Top edits to an page
All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.
| Page | Gliding action (Log · Page History) |
| User | Walabio (Edit Counter· Top Edits) |
| Total edits | 8 |
| Minor edits | 0 (0%) |
| (Semi-)automated edits | 0 (0%) |
| Reverted edits | 4 (50%) |
| atbe1 | 32.9 |
| Added (bytes)2 | 6,693 |
| Deleted (bytes) | -161 |
Minor edits
·
0 (0%)
Major edits
·
8 (100%)
(Semi-)automated edits
·
0 (0%)
Manual edits
·
8 (100%)
Reverted edits
·
4 (50%)
Unreverted edits
·
4 (50%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
| Date | Links | Size | Edit summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2005-10-03 23:30 | Diff · History | -42 | Found a reference to someone unambiguously not liking gliding action. It surprises me that none else found this or similar reference. |
| 2005-10-02 02:50 | Diff · History | 321 | (reverted) Changed pussible which emplies hypothetical to common which in this context has the correct meaning without the wrong connotation and added a note about the context of a quotation. |
| 2005-07-19 23:26 | Diff · History | 6,406 | RV Vandalism |
| 2005-01-26 06:02 | Diff · History | 1,243 | (reverted) On the talkpage, the consensus is that gliding action is not hypothetical -- many references support gliding action including the British Journal of Urology to none stating that gliding action does |
| 2005-01-15 20:33 | Diff · History | 230 | (reverted) Reverting to consensus from talk-page. |
| 2005-01-15 00:43 | Diff · History | -24 | (reverted) As of wednesday, the consensus is not to use the word hypothesized as gliding action is real (see: talk) |
| 2005-01-15 00:16 | Diff · History | 287 | Restoring consensus from talk-page and adding rebuttal to the argument tat one can partially amputate the penis without effecting function in anyway |
| 2005-01-14 01:15 | Diff · History | -119 | Implemented consensus from talk-page. |
All times are in UTC.