Top edits to an page
All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.
| Page | Basques (Log · Page History) |
| User | Touriste (Edit Counter· Top Edits) |
| Total edits | 8 |
| Minor edits | 3 (37.5%) |
| (Semi-)automated edits | 3 (37.5%) |
| Reverted edits | 0 (0%) |
| atbe1 | 244.5 |
| Added (bytes)2 | 364 |
| Deleted (bytes) | -183 |
Minor edits
·
3 (37.5%)
Major edits
·
5 (62.5%)
(Semi-)automated edits
·
3 (37.5%)
Manual edits
·
5 (62.5%)
Reverted edits
·
0 (0%)
Unreverted edits
·
8 (100%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
| Date | Links | Size | Edit summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013-01-24 14:51 | Diff · History | -81 | removed the "pop" field in the infobox - see Talk Page |
| 2013-01-24 09:33 | Diff · History | 35 | Undid revision 534555217 by Akerbeltz I don't understand the "below" in your edit summary. Please explain in Talk Page |
| 2012-03-01 20:03 | Diff · History | 35 | No need to edit war on a non sourced data : adding a "citation needed" template on the given as "Total population" (odd formulation, but it is inside the infobox template, we cannot change it I suppose) |
| 2008-05-30 12:00 | Diff · History | -51 | Rv - "this is a fact" is not a sufficient reason to include an information |
| 2008-02-20 18:40 | Diff · History | 4 | Undid revision 192761505 by 67.174.107.244 (talk) |
| 2007-11-26 19:26 | Diff · History | 290 | Reinstated Escorial82 footnotes. Though probably perfectible, they bring a fine solution to a real problem : there's no obvious relation between total population of Navarra and the article's title |
| 2007-09-19 13:22 | Diff · History | 0 | "Basse-Navarre" was a redirect. Article title is "Lower Navarre" in English |
| 2007-09-17 06:48 | Diff · History | -51 | Undid revision 158439627 by Dinosaur puppy (talk) Why Basque rather than French or Spanish ? This is ENGLISH Wikipedia |
All times are in UTC.