Langbahn Team – Weltmeisterschaft

Back Thinker78Talk:Tudor Dixon • en.wikipedia.org

Top edits to an page All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.

Page Talk:Tudor Dixon (Log · Page History)
User Thinker78 (Edit Counter· Top Edits)
Total edits 28
Minor edits 0 (0%)
(Semi-)automated edits 1 (3.6%)
Reverted edits 2 (7.1%)
atbe1 1.3
Added (bytes)2 19,725
Deleted (bytes) 0
Minor edits · 0 (0%)
Major edits · 28 (100%)
(Semi-)automated edits · 1 (3.6%)
Manual edits · 27 (96.4%)
Reverted edits · 2 (7.1%)
Unreverted edits · 26 (92.9%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
Date Links Size Edit summary
Diff · History 321 Other proposed language?: implemented proposal 3
Diff · History 569 Other proposed language?: consensus for proposal 3?
Diff · History 370 Reverted edit is more neutral and accurate: Reply to zaathras about the quoted ruling
Diff · History 621 Reverted edit is more neutral and accurate: Reply to zaathras about Dixon's statement
Diff · History 576 Other proposed language?: Reply to nemov
Diff · History 363 Other proposed language?: Reply to ip
Diff · History 19 Other proposed language?: added references template
Diff · History 865 Other proposed language?: Reply to proposal 3
Diff · History 415 Other proposed language?: Reply to formaldude
Diff · History 638 Other proposed language?: Reply to proposal 1
Diff · History 606 Other proposed language?: Reply to proposal 2
Diff · History 1,843 Other proposed language?: Reply to proposal 1
Diff · History 423 Other proposed language?: Reply to formaldude
Diff · History 342 Reverted edit is more neutral and accurate: Reply to ip
Diff · History 832 Reverted edit is more neutral and accurate: Reply to ip
Diff · History 885 Reverted edit is more neutral and accurate: Reply to formaldude
Diff · History 916 Reverted edit is more neutral and accurate: why is an arbitration ruling being ignored?
Diff · History 596 Reverted edit is more neutral and accurate: Reply to formaldude
Diff · History 18 Reverted edit is more neutral and accurate: added reflist template
Diff · History 4,267 appeal of revert
Diff · History 1,052 Tudor Dixon Did Not Assert that the "COVID-19 Pandemic" Was Created By Democrats: Reply to Andre
Diff · History 1,265 Discussion: Reply to ip
Diff · History 625 Discussion: Reply to ip 98
Diff · History 19 Request for comment: sentence in lede: added reftalk template
Diff · History 795 Request for comment: sentence in lede: Reply to ser
Diff · History 484 Request for comment: sentence in lede: added my question per Formal Dude comment in revert. I previously simply clicked on the reply button, I wasn't trying to give any improper notoriety to my question.
Diff · History 485 (reverted)  Undid revision 1119313684 by FormalDude (talk). My question to try to determine neutrality of addition of content to lede was removed without even an explanation. There is a major election in the US this coming 8 November and this rfc pertains to adding criticism to the lead of the subject, who is one of the candidates in said election.
Diff · History 485 (reverted)  Request for comment: sentence in lede: question about neutrality
All times are in UTC.