not be ripped apart to satisfy the whims of hostile editors. |
| 2011-11-11 13:38 | Diff · History | 157 | →Core principles: Not sure how this image got dropped - it nicely illustrates the point and was created by Blake, an astrological illustrator |
| 2011-11-11 13:25 | Diff · History | 900 | →Core principles: Please see talk-discussion */Core principles re restoration of this text (the ref was added by me) |
| 2011-11-11 13:18 | Diff · History | 348 | (reverted) →Bibliography: Adding McRitchie source. (Correlation is RS for matters of astrological philosophy) |
| 2011-11-11 07:59 | Diff · History | 343 | Adding reference |
| 2011-11-11 07:49 | Diff · History | 147 | →Bibliography: Adding source text |
| 2011-11-11 06:13 | Diff · History | 17 | →Core principles: Undoing noformation's word change - the maxim was not "coined" by Bacon, only used by him along with others (Aquinas and Dante are two known to have used it centuries beforehand) - check ref which points this out |
| 2011-11-11 05:57 | Diff · History | 11 | Redoing non-problematic part of Noformation's text edit |
| 2011-11-11 05:52 | Diff · History | -58 | Undid revision 459930392 by Noformation (talk) Reword made the text unreliable. Manilius did not say it, it's a CP because it implicit in all the major works, his ref offers an example |
| 2011-11-06 10:40 | Diff · History | -184 | Ansering and removing misinformed inline question - Galileo, Kepler and Brahe were all astrologers: their astronomical work did not directly undermine astrological theory neither did theory of heliocentricity. (See recent talk- discussion on Galieo) |
| 2011-11-06 10:36 | Diff · History | 1,043 | Undid revision 459235951 by Yobol (talk) Calling upon named policies to remove well substantiated content like this is distorting their purpose and making a mockery of WP's concern for T & V |
| 2011-10-21 11:55 | Diff · History | 382 | (reverted) →Scientific appraisal: Returning introductory remark which explains why astrology is marked by pseudoscience concerns |
| 2011-10-21 09:02 | Diff · History | 91 | (reverted) Undid revision 456631323 by Dominus Vobisdu (talk)No POV in this remark - see talk |
| 2011-10-20 12:06 | Diff · History | 375 | (reverted) Adding relevant comment from Boll, which cuts to the crux of the definition problem |
| 2011-10-19 07:45 | Diff · History | 6,965 | Undid revision 456315002 by William M. Connolley (talk) Bibliography contains source text details |
| 2011-10-13 19:56 | Diff · History | 1,691 | Reverted to revision 455389174 by Kwamikagami: Reverting collection of edits which together comprise significant changes, breaking the page policy - please propose these suggestions on talk before making unapproved changes. (TW) |
| 2011-10-12 12:41 | Diff · History | -3 | (reverted) →Cultural influence: Ornating is simpler and perfectly fine as the present particle of the *verb* 'to ornate' (if in doubt see http://conjugator.reverso.net/conjugation-english-verb-ornate.html ) |
| 2011-10-12 12:38 | Diff · History | -31 | De-fluffing the pseudoscience reference - see talk page for discussion on this point |
| 2011-10-12 11:12 | Diff · History | 5 | →Cultural influence: Returning image caption to the source description that accompanies it in Wikimedia commons. |
| 2011-10-02 00:23 | Diff · History | 176 | Reverted to revision 453437064 by Dominus Vobisdu: Too many changes that do not work or move the content towards inaccuracies. It should not be done like this: propose edits first. (TW) |
| 2011-10-02 00:18 | Diff · History | 120 | (reverted) It may be a 'pseudoscience' according to what the word means but it is more than just that: it is a search for meaning, and that meaning is aquired by the components mentioned here. Run edits past other editors on talk to keep co-operation |
| 2011-09-30 15:57 | Diff · History | -34 | (reverted) Not necessary now |
| 2011-09-30 05:03 | Diff · History | -8 | →Scientific criticism: Tidying up previous edit. How on EARTH was this necessary act neglected!!!!???? |
| 2011-09-29 13:05 | Diff · History | -1,365 | Factoring in Kwami's non-controversial amendment |
| 2011-09-29 11:31 | Diff · History | -398 | Returning pre-approved text, so suggestions can be properly assessed as part of the ongoing review process - see talk: 'Reminder of policy' |
| 2011-09-27 21:16 | Diff · History | 1,828 | (reverted) Undid revision 452725753 by Itsmejudith (talk) Undoing policy-breaking removal of content. See talk: 'Achieving neutrality' for clarification of policy that applies to this page |
| 2011-09-27 01:02 | Diff · History | 891 | (reverted) Reverted edits by Yobol (talk) to last version by Zachariel |
| 2011-09-27 00:52 | Diff · History | 891 | (reverted) Undid revision 452613184 by Yobol (talk) It clearly states that it underlines the difficulties in terms of "the wider perspective". |
| 2011-09-26 19:08 | Diff · History | 2,279 | Check the policy "represents all significant viewpoints that have been published by reliable sources". Eysenck's review was credible, respected, so *is* the mainstream here. Discuss on talk page before making drastic alterations like this. |
| 2011-09-15 09:47 | Diff · History | 71 | Adding categories |
| 2011-09-08 09:26 | Diff · History | -6,246 | Replacing info-box code with template code |
| 2011-09-08 09:22 | Diff · History | 1 | →Etymology and basic definitions: sp |
| 2011-09-08 09:11 | Diff · History | 430 | →Etymology and basic definitions: Revision to footnote the Pliny comment and demonstrate that planet names were usually made with reference to the divinity whose neame the planet bears. |
| 2011-09-08 08:56 | Diff · History | 198 | →Sources: Adding source text |
| 2011-08-19 12:23 | Diff · History | 1 | →Byzantine and early medieval Islamic astrology: sp |
| 2011-08-19 12:19 | Diff · History | 24 | →Byzantine and early medieval Islamic astrology: wikilink |
| 2011-08-19 12:16 | Diff · History | -14 | →Astrology in the ancient world: declunk |
| 2011-08-19 11:50 | Diff · History | 1 | Adding substantiating comment to the reference |
| 2011-08-19 11:43 | Diff · History | 120 | →Carlson's experiment: Text was correct; unfair design was clearly established by Ertel's independent review (as cited source shows). Have added a comment to the reference to substantiate this point more strongly. |
| 2011-08-15 14:45 | Diff · History | 103 | →Core principles: adding detail to ref |
| 2011-08-15 13:09 | Diff · History | 4 | →Core principles: Italicising book title |
| 2011-08-15 13:05 | Diff · History | 415 | →Core principles: Adding ref from Kepler's work |
| 2011-08-14 11:39 | Diff · History | 6 | →Effects on world culture: copy edit |
| 2011-08-14 11:32 | Diff · History | 87 | →Effects on world culture: Uniting refs and moving to end of sentence for easier reading |
| 2011-08-14 11:28 | Diff · History | 16 | →Effects on world culture: Uniting refs |
| 2011-08-14 11:24 | Diff · History | -21 | →Effects on world culture: Uniting refs |
| 2011-08-14 11:22 | Diff · History | -108 | →Effects on world culture: Simplfying text a little |
| 2011-08-14 11:17 | Diff · History | -4 | →Effects on world culture: Applying consistency in italics and quotes |
| 2011-08-14 11:12 | Diff · History | -19 | →Effects on world culture: reserving double quotes for actual quotes, single quotes for emphasis |
| 2011-08-14 11:07 | Diff · History | 119 | Undid revision 444784508 by Zachariel (talk) 120KB bytes, I guess that's not much |
| 2011-08-14 11:05 | Diff · History | -119 | (reverted) →External links: Just checking how much weight the footer boxes add to the page - will revert myself straight afterwards |
| 2011-08-14 11:03 | Diff · History | -4 | →Effects on world culture: copy edit |
| 2011-08-14 11:00 | Diff · History | 0 | →Core principles: Correcting NASA references |
| 2011-08-11 17:26 | Diff · History | 4 | →Core principles: adding wiki-link |
| 2011-08-11 13:49 | Diff · History | -3 | →Obstacles to research: superflous word |
| 2011-08-11 13:45 | Diff · History | -330 | →Effects on world culture: Removing out of place comment |
| 2011-08-11 13:11 | Diff · History | 4 | →Core principles: completing copy-edit |
| 2011-08-11 12:45 | Diff · History | 1 | →Sources: name fix |
| 2011-08-11 12:42 | Diff · History | -8 | →Core principles: Ref fix |
| 2011-08-11 12:40 | Diff · History | 185 | →Core principles: Adding ref |
| 2011-08-11 12:37 | Diff · History | 154 | →Sources: Adding source text |
| 2011-08-11 12:29 | Diff · History | -74 | →Core principles: Removing full stop |
| 2011-08-11 12:25 | Diff · History | 242 | →Core principles: Retrieving reference |
| 2011-08-11 12:19 | Diff · History | 217 | Notes, ref and wiki-links |
| 2011-08-11 12:06 | Diff · History | 179 | →Sources: Adding new source text |
| 2011-08-11 11:58 | Diff · History | -224 | →Core principles: Removing redundant ref |
| 2011-08-11 11:54 | Diff · History | 2 | →Core principles: Fixing ref |
| 2011-08-11 11:50 | Diff · History | -10 | →Core principles: copy edit - euperflous word |
| 2011-08-11 11:47 | Diff · History | 4 | →Core principles: Copy edit - |
| 2011-08-11 11:44 | Diff · History | -258 | →Core principles: copy-edit |
| 2011-08-11 11:39 | Diff · History | 51 | →Core principles: Copy edit - |
| 2011-08-11 11:22 | Diff · History | 35 | →Core principles: Copy edit based on Ken McRitchie's sandbox suggestions |
| 2011-08-11 11:11 | Diff · History | -742 | →Core principles: Copy edit |
| 2011-08-11 01:40 | Diff · History | 6,761 | Adding design of info box with in-built links to get comment and a feel for the page |
| 2011-08-11 00:39 | Diff · History | 1 | →Research: typo |
| 2011-08-11 00:03 | Diff · History | 0 | →Methods: Date correction |
| 2011-08-11 00:01 | Diff · History | 646 | Adding citation and removing 'citation needed' tag |
| 2011-08-10 23:52 | Diff · History | -93 | →Carlson's experiment: improving reference |
| 2011-08-10 23:39 | Diff · History | 401 | →Sources: Adding sources |
| 2011-08-10 14:34 | Diff · History | -1 | Undid revision 444067657 by Zachariel (talk)My mistake |
| 2011-08-10 14:31 | Diff · History | 1 | (reverted) →Core principles: Correcting refs |
| 2011-08-09 22:53 | Diff · History | -446 | Uncommenting Hindu text |
| 2011-08-09 11:04 | Diff · History | -2 | →Sources: Adding/improving reference(s) |
| 2011-08-08 23:57 | Diff · History | -5 | →Sources: Correcting source text information |
| 2011-08-08 23:53 | Diff · History | 299 | →Obstacles to research: Adding ref |
| 2011-08-08 23:44 | Diff · History | 12 | →Sources: Adding page numbers to source |
| 2011-08-08 23:41 | Diff · History | 243 | →Sources: Adding source |
| 2011-08-08 23:25 | Diff · History | -101 | →Effects on world culture: Adding/improving reference(s) |
| 2011-08-08 23:19 | Diff · History | -71 | →Astology in the modern era: formatting ref |
| 2011-08-08 23:16 | Diff · History | -58 | →Astology in the modern era: Adding/improving reference(s) |
| 2011-08-08 23:12 | Diff · History | 65 | →External links: adding footer links |
| 2011-08-08 21:56 | Diff · History | 38 | →Effects on world culture: A better image for the colour scheme of the page |
| 2011-08-08 21:07 | Diff · History | -1,883 | →Astrological techniques and practices: Clean up |
| 2011-08-08 16:05 | Diff · History | -9 | →Byzantine and early medieval Islamic astrology: Clean up |
| 2011-08-08 15:55 | Diff · History | -2 | →Core principles: Adding/improving reference(s) |
| 2011-08-08 15:49 | Diff · History | -8 | →Core principles: Adding/improving reference(s) |
| 2011-08-08 15:33 | Diff · History | -438 | Fixing citation problem |
| 2011-08-08 13:53 | Diff · History | 2 | →Core principles: Adding emphasis to make clearer that this was Plato's view |
| 2011-08-08 13:51 | Diff · History | 9 | →Core principles: Adding ref to note 125 to qualify comment that these were studies of sensual perception: "the sensibles" |
| 2011-08-08 13:41 | Diff · History | -1 | →Core principles: word correction |
| 2011-08-08 13:33 | Diff · History | 156 | Adding reference to qualify this point |
| 2011-08-08 13:26 | Diff · History | 170 | →Sources: Adding source |
| 2011-08-08 13:02 | Diff · History | 26 | →Core principles: clarifying that sentence |
| 2011-08-08 12:32 | Diff · History | 1 | sp |
| 2011-08-08 12:31 | Diff · History | -129 | Renaming historical subsection - retaining text although it needs reconsideration |
| 2011-08-08 12:18 | Diff · History | 1,871 | Adding section on other cultural systems |
| 2011-08-08 11:28 | Diff · History | 251 | Adding header-link to other culural systems of astrology |
| 2011-08-08 11:08 | Diff · History | 2,669 | Adding info on astrology in the Islamic world |
| 2011-08-08 10:37 | Diff · History | -57 | →Core principles: Shortening image caption |
| 2011-08-08 10:33 | Diff · History | 1 | →Sources: Fixing Marshack ref |
| 2011-08-08 10:31 | Diff · History | 2,500 | Adding info on early origins of astrology (copied form main 'History of astrology' page) |
| 2011-08-08 10:01 | Diff · History | 695 | →Sources: Adding sources |
| 2011-08-08 09:50 | Diff · History | 990 | →History: commenting out content for revision |
| 2011-08-08 09:25 | Diff · History | 303 | Adding Alkindi reference |
| 2011-08-08 09:17 | Diff · History | 185 | →Sources: Adding soruce for reference |
| 2011-08-08 09:13 | Diff · History | 1 | →Core principles: he gave known associations, not his own assumptions |
| 2011-08-08 09:10 | Diff · History | 1 | →Core principles: Past tense - we are talking about a past-view |
| 2011-08-08 07:59 | Diff · History | -8 | →Mechanisms: Avoiding repitition |
| 2011-08-08 07:57 | Diff · History | -102 | →Mechanisms: Fixing Cornelius ref |
| 2011-08-08 07:53 | Diff · History | 213 | →Sources: Adding source |
| 2011-08-08 06:50 | Diff · History | -21 | →Core principles: simplifying text |
| 2011-08-08 06:43 | Diff · History | -38 | →Core principles: simplifying text |
| 2011-08-07 21:14 | Diff · History | -116 | →History: Taking out gawdy image - we can place a suitable image when the content is ready to be illustrated |
| 2011-08-07 21:13 | Diff · History | 207 | →Core principles: Suggesting illustration - does this one work here? |
| 2011-08-07 18:15 | Diff · History | 0 | →Core principles: sp |
| 2011-08-07 18:14 | Diff · History | 8,331 | →Core principles: Adding text developed for this section |
| 2011-08-07 17:39 | Diff · History | -9 | →Etymology and basic definitions: spacing on quote |
| 2011-08-07 17:37 | Diff · History | 289 | Adding sources |
| 2011-08-07 15:34 | Diff · History | 1,130 | Adding sources |
| 2011-08-06 09:32 | Diff · History | -2 | Removing stress from the word 'influence'; not necessary |
| 2011-08-06 09:30 | Diff · History | 5 | wiki-linking 'disposition' |
| 2011-08-05 12:22 | Diff · History | 5 | →Notes: 'See also' |
| 2011-08-05 12:20 | Diff · History | -69 | Formatting Pliny ref |
| 2011-08-05 12:10 | Diff · History | -46 | Formatting Merriam-Webster ref |
| 2011-08-05 11:55 | Diff · History | -123 | Reformatting Partridge ref |
| 2011-08-05 11:34 | Diff · History | 120 | Formatting Gallup ref |
| 2011-08-05 11:28 | Diff · History | -221 | →Sources: Removing unused source |
| 2011-08-05 11:27 | Diff · History | -245 | →Sources: Removing Gallup report - no ISBN |
| 2011-08-05 11:24 | Diff · History | 393 | Formatting refs, adding sources |
| 2011-08-05 09:45 | Diff · History | -1 | →Sources: spacing full stop |
| 2011-08-05 09:37 | Diff · History | -49 | →Etymology and basic definitions: copy-edit |
| 2011-08-05 02:10 | Diff · History | 1 | →Notes: spelling |
| 2011-08-05 01:59 | Diff · History | 33 | Adding back astrology info box and changing quote style |
| 2011-08-05 01:41 | Diff · History | -1,135 | Undid revision 443112592 by Zachariel (talk) my mistake - undoing |
| 2011-08-05 01:40 | Diff · History | 1,135 | (reverted) Changing style of quote |
| 2011-08-05 01:37 | Diff · History | -1,144 | Moved ref to point it illustrates / removed 'failed citation' tag / tied up content now reproduced in criticisms and sharpened text as recommended |
| 2011-08-05 01:03 | Diff · History | -13 | →Criticisms: Removing repeated menu box, brought down by mistake |
| 2011-08-05 01:01 | Diff · History | 914 | →Criticisms: Moving criticisms into relevant - see talk:some general issues |
| 2011-08-04 23:07 | Diff · History | 8 | Undid revision 443094735 by Zachariel (talk) Reverting my own edit |
| 2011-08-04 23:06 | Diff · History | -8 | (reverted) →Etymology and basic definitions: Previously wiki-linked, no need to repeat |
| 2011-08-04 22:19 | Diff · History | 341 | →Effects on world culture: Correcting reference |
| 2011-08-04 22:12 | Diff · History | 45 | Rephrasing to make a little sharper and clarifying fact that it declined after 17th century |
| 2011-08-04 21:49 | Diff · History | -1,307 | Cutting Gallup material, changing 'decline' reference to cited text below, adding statistical attention to reason for renewed interest (fully cited below) |
| 2011-08-04 21:37 | Diff · History | 102 | →Etymology and basic definitions: Adding ref from lede citation (no longer needed there) |
| 2011-08-04 21:31 | Diff · History | 353 | →Effects on world culture: Introducing all Gallup info from the lede (see talk:Some general points) |
| 2011-08-04 19:49 | Diff · History | 157 | →Notes: simplifying note text and clarifying Pltuo positon |
| 2011-08-04 19:36 | Diff · History | -40 | →Notes: adding RC's suggested edit |
| 2011-08-04 19:31 | Diff · History | 2,469 | Adding new 'notes' section and moving 'see also' section down |
| 2011-08-04 19:26 | Diff · History | 2,674 | →Etymology and basic definitions: Adding remaining section text |
| 2011-08-04 18:50 | Diff · History | -189 | →Etymology: Adding first part of Etymology text |
| 2011-08-04 18:47 | Diff · History | -352 | Adding new sources |
| 2011-08-03 09:20 | Diff · History | -41 | Fixing dates in the reference |
| 2011-08-03 09:14 | Diff · History | 184 | →Effects on world culture: Adding Rowling reference |
| 2011-08-03 08:59 | Diff · History | 240 | →Mechanisms: Recovering macrocosm-microcosm reference which is given in the cited source. Have put ref in source - adapt as necessary based on this; I like as is. |
| 2011-08-03 00:10 | Diff · History | -2 | typo |
| 2011-08-02 22:15 | Diff · History | 157 | →Sources: Tidying course texts and adding one ~~~~ |
| 2011-08-01 14:47 | Diff · History | 8 | →Gauquelin's research: Does this work? If not, revert. Should get rid of the word "assault" to ensure an objective tone ~~~~ |
| 2011-08-01 14:33 | Diff · History | -7 | →Methods: simplifying wording ~~~~ |
| 2011-08-01 03:09 | Diff · History | -5 | →Gauquelin's research: small declunk ~~~~ |
| 2011-08-01 02:57 | Diff · History | -1 | →Historical overview: woud be wrong to suggest that astrology was not researched before 20th century - does 'statistical' work here? |
| 2011-07-29 21:14 | Diff · History | 20 | →Criticisms: adding missing words ~~~~ |
| 2011-07-27 08:26 | Diff · History | -5 | Undid revision 441520680 by Petersburg (talk) No need for quote marks, we are reporting and "refuted" is correct - changed 'principles' to 'practices' in line with text meaning ~~~~ |
| 2011-07-27 08:14 | Diff · History | 188 | →Criticisms: Restoring comment that the footnote was qualifying (it does not qualify preceding comment) - please discuss before removing content like this: this puts into proper perspective criticism previously discuss by the same author ~~~~ |
| 2011-07-25 10:33 | Diff · History | -103 | →Research: Removed comment that detracts from objective tone and would be difficult to substantiate ~~~~ |
| 2011-07-22 18:01 | Diff · History | 53 | →Etymology: Replacing inaccesible link, removing poor translation and giving more reliable link to remaining text ~~~~ |
| 2011-07-22 17:16 | Diff · History | -13 | Declunking ~~~~ |
| 2011-07-22 17:13 | Diff · History | -1 | Declunking ~~~~ |
| 2011-07-22 15:22 | Diff · History | -2 | Undid revision 440842206 by Petersburg (talk) Don't agree such a change should be suggested without full discussion ~~~~ |
| 2011-07-22 15:03 | Diff · History | 23 | Same here - the reference given makes no connection to the point made in the article ~~~~ |
| 2011-07-22 15:01 | Diff · History | 22 | This point needs a substantiation by another source or a rewrite to match the definition given in this reference which explains why astrology is a pseudoscience, but doesn't make these points ~~~~ |
| 2011-07-22 14:54 | Diff · History | 0 | Moved two by mistake, moving the other back in place ~~~~ |
| 2011-07-22 14:52 | Diff · History | 0 | In fact, this otherwise irrelevant reference can close this problem. The reference was problematic for not relating to the point it was supposed to be verifying, but will work here as the comment reads now ~~~~ |
| 2011-07-22 14:43 | Diff · History | 18 | Reinserting tag for point under research. Not necessary to 'puff' unless it has been cited as a "classic example" in a reliable source: research so far suggests we just tell it as it is and say "astrology is a pseudoscience". |
| 2011-07-22 10:40 | Diff · History | 19 | Adding agreed edit ~~~~ |
| 2011-07-20 17:12 | Diff · History | 249 | Adding stats to Effects on World Culture ~~~~ |
| 2011-07-20 16:57 | Diff · History | -186 | Spelling mistake and removing redundant source text ~~~~ |
| 2011-07-20 16:53 | Diff · History | 45 | Tidy up the refs ~~~~ |
| 2011-07-20 16:41 | Diff · History | 982 | 2nd paragraph amendment ~~~~ |
| 2011-07-20 14:14 | Diff · History | 23 | Wiki-link to astrological signs ~~~~ |
| 2011-07-20 12:44 | Diff · History | -24 | Change of image ~~~~ |
| 2011-07-20 12:17 | Diff · History | 12 | spacing sown a bit |
| 2011-07-20 12:16 | Diff · History | 1,444 | Adding some pics for aesthetic purposes ~~~~ |
| 2011-07-20 10:51 | Diff · History | -717 | →Astrology and science: Removing point which is now explained more clearly in the new 'criticisms' section ~~~~ |
| 2011-07-20 08:16 | Diff · History | -890 | Decluttering 1st para of lede; moved some content to 'Etymology' - see talk 'Remaining problems with lede' ~~~~ |
| 2011-07-19 21:37 | Diff · History | -93 | →Criticisms: declunk ~~~~ |
| 2011-07-19 21:34 | Diff · History | 393 | →Criticisms: Tidying text ~~~~ |
| 2011-07-19 18:43 | Diff · History | 1 | →Criticisms: Ref ~~~~ |
| 2011-07-19 18:41 | Diff · History | 2,940 | →Criticisms: Creating |
| 2011-07-19 12:18 | Diff · History | -348 | Removing contentious links as per talk page ~~~~ |
| 2011-07-19 10:31 | Diff · History | -176 | →Astrological education: Removing link to astrology school offering diploma following talk page objection. Will discuss there ~~~~ |
| 2011-07-18 14:34 | Diff · History | 2 | If this is going to be moved, it doesn't make sense to not put it where it belongs ~~~~ |
| 2011-07-18 07:47 | Diff · History | 18 | →Astrology and science: added split tag ~~~~ |
| 2011-07-17 16:39 | Diff · History | 177 | Fixing 'asotp' ref ~~~~ |
| 2011-07-17 16:31 | Diff · History | 165 | Redoing Eysenck source information ~~~~ |
| 2011-07-17 16:30 | Diff · History | -740 | Undid revision 439967666 by Zachariel (talk) Revert my own edit- will redo ~~~~ |
| 2011-07-17 16:28 | Diff · History | 740 | (reverted) Adding Eysenck-1982 source details ~~~~ |
| 2011-07-17 16:27 | Diff · History | -31 | →Obstacles to research: Reformating Eysenck refs ~~~~ |
| 2011-07-17 16:24 | Diff · History | -536 | Adding Eysenck ref to 'cognitive bias' criticism ~~~~ |
| 2011-07-17 14:01 | Diff · History | -31 | →Astrology and science: Replacing dead link to Dawkins article to active link ~~~~ |
| 2011-07-17 12:17 | Diff · History | 125 | Formatting Thagard ref ~~~~ |
| 2011-07-17 11:11 | Diff · History | 481 | Adding reference ~~~~ |
| 2011-07-17 04:29 | Diff · History | 0 | Another change of 'the sun' to 'the Sun' ~~~~ |
| 2011-07-17 04:27 | Diff · History | 0 | Capitalising 'Sun' and 'Moon' in line with WP:MOS 3.6 ~~~~ |
| 2011-07-17 04:05 | Diff · History | -38 | →See also: Reducing a little by removing links to 'types of astrology' which are already given in section top link ~~~~ |
| 2011-07-17 04:00 | Diff · History | 38 | →Astrology and science: Two more 'citations needed' for highly questionable remarks, not generally recognised in academia ~~~~ |
| 2011-07-17 03:57 | Diff · History | 38 | citation needed tags ~~~~ |
| 2011-07-17 03:51 | Diff · History | -5 | Uniting mutliple refs in footnote ~~~~ |
| 2011-07-17 03:46 | Diff · History | 428 | Adding ref ~~~~ |
| 2011-07-17 02:34 | Diff · History | 21 | Citation needed ~~~~ |
| 2011-07-17 01:28 | Diff · History | 20 | Inserting citation needed tag ~~~~ |
| 2011-07-16 14:10 | Diff · History | 428 | Adding ref and removing 'by whom?' tag ~~~~ |
| 2011-07-16 13:34 | Diff · History | 394 | Adding reference and removing citation needed tag ~~~~ |
| 2011-07-16 12:12 | Diff · History | 19 | craft=practice / mysticism=divination + psychology (as per talk suggestion) ~~~~ |
| 2011-07-16 11:59 | Diff · History | -19 | Declunking as per talk ~~~ |
| 2011-07-16 11:57 | Diff · History | 17 | Changing 'seven planets' to 'astrological planets' following talk page point that more than 7 planets are used ~~~~ |
| 2011-07-16 11:41 | Diff · History | 453 | Declunking / starting to build refs according to style guide / commencing list of sources ~~~~ |
| 2011-07-15 08:14 | Diff · History | 146 | →Core beliefs and practices: Redirecting dead link ~~~~ |
| 2011-07-14 09:00 | Diff · History | 486 | →Mechanisms: Insering clarification in response to 'clarification needed tag' ~~~~ |
| 2011-07-12 13:09 | Diff · History | 2 | Restoring astrology project box to top of page and replacing the page image that is now used in the box ~~~~ |
| 2011-07-10 15:57 | Diff · History | -113 | Restoring all subheadings as links ~~~~ |
| 2011-07-10 14:25 | Diff · History | -29 | Removing hermeticism and paranormal boxes ~~~~ |
| 2011-07-09 00:14 | Diff · History | 478 | alternative layout suggestion ~~~~ |
All times are in UTC.