Langbahn Team – Weltmeisterschaft

Back VeverveGospel of John • en.wikipedia.org

Top edits to an page All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.

Page Gospel of John (Log · Page History)
User Veverve (Edit Counter· Top Edits)
Total edits 23
Minor edits 5 (21.7%)
(Semi-)automated edits 8 (34.8%)
Reverted edits 1 (4.3%)
atbe1 54.1
Added (bytes)2 443
Deleted (bytes) -756
Minor edits · 5 (21.7%)
Major edits · 18 (78.3%)
(Semi-)automated edits · 8 (34.8%)
Manual edits · 15 (65.2%)
Reverted edits · 1 (4.3%)
Unreverted edits · 22 (95.7%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
Date Links Size Edit summary
Diff · History -19 Undid revision 1199759769 by Ai777 (talk) too long
Diff · History -55 Structure and content: not the page used anymore (again, it is better use the section about terminology where it is explained) + chapter title
Diff · History 34 Structure and content: put the section in which the author detailsthe terminology; the addition of a source had made it so a source previously used was not following what it supported anymore
Diff · History 7 Undid revision 1159917409 by 2600:8800:3136:BD00:8DD3:E1FA:7960:68DA (talk) ???
Diff · History 0 Undid revision 1155092786 by 2806:2F0:90E1:BE04:19E0:491B:D869:E171 (talk) POV
Diff · History 99 Reverted 2 edits by 69.158.150.96 (talk) to last revision by ActivelyDisinterested
Diff · History -4 Undid revision 1152102976 by Carlos Eduardo Aramayo B. (talk) unsourced
Diff · History 0 Reverted 3 edits by 66.76.191.23 (talk) to last revision by ClueBot NG
Diff · History -209 Restored revision 1108999201 by 112.215.170.224 (talk): Not improvements, and the Bible is not a source
Diff · History 0 lede's formatting harmonised with that of Gospel of Luke, Gospel of Mark, Gospel of Matthew
Diff · History -130 Undid revision 1070213687 by Royalistandlegitimist (talk) I disagree with those additions; those languages have no palce in a lede for those topic; please take it to the talk page
Diff · History -61 Reverted good faith edits by Royalistandlegitimist (talk): Latin name is useless and is not present at the oter gospels' pages
Diff · History 0 Reverted 2 edits by 2A00:23C7:F500:FD01:8124:BF79:C4B4:B3C8 (talk)
Diff · History 172 Undid revision 1046166543 by 49.195.12.0 (talk)
Diff · History 62 Structure and content: more nuance
Diff · History -136 Restored revision 1011468555 by Veverve (talk): Those information need to b source, please go to the talk page
Diff · History -12 Undid revision 1011468341 by Jcvamp (talk) check the source
Diff · History -38 Reverted 1 edit by 174.78.1.209 (talk) to last revision by 173.212.116.84
Diff · History -43 Individualism:
Diff · History 1 (reverted)  Undid revision 979282804 by Achar Sva (talk) it is this way on the four gospels, and common names should as much as possible not be between brackets
Diff · History 15 wording
Diff · History -49 moved the note to the summary to harmonize with the article about the four canonical gospels + also called the Gospel of John, or simply John (taken and adapted from Gospel of Luke)
Diff · History 54 harmonisation of the first name given with Gospel of Matthew, Gospel of Luke, Gospel of Mark
All times are in UTC.