Top edits to an page
All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.
Page | Tata Nano (Log · Page History) |
User | Trakesht (Edit Counter· Top Edits) |
Total edits | 27 |
Minor edits | 0 (0%) |
(Semi-)automated edits | 6 (22.2%) |
Reverted edits | 2 (7.4%) |
atbe1 | 13.5 |
Added (bytes)2 | 1,734 |
Deleted (bytes) | -8,745 |
Minor edits
·
0 (0%)
Major edits
·
27 (100%)
(Semi-)automated edits
·
6 (22.2%)
Manual edits
·
21 (77.8%)
Reverted edits
·
2 (7.4%)
Unreverted edits
·
25 (92.6%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
Date | Links | Size | Edit summary |
---|---|---|---|
2009-10-26 12:34 | Diff · History | -6 | →Spontaneous explosions: it is fire..not explosion |
2009-08-04 08:33 | Diff · History | 97 | →Cost cutting features: added references |
2009-08-04 08:32 | Diff · History | 256 | →Cost cutting features: added references |
2009-08-04 08:28 | Diff · History | -146 | Reverted good faith edits by AmardeepBoparai; Please do not add original research/ opinion. (TW) |
2009-06-26 05:35 | Diff · History | -3,336 | Reverted 1 edit by Khurp; Copyrighted content . (TW) |
2009-05-05 11:49 | Diff · History | -36 | Undid revision 288027315 by Vipulkg (talk) uncited claim |
2009-05-05 06:23 | Diff · History | 240 | added number of bookings news- anyone know what happened to first reference |
2009-04-25 04:46 | Diff · History | -209 | the korean steel part is repeated in the safety section, it is not a quality feature per se, and does that single line deserve a separate category? |
2009-04-24 11:33 | Diff · History | -59 | (reverted) using korean steel is not exactly a quality feature- put the statement and reference to safety and removed the section |
2009-04-22 09:51 | Diff · History | -110 | |
2009-04-22 09:48 | Diff · History | -1,644 | →Others: removed references to "current" singur crisis and speculations about 2008 |
2009-04-22 09:45 | Diff · History | -218 | →Singur factory pullout: section seems to be now largely devoid of the issues mentioned |
2009-03-29 14:46 | Diff · History | -7,281 | (reverted) since this is no longer current , the entire singur incident has been condensed into a timeline format. Perhaps a separate detailed article can be made about the singur pullout.discussions are welcome |
2009-03-24 20:23 | Diff · History | -85 | consolidated the info of launch date, sale date and prices |
2009-03-23 17:16 | Diff · History | -53 | updated launch |
2009-03-18 19:52 | Diff · History | -32 | Undid revision 278153715 by 72.37.171.52 (talk) |
2009-03-06 10:04 | Diff · History | 369 | →Competitors: maruti alto lower priced |
2009-02-26 08:34 | Diff · History | -73 | →Variants: expected launch removed |
2009-02-26 08:29 | Diff · History | -967 | →Plant(s) and proposed manufacturing facilities: the withdrawal from singur has already been covered in sufficient detail. |
2009-02-26 08:26 | Diff · History | -1,158 | removed now-redundant speculation on launch date |
2009-02-26 08:21 | Diff · History | 343 | added official launch date |
2009-02-02 10:02 | Diff · History | -550 | →Singur factory pullout: removed info which is now redundant |
2008-12-03 17:33 | Diff · History | -35 | Undid revision 255653749 by 145.53.10.124 (talk) correction- automobile conventions use mm for measuring dimensions! |
2008-11-30 07:52 | Diff · History | -51 | Undid revision 254954864 by Reliancepowercoin (talk) |
2008-10-27 14:58 | Diff · History | -36 | →Technical specifications: - girish wagh is NOT the head of engineering research center in tata motors pune |
2008-10-26 16:59 | Diff · History | 157 | →Corporate Rivalry: gave citations |
2008-10-26 16:50 | Diff · History | 272 | →Relocation and pullout: -added a quote by manmohan singh |
All times are in UTC.